diff options
author | zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> | 2024-01-05 18:11:43 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> | 2024-01-05 18:11:43 +0100 |
commit | b1ed7ec9f7d1a0142d4f1c8c83bab9172bc92c7c (patch) | |
tree | 07503e493afa381d37d2c744a3dc0e56cd93b080 /src/testdir/test_comparators.vim | |
parent | 68a89470693c7687d4e736ca056c05de632e3ac7 (diff) |
patch 9.1.0014: incorrect use of W_WINROW in edit.cv9.1.0014
Problem: incorrect use of W_WINROW in edit.c
Solution: compare against curwin->w_height instead
Remove incorrect use of W_WINROW
In structs.h it is mentioned that w_wrow is relative to w_winrow, so
using W_WINROW doesn't make sense when comparing with window height.
This change won't lead to any observable behavior change:
The condition intends to check if there are 'scrolloff' lines between
the current cursor when the bottom of the window. When W_WINROW(curwin)
is added to curwin->w_height - 1 - get_scrolloff_value(), the condition
is instead satisfied when the cursor is on some screen line below that
position. However,
- If 'scrolloff' is smaller than half the window height, this condition
can only be satisfied when W_WINROW(curwin) == 0. And if it is not
satisfied, update_topline() does the actual scrolling.
- If 'scrolloff' is larger than half the window height, update_topline()
will put the cursor at the center of the window soon afterwards
anyway, because set_topline() now unsets VALID_TOPLINE flag starting
from https://github.com/vim/vim-history/commit/7db7bb45b0f919ff0615d463ebd4fde881c69d1f.
To put it in another way, https://github.com/vim/vim-history/commit/7db7bb45b0f919ff0615d463ebd4fde881c69d1f
makes the update_topline() just below correct the mistakes made in this
block, so this incorrect use of W_WINROW() no longer affects observable
behavior.
closes: #12331
Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/testdir/test_comparators.vim')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions