updated for version 7.4.609v7.4.609

Problem:    For complicated list and dict use the garbage collector can run
            out of stack space.
Solution:   Use a stack of dicts and lists to be marked, thus making it
            iterative instead of recursive. (Ben Fritz)

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/proto/eval.pro b/src/proto/eval.pro
index b264365fe1..30416fb878 100644
--- a/src/proto/eval.pro
+++ b/src/proto/eval.pro
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ int list_insert_tv __ARGS((list_T *l, typval_T *tv, listitem_T *item));
 void list_insert __ARGS((list_T *l, listitem_T *ni, listitem_T *item));
 void vimlist_remove __ARGS((list_T *l, listitem_T *item, listitem_T *item2));
 int garbage_collect __ARGS((void));
-void set_ref_in_ht __ARGS((hashtab_T *ht, int copyID));
-void set_ref_in_list __ARGS((list_T *l, int copyID));
-void set_ref_in_item __ARGS((typval_T *tv, int copyID));
+int set_ref_in_ht __ARGS((hashtab_T *ht, int copyID, list_stack_T **list_stack));
+int set_ref_in_list __ARGS((list_T *l, int copyID, ht_stack_T **ht_stack));
+int set_ref_in_item __ARGS((typval_T *tv, int copyID, ht_stack_T **ht_stack, list_stack_T **list_stack));
 dict_T *dict_alloc __ARGS((void));
 void dict_unref __ARGS((dict_T *d));
 void dict_free __ARGS((dict_T *d, int recurse));