Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This adds a FIPS indicator for KMAC key size.
Note that 112 bits keys are still smaller than the
sizes required to reach 128 bits for KMAC128 and
256 bits for KMAC256
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25049)
|
|
HMAC has been changed to use a FIPS indicator for its key check.
HKDF and Single Step use a salt rather than a key when using HMAC,
so we need a mechanism to bypass this check in HMAC.
A seperate 'internal' query table has been added to the FIPS provider
for MACS. Giving HMAC a seprate dispatch table allows KDF's to ignore
the key check. If a KDF requires the key check then it must do the
check itself. The normal MAC dipatch table is used if the user fetches
HMAC directly.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25049)
|
|
(in the code, "sigalg" is used to refer to these composite algorithms,
which is a nod to libcrypto and libssl, where that term is commonly used
for composite algorithms)
To make this implementation possible, wrappers were added around the hash
function itself, allowing the use of existing hash implementations through
their respective OSSL_DISPATCH tables, but also retaining the dynamic fetch
of hash implementations when the digest_sign / digest_verify functionality
is used. This wrapper allows implementing the RSA+hash composites through
simple initializer function and a custom OSSL_DISPATCH table for each.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23416)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24844)
|
|
This entropy source can be used instead of SEED-SRC. Sample
openssl.cnf configuration is provided. It is built as a separate
provider, because it is likely to require less frequent updates than
fips provider. The same build likely can span multiple generations of
FIPS 140 standard revisions.
Note that rand-instances currently chain from public/private instances
to primary, prior to consuming the seed. Thus currently a unique ESV
needs to be obtained, and resue of jitterentropy.a certificate is not
possible as is. Separately a patch will be sent to allow for
unchaining public/private RAND instances for the purpose of reusing
ESV.
Also I do wonder if it makes sense to create a fips variant of stock
SEED-SRC entropy source, which in addition to using getrandom() also
verifies that the kernel is operating in FIPS mode and thus is likely
a validated entropy source. As in on Linux, check that
/proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled is set to 1, and similar checks on
Windows / MacOS and so on.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24844)
|
|
Found by running the checkpatch.pl Linux script to enforce coding style.
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22097)
|
|
This avoids code duplication and provides variable-size support
for BLAKE2s like 786b9a8
Test data obtained with libb2 with the following programs:
==> b2.c <==
#include <blake2.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main() {
char buf[16] = {};
blake2s(buf, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0);
write(1, buf, 16);
}
==> b3.c <==
#include <blake2.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main() {
char buf[10] = {};
blake2s(buf, "\x61", 0, 10, 1, 0);
write(1, buf, 10);
}
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22444)
|
|
Also make sure the key is not set if the key
length is changed on the context after the key was
set previously.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22590)
|
|
BLAKE2 is not really an extensible output function unlike SHAKE
as the digest size must be set during the context initialization.
Thus it makes no sense to use OSSL_DIGEST_PARAM_XOFLEN.
We also need to adjust EVP_DigestFinal_ex() to query the
OSSL_DIGEST_PARAM_SIZE as gettable ctx param for the size.
Fixes #22488
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22491)
|
|
This copy would need an update on dupctx but
rather than doing it just remove the copy.
This fixes failures of evp_test on Windows with
new CPUs.
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22384)
|
|
For some reason, the code here was made to got through the provider
specific init functions. This is very very dangerous if the provider
specific functions were to change in any way (such as changes to the
implementation context structure).
Instead, use the init functions from the base blake2 implementations
directly.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22079)
|
|
Add dupctx method support to to ciphers implemented with IMPLEMENT_aead_cipher
This includes:
aes-<kbits>-gcm
aria-<kbits>-ccm
aria-<kbits>-gcm
sm4-<kibs>-gcm
Fixes #21887
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21933)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21260)
|
|
This is defined in NIST SP 800-208 as the truncation to 192 bits of
SHA256. Unlike other truncated hashes in the SHA2 suite, this variant
doesn't have a different initial state, it is just a pure truncation
of the output.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21180)
|
|
This can effectively reduce the binary size for platforms
that don't need ECX feature(~100KB).
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yi1.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20781)
|
|
Fixes #20710
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20745)
|
|
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9106/
Signed-off-by: Čestmír Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12256)
|
|
Signed-off-by: Čestmír Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12256)
|
|
This PR is based off the contributions in PR #9223 by Jemmy1228.
It has been modified and reworked to:
(1) Work with providers
(2) Support ECDSA and DSA
(3) Add a KDF HMAC_DRBG implementation that shares code with the RAND HMAC_DRBG.
A nonce_type is passed around inside the Signing API's, in order to support any
future deterministic algorithms.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18809)
|
|
Signed-off-by: Xu Yizhou <xuyizhou1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19619)
|
|
This function isn't called from anywhere and cannot easily be used
by the current RNG infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19493)
|
|
The code is derived from @sftcd's work in PR #17172.
This PR puts the DHKEM algorithms into the provider layer as
KEM algorithms for EC and ECX.
This PR only implements the DHKEM component of HPKE as specified in
RFC 9180.
crypto/hpke/hpke_util.c has been added for fuctions that will
be shared between DHKEM and HPKE.
API's for EVP_PKEY_auth_encapsulate_init() and EVP_PKEY_auth_decapsulate_init()
have been added to support authenticated encapsulation. auth_init() functions
were chosen rather that a EVP_PKEY_KEM_set_auth() interface to support
future algorithms that could possibly need different init functions.
Internal code has been refactored, so that it can be shared between the DHKEM
and other systems. Since DHKEM operates on low level keys it needs to be
able to do low level ECDH and ECXDH calls without converting the keys
back into EVP_PKEY/EVP_PKEY_CTX form. See ossl_ecx_compute_key(),
ossl_ec_public_from_private()
DHKEM requires API's to derive a key using a seed (IKM). This did not sit
well inside the DHKEM itself as dispatch functions. This functionality
fits better inside the EC and ECX keymanagers keygen, since
they are just variations of keygen where the private key is generated
in a different manner. This should mainly be used for testing purposes.
See ossl_ec_generate_key_dhkem().
It supports this by allowing a settable param to be passed to keygen
(See OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_DHKEM_IKM).
The keygen calls code within ec and ecx dhkem implementation to handle this.
See ossl_ecx_dhkem_derive_private() and ossl_ec_dhkem_derive_private().
These 2 functions are also used by the EC/ECX DHKEM implementations to generate
the sender ephemeral keys.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19068)
|
|
Fixes #18020.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18070)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18819)
|
|
The current code has issues when sizeof(long) <> sizeof(size_t). The two
types are assumed to be interchangeable and them being different will
cause crashes and endless loops.
This fix limits the maximum chunk size for many of the symmetric ciphers
to 2^30 bytes. This chunk size limits the amount of data that will
be encrypted/decrypted in one lump. The code internally handles block
of data later than the chunk limit, so this will present no difference
to the caller. Any loss of efficiency due to limiting the chunking to
1Gbyte rather than more should be insignificant.
Fixes Coverity issues:
1508498, 1508500 - 1508505, 1508507 - 1508527, 1508529 - 1508533,
1508535 - 1508537, 1508539, 1508541 - 1508549, 1508551 - 1508569 &
1508571 - 1508582.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18997)
|
|
Fixes #16721
This uses AES-ECB to create a counter mode AES-CTR32 (32bit counter, I could
not get AES-CTR to work as-is), and GHASH to implement POLYVAL. Optimally,
there would be separate polyval assembly implementation(s), but the only one
I could find (and it was SSE2 x86_64 code) was not Apache 2.0 licensed.
This implementation lives only in the default provider; there is no legacy
implementation.
The code offered in #16721 is not used; that implementation sits on top of
OpenSSL, this one is embedded inside OpenSSL.
Full test vectors from RFC8452 are included, except the 0 length plaintext;
that is not supported; and I'm not sure it's worthwhile to do so.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18693)
|
|
Fixes #18359
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18362)
|
|
Make IV/buf aligned will drastically improve performance
as some architecture performs badly on misaligned memory
access.
Ref to
https://gist.github.com/ZenithalHourlyRate/7b5175734f87acb73d0bbc53391d7140#file-2-openssl-long-md
Ref to
openssl#18197
Signed-off-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i@zenithal.me>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18267)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
This header files are included by multiple other headers.
It's better to add define guards to prevent multi-inclusion.
Adhere to the coding style, all preprocessor directives inside
the guards gain a space.
Signed-off-by: Weiguo Li <liwg06@foxmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17666)
|
|
This is necessary to keep compatibility with 1.1.1.
Fixes #16660
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17016)
|
|
The GCM mode of the SM4 algorithm is specifieded by RFC8998.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16491)
|
|
Add PIN Verification Key key derevation function to providers.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15968)
|
|
Fixes issue openssl#13033
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16594)
|
|
Since EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo is a recognised structure, it's
reasonable to think that someone might want to specify it.
To be noted is that if someone specifies the structure PrivateKeyInfo
but has also passed a passphrase callback, the result will still
become a EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo structure.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
|
|
Fixes #16276
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16286)
|
|
This function needs to be power up tested as part of the FIPS validation and
thus it needs to be inside the provider boundary. This is realised by
introducing a new KDF "TLS13-KDF" which does the required massaging of
parameters but is otherwise functionally equivalent to HKDF.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16203)
|
|
Fixes #16057
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16064)
|
|
This seems to be standard practice so bringing PBKDF1 into line.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15967)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15801)
|
|
Previously all the SubjectPublicKeyInfo decoders were specific to a key
type. We would iterate over all them until a match was found for the correct
key type. Each one would fully decode the key before then testing whether
it was a match or not - throwing it away if not. This was very inefficient.
Instead we introduce a generic SubjectPublicKeyInfo decoder which figures
out what type of key is contained within it, before subsequently passing on
the data to a key type specific SubjectPublicKeyInfo decoder.
Fixes #15646
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15662)
|
|
This has us switch from the 'structure' "pkcs8" to "PrivateKeyInfo",
which is sensible considering we already have "SubjectPublicKeyInfo".
We also add "EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo", and use it for a special decoder
that detects and decrypts an EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo structured DER
blob into a PrivateKeyInfo structured DER blob and passes that on to
the next decoder implementation.
The result of this change is that PKCS#8 decryption should only happen
once per decoding instead of once for every expected key type.
Furthermore, this new decoder implementation sets the data type to the
OID of the algorithmIdentifier field, thus reducing how many decoder
implementations are tentativaly run further down the call chain.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15498)
|
|
Fixes #15531
DES and TDES set this flag which could possibly be used by applications.
The gettable cipher param OSSL_CIPHER_PARAM_HAS_RAND_KEY has been added.
Note that EVP_CIPHER_CTX_rand_key() uses this flag.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15606)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14326)
|
|
Every inclusion directory related to a library we build need these two
files. That signals to any other module using anything from these
libraries what to expect in terms of case sensitivity as well as how
long symbol names are dealt with.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15341)
|
|
The OIDs were extracted with the help of libcrypto's ASN1 OID database.
While doing this, we move all the names strings to macro definitions,
to avoid duplication and conflicting names declarations. Those macros
are all in providers/implementations/include/prov/names.h
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14498)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14801)
|
|
Partial fix for #12964
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14473)
|
|
Partial fix for #12964
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14473)
|