| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Declare EC{PK,}PARAMETERS_{new,free} functions in public headers. The
free functions are necessary because EC_GROUP_get_ec{pk,}parameters()
was made public by commit 60b350a3ef96 ("RT3676: Expose ECgroup i2d
functions").
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Originally PKCS#12 subroutines treated password strings as ASCII.
It worked as long as they were pure ASCII, but if there were some
none-ASCII characters result was non-interoperable. But fixing it
poses problem accessing data protected with broken password. In
order to make asscess to old data possible add retry with old-style
password.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Add mutable versions of X509_get0_notBefore and X509_get0_notAfter.
Rename X509_SIG_get0_mutable to X509_SIG_getm.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1475)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Update certificate and CRL time routines to match new standard.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
A function error code needed updating due to merge issues.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
The DTLS implementation provides some protection against replay attacks
in accordance with RFC6347 section 4.1.2.6.
A sliding "window" of valid record sequence numbers is maintained with
the "right" hand edge of the window set to the highest sequence number we
have received so far. Records that arrive that are off the "left" hand
edge of the window are rejected. Records within the window are checked
against a list of records received so far. If we already received it then
we also reject the new record.
If we have not already received the record, or the sequence number is off
the right hand edge of the window then we verify the MAC of the record.
If MAC verification fails then we discard the record. Otherwise we mark
the record as received. If the sequence number was off the right hand edge
of the window, then we slide the window along so that the right hand edge
is in line with the newly received sequence number.
Records may arrive for future epochs, i.e. a record from after a CCS being
sent, can arrive before the CCS does if the packets get re-ordered. As we
have not yet received the CCS we are not yet in a position to decrypt or
validate the MAC of those records. OpenSSL places those records on an
unprocessed records queue. It additionally updates the window immediately,
even though we have not yet verified the MAC. This will only occur if
currently in a handshake/renegotiation.
This could be exploited by an attacker by sending a record for the next
epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very
large sequence number. This means the right hand edge of the window is
moved very far to the right, and all subsequent legitimate packets are
dropped causing a denial of service.
A similar effect can be achieved during the initial handshake. In this
case there is no MAC key negotiated yet. Therefore an attacker can send a
message for the current epoch with a very large sequence number. The code
will process the record as normal. If the hanshake message sequence number
(as opposed to the record sequence number that we have been talking about
so far) is in the future then the injected message is bufferred to be
handled later, but the window is still updated. Therefore all subsequent
legitimate handshake records are dropped. This aspect is not considered a
security issue because there are many ways for an attacker to disrupt the
initial handshake and prevent it from completing successfully (e.g.
injection of a handshake message will cause the Finished MAC to fail and
the handshake to be aborted). This issue comes about as a result of trying
to do replay protection, but having no integrity mechanism in place yet.
Does it even make sense to have replay protection in epoch 0? That
issue isn't addressed here though.
This addressed an OCAP Audit issue.
CVE-2016-2181
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Since dasync isn't installed, and is only ever used as a dynamic
engine, there's no reason to consider it for initialization when
building static engines.
Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
|
|
Constify X509_SIG_get0() and order arguments to mactch new standard.
Add X509_SIG_get0_mutable() to support modification or initialisation
of an X509_SIG structure.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Put the main object first in the params list.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
* SSL_SESSION_set1_id()
* SSL_SESSION_get0_id_context()
* SSL_CTX_get_tlsext_status_cb()
* SSL_CTX_get_tlsext_status_arg()
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
These functions are no longer relevant to 1.1.0 (we always have auto ecdh
on) - but no reason to break old code that tries to call it. The macros will
only return a dummy "success" result if the app was trying to enable ecdh.
Disabling can't be done in quite this way any more.
Fixes Github Issue #1437
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
|
|
Deprecate the function ASN1_STRING_data() and replace with a new function
ASN1_STRING_get0_data() which returns a constant pointer. Update library
to use new function.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
They may fail if they cannot increment the reference count of the
certificate they are storing a pointer for. They should return 0 if this
occurs.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1408)
|
|
Changes them to have clearer ownership semantics, as suggested in
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1372#discussion_r73232196.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1408)
|
|
Add ctrl operations to set or retrieve encoded point in
EVP_PKEY structures containing X25519 keys.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1451)
|
|
Binary- and backward-compatible. Just better.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1429)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1421)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1397)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1385
|
|
In one failure case, it used to return -1. That failure case
(CTLOG_new() returning NULL) was not usefully distinct from all of the
other failure cases.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1407)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1413)
|
|
This is an entirely useless function, given that CTLOG is publicly
immutable.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1406)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
DTLSv1_client_method() is deprecated, but it was the only way to obtain
DTLS1_BAD_VER support. The SSL_OP_CISCO_ANYCONNECT hack doesn't work with
DTLS_client_method(), and it's relatively non-trivial to make it work without
expanding the hack into lots of places.
So deprecate SSL_OP_CISCO_ANYCONNECT with DTLSv1_client_method(), and make
it work with SSL_CTX_set_{min,max}_proto_version(DTLS1_BAD_VER) instead.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1389)
|
