PR: 1835

Submitted by: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
Approved by: steve@openssl.org

Fix various typos.

6 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c b/crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c
index 8d13f9c931..92d630cdba 100644
--- a/crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c
+++ b/crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ASN1_STRING *d2i_ASN1_type_bytes(ASN1_STRING **a, const unsigned char **pp,
 
 	if (tag >= 32)
 		{
-		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;;
+		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;
 		goto err;
 		}
 	if (!(ASN1_tag2bit(tag) & type))
diff --git a/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c b/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c
index 8b09e5890f..8f746f9c05 100644
--- a/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c
+++ b/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int X509_signature_print(BIO *bp, X509_ALGOR *sigalg, ASN1_STRING *sig)
 int ASN1_STRING_print(BIO *bp, ASN1_STRING *v)
 	{
 	int i,n;
-	char buf[80],*p;;
+	char buf[80],*p;
 
 	if (v == NULL) return(0);
 	n=0;
diff --git a/crypto/bn/bntest.c b/crypto/bn/bntest.c
index 310763eca0..cf190380f5 100644
--- a/crypto/bn/bntest.c
+++ b/crypto/bn/bntest.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx)
 		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/
 
 		if (!BN_mod_exp(d,a,b,c,ctx))
-			return(00);
+			return(0);
 
 		if (bp != NULL)
 			{
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int test_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx)
 		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/
 
 		if (!BN_exp(d,a,b,ctx))
-			return(00);
+			return(0);
 
 		if (bp != NULL)
 			{
diff --git a/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc b/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
index f6ec8e8831..0864285ef6 100644
--- a/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
+++ b/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
 
 For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
 gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
-I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
+I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
 is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES
 routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher
 speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
diff --git a/crypto/ripemd/README b/crypto/ripemd/README
index 7097707264..f1ffc8b134 100644
--- a/crypto/ripemd/README
+++ b/crypto/ripemd/README
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
 This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160.  The pentium assember is a little
 off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.
 I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at
-this point I will not bother right now.  I belive the trick will be
+this point I will not bother right now.  I believe the trick will be
 to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the
 first time round.  To do this I need another register and will only have one
 temporary one.  A bit tricky....  I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words
diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/v3_utl.c b/crypto/x509v3/v3_utl.c
index a4236bbb6d..7a45216c00 100644
--- a/crypto/x509v3/v3_utl.c
+++ b/crypto/x509v3/v3_utl.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int X509V3_add_value(const char *name, const char *value,
 	CONF_VALUE *vtmp = NULL;
 	char *tname = NULL, *tvalue = NULL;
 	if(name && !(tname = BUF_strdup(name))) goto err;
-	if(value && !(tvalue = BUF_strdup(value))) goto err;;
+	if(value && !(tvalue = BUF_strdup(value))) goto err;
 	if(!(vtmp = (CONF_VALUE *)OPENSSL_malloc(sizeof(CONF_VALUE)))) goto err;
 	if(!*extlist && !(*extlist = sk_CONF_VALUE_new_null())) goto err;
 	vtmp->section = NULL;