diff options
| author | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2005-05-03 21:16:42 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2005-05-03 21:16:42 +0000 |
| commit | 647907918d7ad6708548af9c0fbcc008ad1acc31 (patch) | |
| tree | ddedb7d9252c9b591c3bfda70e96454a04e5598e /crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl | |
| parent | cee73df3bd6dfad96f686b766cc8900f432d23b4 (diff) | |
Commentary update.
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl')
| -rwxr-xr-x | crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl index 89239400d4..f96df377b5 100755 --- a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl @@ -44,8 +44,10 @@ # improvement [I had to test it], while final Intel P4 performance # achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference. # If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than -# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's is only 25% -# slower than the latter... +# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25% +# slower slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if detecting CPU +# is not desired, then RC4_CHAR code-path should be preferred, as it +# provides better *all-round* performance]. $output=shift; open STDOUT,"| $^X ../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl $output"; |