diff options
author | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2007-11-11 13:34:08 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2007-11-11 13:34:08 +0000 |
commit | 98b09d3949051a0c15e97ad0601c9988f6e718e1 (patch) | |
tree | 16d12684ede6ccdbd9e54befdccff1b3f21dc6f0 /crypto/md4 | |
parent | 231a737a82cecde336ef4eeebdc26469f8c44e98 (diff) |
Synchronize message digests in 098-fips with 098.
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/md4')
-rw-r--r-- | crypto/md4/md4_dgst.c | 89 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | crypto/md4/md4_locl.h | 44 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 133 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/md4/md4_dgst.c b/crypto/md4/md4_dgst.c index 86b79b8e4d..cfef94af39 100644 --- a/crypto/md4/md4_dgst.c +++ b/crypto/md4/md4_dgst.c @@ -82,79 +82,6 @@ int MD4_Init(MD4_CTX *c) return 1; } -#ifndef md4_block_host_order -void md4_block_host_order (MD4_CTX *c, const void *data, size_t num) - { - const MD4_LONG *X=data; - register unsigned MD32_REG_T A,B,C,D; - - A=c->A; - B=c->B; - C=c->C; - D=c->D; - - for (;num--;X+=HASH_LBLOCK) - { - /* Round 0 */ - R0(A,B,C,D,X[ 0], 3,0); - R0(D,A,B,C,X[ 1], 7,0); - R0(C,D,A,B,X[ 2],11,0); - R0(B,C,D,A,X[ 3],19,0); - R0(A,B,C,D,X[ 4], 3,0); - R0(D,A,B,C,X[ 5], 7,0); - R0(C,D,A,B,X[ 6],11,0); - R0(B,C,D,A,X[ 7],19,0); - R0(A,B,C,D,X[ 8], 3,0); - R0(D,A,B,C,X[ 9], 7,0); - R0(C,D,A,B,X[10],11,0); - R0(B,C,D,A,X[11],19,0); - R0(A,B,C,D,X[12], 3,0); - R0(D,A,B,C,X[13], 7,0); - R0(C,D,A,B,X[14],11,0); - R0(B,C,D,A,X[15],19,0); - /* Round 1 */ - R1(A,B,C,D,X[ 0], 3,0x5A827999L); - R1(D,A,B,C,X[ 4], 5,0x5A827999L); - R1(C,D,A,B,X[ 8], 9,0x5A827999L); - R1(B,C,D,A,X[12],13,0x5A827999L); - R1(A,B,C,D,X[ 1], 3,0x5A827999L); - R1(D,A,B,C,X[ 5], 5,0x5A827999L); - R1(C,D,A,B,X[ 9], 9,0x5A827999L); - R1(B,C,D,A,X[13],13,0x5A827999L); - R1(A,B,C,D,X[ 2], 3,0x5A827999L); - R1(D,A,B,C,X[ 6], 5,0x5A827999L); - R1(C,D,A,B,X[10], 9,0x5A827999L); - R1(B,C,D,A,X[14],13,0x5A827999L); - R1(A,B,C,D,X[ 3], 3,0x5A827999L); - R1(D,A,B,C,X[ 7], 5,0x5A827999L); - R1(C,D,A,B,X[11], 9,0x5A827999L); - R1(B,C,D,A,X[15],13,0x5A827999L); - /* Round 2 */ - R2(A,B,C,D,X[ 0], 3,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(D,A,B,C,X[ 8], 9,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(C,D,A,B,X[ 4],11,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(B,C,D,A,X[12],15,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(A,B,C,D,X[ 2], 3,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(D,A,B,C,X[10], 9,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(C,D,A,B,X[ 6],11,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(B,C,D,A,X[14],15,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(A,B,C,D,X[ 1], 3,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(D,A,B,C,X[ 9], 9,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(C,D,A,B,X[ 5],11,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(B,C,D,A,X[13],15,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(A,B,C,D,X[ 3], 3,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(D,A,B,C,X[11], 9,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(C,D,A,B,X[ 7],11,0x6ED9EBA1); - R2(B,C,D,A,X[15],15,0x6ED9EBA1); - - A = c->A += A; - B = c->B += B; - C = c->C += C; - D = c->D += D; - } - } -#endif - #ifndef md4_block_data_order #ifdef X #undef X @@ -240,19 +167,3 @@ void md4_block_data_order (MD4_CTX *c, const void *data_, size_t num) } } #endif - -#ifdef undef -int printit(unsigned long *l) - { - int i,ii; - - for (i=0; i<2; i++) - { - for (ii=0; ii<8; ii++) - { - fprintf(stderr,"%08lx ",l[i*8+ii]); - } - fprintf(stderr,"\n"); - } - } -#endif diff --git a/crypto/md4/md4_locl.h b/crypto/md4/md4_locl.h index abc7b9bb84..c8085b0ead 100644 --- a/crypto/md4/md4_locl.h +++ b/crypto/md4/md4_locl.h @@ -65,43 +65,13 @@ #define MD4_LONG_LOG2 2 /* default to 32 bits */ #endif -void md4_block_host_order (MD4_CTX *c, const void *p,size_t num); void md4_block_data_order (MD4_CTX *c, const void *p,size_t num); -#if defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86) || defined(__INTEL__) -# if !defined(B_ENDIAN) -/* - * *_block_host_order is expected to handle aligned data while - * *_block_data_order - unaligned. As algorithm and host (x86) - * are in this case of the same "endianness" these two are - * otherwise indistinguishable. But normally you don't want to - * call the same function because unaligned access in places - * where alignment is expected is usually a "Bad Thing". Indeed, - * on RISCs you get punished with BUS ERROR signal or *severe* - * performance degradation. Intel CPUs are in turn perfectly - * capable of loading unaligned data without such drastic side - * effect. Yes, they say it's slower than aligned load, but no - * exception is generated and therefore performance degradation - * is *incomparable* with RISCs. What we should weight here is - * costs of unaligned access against costs of aligning data. - * According to my measurements allowing unaligned access results - * in ~9% performance improvement on Pentium II operating at - * 266MHz. I won't be surprised if the difference will be higher - * on faster systems:-) - * - * <appro@fy.chalmers.se> - */ -# define md4_block_data_order md4_block_host_order -# endif -#endif - #define DATA_ORDER_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN #define HASH_LONG MD4_LONG -#define HASH_LONG_LOG2 MD4_LONG_LOG2 #define HASH_CTX MD4_CTX #define HASH_CBLOCK MD4_CBLOCK -#define HASH_LBLOCK MD4_LBLOCK #define HASH_UPDATE MD4_Update #define HASH_TRANSFORM MD4_Transform #define HASH_FINAL MD4_Final @@ -112,21 +82,7 @@ void md4_block_data_order (MD4_CTX *c, const void *p,size_t num); ll=(c)->C; HOST_l2c(ll,(s)); \ ll=(c)->D; HOST_l2c(ll,(s)); \ } while (0) -#define HASH_BLOCK_HOST_ORDER md4_block_host_order -#if !defined(L_ENDIAN) || defined(md4_block_data_order) #define HASH_BLOCK_DATA_ORDER md4_block_data_order -/* - * Little-endians (Intel and Alpha) feel better without this. - * It looks like memcpy does better job than generic - * md4_block_data_order on copying-n-aligning input data. - * But frankly speaking I didn't expect such result on Alpha. - * On the other hand I've got this with egcs-1.0.2 and if - * program is compiled with another (better?) compiler it - * might turn out other way around. - * - * <appro@fy.chalmers.se> - */ -#endif #include "md32_common.h" |