summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto/aes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>2015-07-14 01:15:49 +0200
committerRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>2015-07-14 01:17:45 +0200
commit9f0b86c68bb96d49301bbd6473c8235ca05ca06b (patch)
treeda23b40a7ee3ea6b0f58642e5129f01cc68257a7 /crypto/aes
parent5a3ce86e21715a683ff0d32421ed5c6d5e84234d (diff)
Conversion to UTF-8 where needed
This leaves behind files with names ending with '.iso-8859-1'. These should be safe to remove. If something went wrong when re-encoding, there will be some files with names ending with '.utf8' left behind. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/aes')
-rwxr-xr-xcrypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl
index 451d0e0ed1..60286ecb96 100755
--- a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl
+++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
# the undertaken effort was that it appeared that in tight IA-32
# register window little-endian flavor could achieve slightly higher
# Instruction Level Parallelism, and it indeed resulted in up to 15%
-# better performance on most recent µ-archs...
+# better performance on most recent µ-archs...
#
# Third version adds AES_cbc_encrypt implementation, which resulted in
# up to 40% performance imrovement of CBC benchmark results. 40% was
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ sub _data_word() { my $i; while(defined($i=shift)) { &data_word($i,$i); } }
$speed_limit=512; # chunks smaller than $speed_limit are
# processed with compact routine in CBC mode
$small_footprint=1; # $small_footprint=1 code is ~5% slower [on
- # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller!
+ # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller!
# I favor compact code to minimize cache
# contention and in hope to "collect" 5% back
# in real-life applications...
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ sub enctransform()
# Performance is not actually extraordinary in comparison to pure
# x86 code. In particular encrypt performance is virtually the same.
# Decrypt performance on the other hand is 15-20% better on newer
-# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50%
+# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50%
# better on PIII:-) And additionally on the pros side this code
# eliminates redundant references to stack and thus relieves/
# minimizes the pressure on the memory bus.