diff options
| author | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2015-01-05 23:40:10 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2015-01-13 21:42:13 +0100 |
| commit | 10771e3421ea435623f85304738280415d6b55c7 (patch) | |
| tree | 43e5fa35f8681516e4500ef50fb928b5c2b6f436 | |
| parent | 36f694e09add27e5619abab9de2bbb0b6bf61037 (diff) | |
Add Broadwell performance results.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit b3d7294976c58e0e05d0ee44a0e7c9c3b8515e05)
| -rwxr-xr-x | crypto/bn/asm/rsaz-avx2.pl | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl | 4 |
3 files changed, 11 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/bn/asm/rsaz-avx2.pl b/crypto/bn/asm/rsaz-avx2.pl index e608cb49da..3b6ccf83d1 100755 --- a/crypto/bn/asm/rsaz-avx2.pl +++ b/crypto/bn/asm/rsaz-avx2.pl @@ -61,8 +61,12 @@ # # rsa2048 sign/sec OpenSSL 1.0.1 scalar(*) this # 2.3GHz Haswell 621 765/+23% 1113/+79% +# 2.3GHz Broadwell(**) 688 1200(***)/+74% 1120/+63% # # (*) if system doesn't support AVX2, for reference purposes; +# (**) scaled to 2.3GHz to simplify comparison; +# (***) scalar AD*X code is faster than AVX2 and is preferred code +# path for Broadwell; $flavour = shift; $output = shift; diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl index cfc856cf35..7e4e04ea25 100644 --- a/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ # [1] and [2], with MOVBE twist suggested by Ilya Albrekht and Max # Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. who verified that it reduces shuffles # pressure with notable relative improvement, achieving 1.0 cycle per -# byte processed with 128-bit key on Haswell processor. +# byte processed with 128-bit key on Haswell processor, and 0.74 - +# on Broadwell. [Mentioned results are raw profiled measurements for +# favourable packet size, one divisible by 96. Applications using the +# EVP interface will observe a few percent worse performance.] # # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest # [2] http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/software-support/enabling-high-performance-gcm.pdf diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl index ce7d1cb8ba..6e656ca13b 100644 --- a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ # Sandy Bridge 1.80(+8%) # Ivy Bridge 1.80(+7%) # Haswell 0.55(+93%) (if system doesn't support AVX) +# Broadwell 0.45(+110%)(if system doesn't support AVX) # Bulldozer 1.49(+27%) # Silvermont 2.88(+13%) @@ -73,7 +74,8 @@ # CPUs such as Sandy and Ivy Bridge can execute it, the code performs # sub-optimally in comparison to above mentioned version. But thanks # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we knew that -# it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor. +# it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor, and in +# 0.29 on Broadwell. # # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest |