Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code

This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code.  We do some
basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code
works.  I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to
insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself,
hopefully this will be usefull in the future.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
index 757ef00a75a4..a5dcacb5df9c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
 #include <linux/magic.h>
 #include "btrfs-tests.h"
 #include "../ctree.h"
+#include "../volumes.h"
+#include "../disk-io.h"
+#include "../qgroup.h"
 
 static struct vfsmount *test_mnt = NULL;
 
@@ -72,3 +75,97 @@ void btrfs_destroy_test_fs(void)
 	kern_unmount(test_mnt);
 	unregister_filesystem(&test_type);
 }
+
+struct btrfs_fs_info *btrfs_alloc_dummy_fs_info(void)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct btrfs_fs_info),
+						GFP_NOFS);
+
+	if (!fs_info)
+		return fs_info;
+	fs_info->fs_devices = kzalloc(sizeof(struct btrfs_fs_devices),
+				      GFP_NOFS);
+	if (!fs_info->fs_devices) {
+		kfree(fs_info);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	fs_info->super_copy = kzalloc(sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block),
+				      GFP_NOFS);
+	if (!fs_info->super_copy) {
+		kfree(fs_info->fs_devices);
+		kfree(fs_info);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (init_srcu_struct(&fs_info->subvol_srcu)) {
+		kfree(fs_info->fs_devices);
+		kfree(fs_info->super_copy);
+		kfree(fs_info);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->qgroup_op_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->super_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
+	mutex_init(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
+	mutex_init(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
+	rwlock_init(&fs_info->tree_mod_log_lock);
+	fs_info->running_transaction = NULL;
+	fs_info->qgroup_tree = RB_ROOT;
+	fs_info->qgroup_ulist = NULL;
+	atomic64_set(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq, 0);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->dirty_qgroups);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->dead_roots);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list);
+	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&fs_info->buffer_radix, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	return fs_info;
+}
+
+static void btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+	struct radix_tree_iter iter;
+	void **slot;
+
+	spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
+restart:
+	radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &fs_info->buffer_radix, &iter, 0) {
+		struct extent_buffer *eb;
+
+		eb = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
+		if (!eb)
+			continue;
+		/* Shouldn't happen but that kind of thinking creates CVE's */
+		if (radix_tree_exception(eb)) {
+			if (radix_tree_deref_retry(eb))
+				goto restart;
+			continue;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
+		free_extent_buffer_stale(eb);
+		spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
+
+	btrfs_free_qgroup_config(fs_info);
+	btrfs_free_fs_roots(fs_info);
+	cleanup_srcu_struct(&fs_info->subvol_srcu);
+	kfree(fs_info->super_copy);
+	kfree(fs_info->fs_devices);
+	kfree(fs_info);
+}
+
+void btrfs_free_dummy_root(struct btrfs_root *root)
+{
+	if (!root)
+		return;
+	if (root->node)
+		free_extent_buffer(root->node);
+	if (root->fs_info)
+		btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(root->fs_info);
+	kfree(root);
+}
+