diff options
author | Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> | 2020-02-11 11:35:01 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-02-11 11:15:28 -0800 |
commit | e2525a95cc0887c7dc0549cb5d0ac3e796e1d54c (patch) | |
tree | e4897050c1f569c224dfe4dd51cc9fdabed81daa /drivers/staging | |
parent | 4033714d6cbe04893aa0708d1fcaa45dd8eb3f53 (diff) |
staging: wfx: annotate nested gc_list vs tx queue locking
Lockdep is complaining about recursive locking, because it can't make
a difference between locked skb_queues. Annotate nested locks and avoid
double bh_disable/enable.
[...]
insmod/815 is trying to acquire lock:
cb7d6418 (&(&list->lock)->rlock){+...}, at: wfx_tx_queues_clear+0xfc/0x198 [wfx]
but task is already holding lock:
cb7d61f4 (&(&list->lock)->rlock){+...}, at: wfx_tx_queues_clear+0xa0/0x198 [wfx]
[...]
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock);
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 9bca45f3d692 ("staging: wfx: allow to send 802.11 frames")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e30397af95854b4a7deea073b730c00229f42ba.1581416843.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/staging')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c index c73d158668e3..ed6dc8297738 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c @@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ static void wfx_tx_queue_clear(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, spin_lock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); while ((item = __skb_dequeue(&queue->queue)) != NULL) skb_queue_head(gc_list, item); - spin_lock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_lock_nested(&stats->pending.lock, 1); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats->link_map_cache); ++i) { stats->link_map_cache[i] -= queue->link_map_cache[i]; queue->link_map_cache[i] = 0; } - spin_unlock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_unlock(&stats->pending.lock); spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); } @@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ void wfx_tx_queue_put(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_queue *queue, ++queue->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]; - spin_lock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_lock_nested(&stats->pending.lock, 1); ++stats->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]; - spin_unlock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_unlock(&stats->pending.lock); spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); } @@ -237,11 +237,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queue_get(struct wfx_dev *wdev, __skb_unlink(skb, &queue->queue); --queue->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]; - spin_lock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_lock_nested(&stats->pending.lock, 1); __skb_queue_tail(&stats->pending, skb); if (!--stats->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]) wakeup_stats = true; - spin_unlock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_unlock(&stats->pending.lock); } spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); if (wakeup_stats) @@ -259,10 +259,10 @@ int wfx_pending_requeue(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct sk_buff *skb) spin_lock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); ++queue->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]; - spin_lock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_lock_nested(&stats->pending.lock, 1); ++stats->link_map_cache[tx_priv->link_id]; __skb_unlink(skb, &stats->pending); - spin_unlock_bh(&stats->pending.lock); + spin_unlock(&stats->pending.lock); __skb_queue_tail(&queue->queue, skb); spin_unlock_bh(&queue->queue.lock); return 0; |