diff options
author | Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> | 2018-08-14 21:46:16 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-08-19 10:46:21 -0700 |
commit | 653cd284a8a857ddfcf24f5bc3bd204a229f6c9f (patch) | |
tree | 2ffd3178a3e8277b7b42ade98edcfeb5bed976c7 /drivers/net | |
parent | bb107456ba5a85e50567d56b0c8050c2ad199e9b (diff) |
net: sched: always disable bh when taking tcf_lock
Recently, ops->init() and ops->dump() of all actions were modified to
always obtain tcf_lock when accessing private action state. Actions that
don't depend on tcf_lock for synchronization with their data path use
non-bh locking API. However, tcf_lock is also used to protect rate
estimator stats in softirq context by timer callback.
Change ops->init() and ops->dump() of all actions to disable bh when using
tcf_lock to prevent deadlock reported by following lockdep warning:
[ 105.470398] ================================
[ 105.475014] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 105.479628] 4.18.0-rc8+ #664 Not tainted
[ 105.483897] --------------------------------
[ 105.488511] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[ 105.494871] swapper/16/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[ 105.500449] 00000000f86c012e (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0
[ 105.509696] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[ 105.514925] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[ 105.519022] tcf_bpf_init+0x579/0x820 [act_bpf]
[ 105.523990] tcf_action_init_1+0x4e4/0x660
[ 105.528518] tcf_action_init+0x1ce/0x2d0
[ 105.532880] tcf_exts_validate+0x1d8/0x200
[ 105.537416] fl_change+0x55a/0x268b [cls_flower]
[ 105.542469] tc_new_tfilter+0x748/0xa20
[ 105.546738] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x56a/0x6d0
[ 105.551268] netlink_rcv_skb+0x18d/0x200
[ 105.555628] netlink_unicast+0x2d0/0x370
[ 105.559990] netlink_sendmsg+0x3b9/0x6a0
[ 105.564349] sock_sendmsg+0x6b/0x80
[ 105.568271] ___sys_sendmsg+0x4a1/0x520
[ 105.572547] __sys_sendmsg+0xd7/0x150
[ 105.576655] do_syscall_64+0x72/0x2c0
[ 105.580757] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 105.586243] irq event stamp: 489296
[ 105.590084] hardirqs last enabled at (489296): [<ffffffffb507e639>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
[ 105.599765] hardirqs last disabled at (489295): [<ffffffffb507e745>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x15/0x50
[ 105.609277] softirqs last enabled at (489292): [<ffffffffb413a6a3>] irq_enter+0x83/0xa0
[ 105.618001] softirqs last disabled at (489293): [<ffffffffb413a800>] irq_exit+0x140/0x190
[ 105.626813]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 105.633976] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 105.640526] CPU0
[ 105.643325] ----
[ 105.646125] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock);
[ 105.650747] <Interrupt>
[ 105.653717] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock);
[ 105.658514]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 105.665349] 1 lock held by swapper/16/0:
[ 105.669629] #0: 00000000a640ad99 ((&est->timer)){+.-.}, at: call_timer_fn+0x10b/0x550
[ 105.678200]
stack backtrace:
[ 105.683194] CPU: 16 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/16 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc8+ #664
[ 105.690249] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-2028TP-DECR/X10DRT-P, BIOS 2.0b 03/30/2017
[ 105.698626] Call Trace:
[ 105.701421] <IRQ>
[ 105.703791] dump_stack+0x92/0xeb
[ 105.707461] print_usage_bug+0x336/0x34c
[ 105.711744] mark_lock+0x7c9/0x980
[ 105.715500] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x2e0/0x2e0
[ 105.721424] ? check_usage_forwards+0x230/0x230
[ 105.726315] __lock_acquire+0x923/0x26f0
[ 105.730597] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x240/0x240
[ 105.735478] ? mark_lock+0x493/0x980
[ 105.739412] ? check_chain_key+0x140/0x1f0
[ 105.743861] ? __lock_acquire+0x836/0x26f0
[ 105.748323] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290
[ 105.752516] lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290
[ 105.756539] ? est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0
[ 105.761084] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[ 105.765099] ? est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0
[ 105.769633] est_fetch_counters+0x3c/0xa0
[ 105.773995] est_timer+0x87/0x390
[ 105.777670] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0
[ 105.782210] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290
[ 105.786410] call_timer_fn+0x161/0x550
[ 105.790512] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0
[ 105.795055] ? del_timer_sync+0xd0/0xd0
[ 105.799249] ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x110
[ 105.803531] ? mark_held_locks+0x20/0xe0
[ 105.807813] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40
[ 105.812525] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0
[ 105.817069] ? est_fetch_counters+0xa0/0xa0
[ 105.821610] run_timer_softirq+0x3c4/0x9f0
[ 105.826064] ? lock_acquire+0x12e/0x290
[ 105.830257] ? __bpf_trace_timer_class+0x10/0x10
[ 105.835237] ? __lock_is_held+0x25/0x110
[ 105.839517] __do_softirq+0x11d/0x7bf
[ 105.843542] irq_exit+0x140/0x190
[ 105.847208] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xac/0x3b0
[ 105.852182] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
[ 105.856628] </IRQ>
[ 105.859081] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd8/0x4d0
[ 105.864395] Code: 46 ff 48 89 44 24 08 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 ff e8 cf ec 46 ff 80 7c 24 07 00 0f 85 1d 02 00 00 e8 9f 90 4b ff fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <4c> 8b 6c 24 08 4d 29 fd 0f 80 36 03 00 00 4c 89 e8 48 ba cf f7 53
[ 105.884288] RSP: 0018:ffff8803ad94fd20 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
[ 105.892494] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffe8fb300829c0 RCX: ffffffffb41e19e1
[ 105.899988] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff8803ad9358ac
[ 105.907503] RBP: ffffffffb6636300 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 105.914997] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000004
[ 105.922487] R13: ffffffffb6636140 R14: ffffffffb66362d8 R15: 000000188d36091b
[ 105.929988] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x141/0x2d0
[ 105.935232] do_idle+0x28e/0x320
[ 105.938817] ? arch_cpu_idle_exit+0x40/0x40
[ 105.943361] ? mark_lock+0x8c1/0x980
[ 105.947295] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60
[ 105.952619] cpu_startup_entry+0xc2/0xd0
[ 105.956900] ? cpu_in_idle+0x20/0x20
[ 105.960830] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60
[ 105.966146] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x141/0x2d0
[ 105.971391] start_secondary+0x2b5/0x360
[ 105.975669] ? set_cpu_sibling_map+0x1330/0x1330
[ 105.980654] secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
Taking tcf_lock in sample action with bh disabled causes lockdep to issue a
warning regarding possible irq lock inversion dependency between tcf_lock,
and psample_groups_lock that is taken when holding tcf_lock in sample init:
[ 162.108959] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 162.116386] CPU0 CPU1
[ 162.121277] ---- ----
[ 162.126162] lock(psample_groups_lock);
[ 162.130447] local_irq_disable();
[ 162.136772] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock);
[ 162.143957] lock(psample_groups_lock);
[ 162.150813] <Interrupt>
[ 162.153808] lock(&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock);
[ 162.158608]
*** DEADLOCK ***
In order to prevent potential lock inversion dependency between tcf_lock
and psample_groups_lock, extract call to psample_group_get() from tcf_lock
protected section in sample action init function.
Fixes: 4e232818bd32 ("net: sched: act_mirred: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: 764e9a24480f ("net: sched: act_vlan: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: 729e01260989 ("net: sched: act_tunnel_key: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: d77284956656 ("net: sched: act_sample: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: e8917f437006 ("net: sched: act_gact: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: b6a2b971c0b0 ("net: sched: act_csum: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Fixes: 2142236b4584 ("net: sched: act_bpf: remove dependency on rtnl lock")
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions