diff options
| author | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2012-03-10 13:00:07 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> | 2012-03-12 14:21:56 -0400 |
| commit | d663ee73f62903aed334eca25832a76c4a7e4c1c (patch) | |
| tree | 3a8885ee9ddae0c6c18097f2530c42d221e433b0 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c | |
| parent | 10d8f31ebbd6ea9aa8d65d2f04ebef63225052de (diff) | |
iwlwifi: abstract out missing SEQ_RX_FRAME workaround
Mohammed Shafi ran into [1] the SEQ_RX_FRAME workaround
warning with a statistics notification, this means we
can't just remove it as we'd hoped.
Abstract it out so that the higher layer can configure
this as a kind of "filter" in the transport.
[1] http://mid.gmane.org/CAD2nsn1_DzbRHuSbS_1rFNzuux_9pW1-pABEasQ01_y7-ndO5w@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c index 9bc3c73af5e9..8bec0e1ccb54 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c @@ -395,13 +395,17 @@ static void iwl_rx_handle_rxbuf(struct iwl_trans *trans, * there is no command buffer to reclaim. * Ucode should set SEQ_RX_FRAME bit if ucode-originated, * but apparently a few don't get set; catch them here. */ - reclaim = !(pkt->hdr.sequence & SEQ_RX_FRAME) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_RX_PHY_CMD) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_RX) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_RX_MPDU_CMD) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_COMPRESSED_BA) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != STATISTICS_NOTIFICATION) && - (pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_TX); + reclaim = !(pkt->hdr.sequence & SEQ_RX_FRAME); + if (reclaim) { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < trans_pcie->n_no_reclaim_cmds; i++) { + if (trans_pcie->no_reclaim_cmds[i] == pkt->hdr.cmd) { + reclaim = false; + break; + } + } + } sequence = le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.sequence); index = SEQ_TO_INDEX(sequence); @@ -412,17 +416,6 @@ static void iwl_rx_handle_rxbuf(struct iwl_trans *trans, else cmd = NULL; - /* warn if this is cmd response / notification and the uCode - * didn't set the SEQ_RX_FRAME for a frame that is - * uCode-originated - * If you saw this code after the second half of 2012, then - * please remove it - */ - WARN(pkt->hdr.cmd != REPLY_TX && reclaim == false && - (!(pkt->hdr.sequence & SEQ_RX_FRAME)), - "reclaim is false, SEQ_RX_FRAME unset: %s\n", - get_cmd_string(pkt->hdr.cmd)); - err = iwl_op_mode_rx(trans->op_mode, &rxcb, cmd); /* |