net: mscc: ocelot: move net_device related functions to ocelot_net.c

The ocelot hardware library shouldn't contain too much net_device
specific code, since it is shared with DSA which abstracts that
structure away. So much as much of this code as possible into the
mscc_ocelot driver and outside of the common library.

We're making an exception for MDB and LAG code. That is not yet exported
to DSA, but when it will, most of the code that's already in ocelot.c
will remain there. So, there's no point in moving code to ocelot_net.c
just to move it back later.

We could have moved all net_device code to ocelot_vsc7514.c directly,
but let's operate under the assumption that if a new switchdev ocelot
driver gets added, it'll define its SoC-specific stuff in a new
ocelot_vsc*.c file and it'll reuse the rest of the code.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index 99338d27aec0..ad4e8e0d62a4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -249,25 +249,3 @@ int ocelot_cls_flower_stats(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocelot_cls_flower_stats);
-
-int ocelot_setup_tc_cls_flower(struct ocelot_port_private *priv,
-			       struct flow_cls_offload *f,
-			       bool ingress)
-{
-	struct ocelot *ocelot = priv->port.ocelot;
-	int port = priv->chip_port;
-
-	if (!ingress)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	switch (f->command) {
-	case FLOW_CLS_REPLACE:
-		return ocelot_cls_flower_replace(ocelot, port, f, ingress);
-	case FLOW_CLS_DESTROY:
-		return ocelot_cls_flower_destroy(ocelot, port, f, ingress);
-	case FLOW_CLS_STATS:
-		return ocelot_cls_flower_stats(ocelot, port, f, ingress);
-	default:
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-}