diff options
author | Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2010-08-28 19:19:42 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> | 2010-10-24 10:51:46 +0200 |
commit | 9ad17b10011702cb56c5e32e41ecd5fe281c3574 (patch) | |
tree | 8dfeb5b1d8524ad71320be6d2de22a5a63debe3f /arch/x86 | |
parent | 23e7a7944f3779155e2f6bbc831b544eb925f387 (diff) |
KVM: MMU: fix compile warning in audit code
fix:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: In function ‘kvm_mmu_unprotect_page’:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1741: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘gfn_t’
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1745: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘gfn_t’
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: In function ‘mmu_unshadow’:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1761: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘gfn_t’
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: In function ‘set_spte’:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2005: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘gfn_t’
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: In function ‘mmu_set_spte’:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2033: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘gfn_t’
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index b0037a77e56b..59bf1d9553a7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -1738,11 +1738,11 @@ static int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) LIST_HEAD(invalid_list); int r; - pgprintk("%s: looking for gfn %lx\n", __func__, gfn); + pgprintk("%s: looking for gfn %llx\n", __func__, gfn); r = 0; for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(kvm, sp, gfn, node) { - pgprintk("%s: gfn %lx role %x\n", __func__, gfn, + pgprintk("%s: gfn %llx role %x\n", __func__, gfn, sp->role.word); r = 1; kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list); @@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ static void mmu_unshadow(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) LIST_HEAD(invalid_list); for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(kvm, sp, gfn, node) { - pgprintk("%s: zap %lx %x\n", + pgprintk("%s: zap %llx %x\n", __func__, gfn, sp->role.word); kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list); } @@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, goto set_pte; if (mmu_need_write_protect(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) { - pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %lx, marking ro\n", + pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n", __func__, gfn); ret = 1; pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK; @@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int rmap_count; pgprintk("%s: spte %llx access %x write_fault %d" - " user_fault %d gfn %lx\n", + " user_fault %d gfn %llx\n", __func__, *sptep, pt_access, write_fault, user_fault, gfn); @@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, __set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte); kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm); } else if (pfn != spte_to_pfn(*sptep)) { - pgprintk("hfn old %lx new %lx\n", + pgprintk("hfn old %llx new %llx\n", spte_to_pfn(*sptep), pfn); drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte); kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm); @@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, } pgprintk("%s: setting spte %llx\n", __func__, *sptep); - pgprintk("instantiating %s PTE (%s) at %ld (%llx) addr %p\n", + pgprintk("instantiating %s PTE (%s) at %llx (%llx) addr %p\n", is_large_pte(*sptep)? "2MB" : "4kB", *sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK ?"RW":"R", gfn, *sptep, sptep); @@ -3651,9 +3651,9 @@ void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep) if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) { if (!printk_ratelimit()) return; - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no memslot for gfn %ld\n", + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no memslot for gfn %llx\n", audit_msg, gfn); - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: index %ld of sp (gfn=%lx)\n", + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: index %ld of sp (gfn=%llx)\n", audit_msg, (long int)(sptep - rev_sp->spt), rev_sp->gfn); dump_stack(); @@ -3728,7 +3728,7 @@ static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) while (spte) { if (is_writable_pte(*spte)) printk(KERN_ERR "%s: (%s) shadow page has " - "writable mappings: gfn %lx role %x\n", + "writable mappings: gfn %llx role %x\n", __func__, audit_msg, sp->gfn, sp->role.word); spte = rmap_next(vcpu->kvm, rmapp, spte); |