diff options
author | Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> | 2019-12-05 22:44:33 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> | 2019-12-12 22:29:00 +0100 |
commit | 82c881b28aa89215a760e39c5f6bcde2d6ce4918 (patch) | |
tree | c3ca28a49cefcbdf2fcd3d017b2f45bb0816449f /arch/x86/include | |
parent | e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a (diff) |
x86/microcode/AMD: Make stub function static inline
When building with C=1 W=1 (and when CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD=n, as Luc Van
Oostenryck correctly points out) both sparse and gcc complain:
CHECK arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
./arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h:56:6: warning: symbol \
'reload_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static?
CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.o
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c:36:
./arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h:56:6: warning: no previous \
prototype for 'reload_ucode_amd' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
56 | void reload_ucode_amd(void) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And they're right - that function can be a static inline like its
brethren.
Signed-off-by: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/52170.1575603873@turing-police
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h index 209492849566..6685e1218959 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ static inline void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(unsigned int family) {} static inline void load_ucode_amd_ap(unsigned int family) {} static inline int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int family) { return -EINVAL; } -void reload_ucode_amd(void) {} +static inline void reload_ucode_amd(void) {} #endif #endif /* _ASM_X86_MICROCODE_AMD_H */ |