Merge tag 'net-5.11-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

Pull networking fixes from Jakub Kicinski:
 "Networking fixes, including fixes from netfilter, wireless and bpf
  trees.

  Current release - regressions:

   - mt76: fix NULL pointer dereference in mt76u_status_worker and
     mt76s_process_tx_queue

   - net: ipa: fix interconnect enable bug

  Current release - always broken:

   - netfilter: fixes possible oops in mtype_resize in ipset

   - ath11k: fix number of coding issues found by static analysis tools
     and spurious error messages

  Previous releases - regressions:

   - e1000e: re-enable s0ix power saving flows for systems with the
     Intel i219-LM Ethernet controllers to fix power use regression

   - virtio_net: fix recursive call to cpus_read_lock() to avoid a
     deadlock

   - ipv4: ignore ECN bits for fib lookups in fib_compute_spec_dst()

   - sysfs: take the rtnl lock around XPS configuration

   - xsk: fix memory leak for failed bind and rollback reservation at
     NETDEV_TX_BUSY

   - r8169: work around power-saving bug on some chip versions

  Previous releases - always broken:

   - dcb: validate netlink message in DCB handler

   - tun: fix return value when the number of iovs exceeds MAX_SKB_FRAGS
     to prevent unnecessary retries

   - vhost_net: fix ubuf refcount when sendmsg fails

   - bpf: save correct stopping point in file seq iteration

   - ncsi: use real net-device for response handler

   - neighbor: fix div by zero caused by a data race (TOCTOU)

   - bareudp: fix use of incorrect min_headroom size and a false
     positive lockdep splat from the TX lock

   - mvpp2:
      - clear force link UP during port init procedure in case
        bootloader had set it
      - add TCAM entry to drop flow control pause frames
      - fix PPPoE with ipv6 packet parsing
      - fix GoP Networking Complex Control config of port 3
      - fix pkt coalescing IRQ-threshold configuration

   - xsk: fix race in SKB mode transmit with shared cq

   - ionic: account for vlan tag len in rx buffer len

   - stmmac: ignore the second clock input, current clock framework does
     not handle exclusive clock use well, other drivers may reconfigure
     the second clock

  Misc:

   - ppp: change PPPIOCUNBRIDGECHAN ioctl request number to follow
     existing scheme"

* tag 'net-5.11-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (99 commits)
  net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Fix GSWIP_MII_CFG(p) register access
  net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Enable GSWIP_MII_CFG_EN also for internal PHYs
  net: lapb: Decrease the refcount of "struct lapb_cb" in lapb_device_event
  r8169: work around power-saving bug on some chip versions
  net: usb: qmi_wwan: add Quectel EM160R-GL
  selftests: mlxsw: Set headroom size of correct port
  net: macb: Correct usage of MACB_CAPS_CLK_HW_CHG flag
  ibmvnic: fix: NULL pointer dereference.
  docs: networking: packet_mmap: fix old config reference
  docs: networking: packet_mmap: fix formatting for C macros
  vhost_net: fix ubuf refcount incorrectly when sendmsg fails
  bareudp: Fix use of incorrect min_headroom size
  bareudp: set NETIF_F_LLTX flag
  net: hdlc_ppp: Fix issues when mod_timer is called while timer is running
  atlantic: remove architecture depends
  erspan: fix version 1 check in gre_parse_header()
  net: hns: fix return value check in __lb_other_process()
  net: sched: prevent invalid Scell_log shift count
  net: neighbor: fix a crash caused by mod zero
  ipv4: Ignore ECN bits for fib lookups in fib_compute_spec_dst()
  ...

92 files changed, 710 insertions, 411 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
index 4b9ed5874d5a..ae2ae37cd921 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
 netdev FAQ
 ==========
 
-Q: What is netdev?
-------------------
-A: It is a mailing list for all network-related Linux stuff.  This
+What is netdev?
+---------------
+It is a mailing list for all network-related Linux stuff.  This
 includes anything found under net/ (i.e. core code like IPv6) and
 drivers/net (i.e. hardware specific drivers) in the Linux source tree.
 
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ Aside from subsystems like that mentioned above, all network-related
 Linux development (i.e. RFC, review, comments, etc.) takes place on
 netdev.
 
-Q: How do the changes posted to netdev make their way into Linux?
------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: There are always two trees (git repositories) in play.  Both are
+How do the changes posted to netdev make their way into Linux?
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+There are always two trees (git repositories) in play.  Both are
 driven by David Miller, the main network maintainer.  There is the
 ``net`` tree, and the ``net-next`` tree.  As you can probably guess from
 the names, the ``net`` tree is for fixes to existing code already in the
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ for the future release.  You can find the trees here:
 - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
 - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
 
-Q: How often do changes from these trees make it to the mainline Linus tree?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: To understand this, you need to know a bit of background information on
+How often do changes from these trees make it to the mainline Linus tree?
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+To understand this, you need to know a bit of background information on
 the cadence of Linux development.  Each new release starts off with a
 two week "merge window" where the main maintainers feed their new stuff
 to Linus for merging into the mainline tree.  After the two weeks, the
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ focus for ``net`` is on stabilization and bug fixes.
 
 Finally, the vX.Y gets released, and the whole cycle starts over.
 
-Q: So where are we now in this cycle?
+So where are we now in this cycle?
+----------------------------------
 
 Load the mainline (Linus) page here:
 
@@ -91,9 +92,9 @@ and note the top of the "tags" section.  If it is rc1, it is early in
 the dev cycle.  If it was tagged rc7 a week ago, then a release is
 probably imminent.
 
-Q: How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Firstly, think whether you have a bug fix or new "next-like" content.
+How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Firstly, think whether you have a bug fix or new "next-like" content.
 Then once decided, assuming that you use git, use the prefix flag, i.e.
 ::
 
@@ -105,48 +106,45 @@ in the above is just the subject text of the outgoing e-mail, and you
 can manually change it yourself with whatever MUA you are comfortable
 with.
 
-Q: I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it?
---------------------------------------------------------
-Q: How can I tell whether it got merged?
-A: Start by looking at the main patchworks queue for netdev:
+I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it - how can I tell whether it got merged?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Start by looking at the main patchworks queue for netdev:
 
   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
 
 The "State" field will tell you exactly where things are at with your
 patch.
 
-Q: The above only says "Under Review".  How can I find out more?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than
+The above only says "Under Review".  How can I find out more?
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than
 48h).  So be patient.  Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
 patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
 bottom of the priority list.
 
-Q: I submitted multiple versions of the patch series
-----------------------------------------------------
-Q: should I directly update patchwork for the previous versions of these
-patch series?
-A: No, please don't interfere with the patch status on patchwork, leave
+I submitted multiple versions of the patch series. Should I directly update patchwork for the previous versions of these patch series?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+No, please don't interfere with the patch status on patchwork, leave
 it to the maintainer to figure out what is the most recent and current
 version that should be applied. If there is any doubt, the maintainer
 will reply and ask what should be done.
 
-Q: I made changes to only a few patches in a patch series should I resend only those changed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: No, please resend the entire patch series and make sure you do number your
+I made changes to only a few patches in a patch series should I resend only those changed?
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+No, please resend the entire patch series and make sure you do number your
 patches such that it is clear this is the latest and greatest set of patches
 that can be applied.
 
-Q: I submitted multiple versions of a patch series and it looks like a version other than the last one has been accepted, what should I do?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: There is no revert possible, once it is pushed out, it stays like that.
+I submitted multiple versions of a patch series and it looks like a version other than the last one has been accepted, what should I do?
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+There is no revert possible, once it is pushed out, it stays like that.
 Please send incremental versions on top of what has been merged in order to fix
 the patches the way they would look like if your latest patch series was to be
 merged.
 
-Q: How can I tell what patches are queued up for backporting to the various stable releases?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Normally Greg Kroah-Hartman collects stable commits himself, but for
+How can I tell what patches are queued up for backporting to the various stable releases?
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Normally Greg Kroah-Hartman collects stable commits himself, but for
 networking, Dave collects up patches he deems critical for the
 networking subsystem, and then hands them off to Greg.
 
@@ -169,11 +167,9 @@ simply clone the repo, and then git grep the mainline commit ID, e.g.
   releases/3.9.8/ipv6-fix-possible-crashes-in-ip6_cork_release.patch
   stable/stable-queue$
 
-Q: I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Q: Should I request it via stable@vger.kernel.org like the references in
-the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say?
-A: No, not for networking.  Check the stable queues as per above first
+I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable. Should I request it via stable@vger.kernel.org like the references in the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say?
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+No, not for networking.  Check the stable queues as per above first
 to see if it is already queued.  If not, then send a mail to netdev,
 listing the upstream commit ID and why you think it should be a stable
 candidate.
@@ -190,11 +186,9 @@ mainline, the better the odds that it is an OK candidate for stable.  So
 scrambling to request a commit be added the day after it appears should
 be avoided.
 
-Q: I have created a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Q: Should I add a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org like the references in the
-kernel's Documentation/ directory say?
-A: No.  See above answer.  In short, if you think it really belongs in
+I have created a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable. Should I add a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org like the references in the kernel's Documentation/ directory say?
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+No.  See above answer.  In short, if you think it really belongs in
 stable, then ensure you write a decent commit log that describes who
 gets impacted by the bug fix and how it manifests itself, and when the
 bug was introduced.  If you do that properly, then the commit will get
@@ -207,18 +201,18 @@ marker line as described in
 :ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst <the_canonical_patch_format>`
 to temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
 
-Q: Are all networking bug fixes backported to all stable releases?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the
+Are all networking bug fixes backported to all stable releases?
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the
 last two stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable
 branch maintainer is supposed to take care of them. If you find any
 patch is missing from an earlier stable branch, please notify
 stable@vger.kernel.org with either a commit ID or a formal patch
 backported, and CC Dave and other relevant networking developers.
 
-Q: Is the comment style convention different for the networking content?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Yes, in a largely trivial way.  Instead of this::
+Is the comment style convention different for the networking content?
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
+Yes, in a largely trivial way.  Instead of this::
 
   /*
    * foobar blah blah blah
@@ -231,32 +225,30 @@ it is requested that you make it look like this::
    * another line of text
    */
 
-Q: I am working in existing code that has the former comment style and not the latter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Q: Should I submit new code in the former style or the latter?
-A: Make it the latter style, so that eventually all code in the domain
+I am working in existing code that has the former comment style and not the latter. Should I submit new code in the former style or the latter?
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Make it the latter style, so that eventually all code in the domain
 of netdev is of this format.
 
-Q: I found a bug that might have possible security implications or similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Q: Should I mail the main netdev maintainer off-list?**
-A: No. The current netdev maintainer has consistently requested that
+I found a bug that might have possible security implications or similar. Should I mail the main netdev maintainer off-list?
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------