| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Several custom patch commands on parts of an added file would fail with the
confusing error message "error: new file XXX depends on old contents". These
were dropping the custom patch from the original commit, moving the patch to a
new commit, moving it to a later commit, or moving it to the index.
We fix this by converting the patch header from an added file to a diff against
an empty file. We do this not just for the purpose of applying the patch, but
also for rendering it and copying it to the clip board. I'm not sure it matters
much in these cases, but it does feel more correct for a filtered patch to be
presented this way.
|
|
We're going to add another argument in the next commit, and that's getting a bit
much, especially when most of the arguments are bool and you only see true and
false at the call sites without knowing what they mean.
|
|
In go 1.22, loop variables are redeclared with each iteration of the
loop, rather than simple updated on each iteration. This means that we
no longer need to manually redeclare variables when they're closed over
by a function.
|
|
|
|
test: add move_range_to_index
test: add toggle_range
|
|
We're not fully standardising here: different contexts can store their range state however
they like. What we are standardising on is that now the view is always responsible for
highlighting the selected lines, meaning the context/controller needs to tell the view
where the range start is.
Two convenient benefits from this change:
1) we no longer need bespoke code in integration tests for asserting on selected lines because
we can just ask the view
2) line selection in staging/patch-building/merge-conflicts views now look the same as in
list views i.e. the highlight applies to the whole line (including trailing space)
I also noticed a bug with merge conflicts not rendering the selection on focus though I suspect
it wasn't a bug with any real consequences when the view wasn't displaying the selection.
I'm going to scrap the selectedRangeBgColor config and just let it use the single line
background color. Hopefully nobody cares, but there's really no need for an extra config.
|
|
Previously, when pressing right-arrow when the cursor is already in the last
hunk, it would jump back to the beginning of that hunk. This can be confusing if
the hunk is long, maybe the start of the hunk is already scrolled off the top of
the window, and then pressing right-arrow actually scrolls *backwards*, which is
counter-intuitive. It's better to do nothing in this case.
Same for left-arrow when the cursor is already in the first hunk, although here
the problem is not so severe (unless diff context was increased by a huge
amount, and the start of the first hunk is scrolled off the bottom of the
window).
|
|
This fixes a regression that was introduced in 73c7dc9c5d00.
|
|
There's a bug in LineNumberOfLine, but the existing test coverage doesn't catch
it, as the only test case for this was one where oldStart and newStart were the
same for all hunks. Add a test case where newStart is different for one of the
hunks; this demonstrates a bug, where all expected results from index 12 on are
off by one.
|
|
We've been sometimes using lo and sometimes using my slices package, and we need to pick one
for consistency. Lo is more extensive and better maintained so we're going with that.
My slices package was a superset of go's own slices package so in some places I've just used
the official one (the methods were just wrappers anyway).
I've also moved the remaining methods into the utils package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the only "reverse"-related option that is left, so use a less clumsy
name for it.
|
|
All callers pass false now (except for the tests, which we simply remove), so we
don't need the option any more.
|
|
This fixes the problem that patching would stop at the first file that has a
conflict. We always want to patch all files.
Also, it's faster for large patches, and the code is a little bit simpler too.
|
|
All callers in this file now use reverseOnGenerate=false and
keepOriginalHeader=true, so hard-code that in the call to ModifiedPatchForLines
and get rid of the parameters.
|
|
The loop is pointless for two reasons:
- git apply --3way has this fallback built in already. If it can't do a
three-way merge, it will fall back to applying the patch normally.
- However, the only situation where it does this is when it can't do a 3-way
merge at all because it can't find the necessary ancestor blob. This can only
happen if you transfer a patch between different repos that don't have the
same blobs available; we are applying the patch to the same repo that is was
just generated from, so a 3-way merge is always possible. (Now that we fixed
the bug in the previous commit, that is.)
But the retry loop is not only pointless, it was actually harmful, because when
a 3-way patch fails with a conflict, git will put conflict markers in the
patched file and then exit with a non-zero exit status. So the retry loop would
try to patch the already patched file again, and this almost certainly fails,
but with a cryptic error message such as "error: main.go: does not exist in
index".
|
|
There's no reason to have two different ways of applying patches for whole-file
patches and partial patches; use --reverse for both. Not only does this simplify
the code a bit, but it fixes an actual problem: when reverseOnGenerate and
keepOriginalHeader are both true, the generated patch header is broken (the two
blobs in the line `index 6d1959b..6dc5f84 100644` are swapped). Git fails to do
a proper three-way merge in that case, as it expects the first of the two blobs
to be the common ancestor.
It would be possible to fix this by extending ModifiedPatchForLines to swap the
two blobs in this case; but this would prevent us from concatenating all patches
and apply them in one go, which we are going to do later in the branch.
|
|
It's not used yet, but covered with tests already.
|
|
We are going to add one more flag in the next commit.
Note that we are not using the struct inside patch_manager.go; we keep passing
the individual flags there. The reason for this will become more obvious later
in this branch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
