diff options
-rw-r--r-- | buffered-reader/src/lib.rs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | ffi/src/net.rs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | openpgp/src/armor.rs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | openpgp/src/cert/mod.rs | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | openpgp/src/packet/signature/subpacket.rs | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | openpgp/src/policy.rs | 4 |
6 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/buffered-reader/src/lib.rs b/buffered-reader/src/lib.rs index 92cfcc66..7c5ec322 100644 --- a/buffered-reader/src/lib.rs +++ b/buffered-reader/src/lib.rs @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ pub trait BufferedReader<C> : io::Read + fmt::Debug + fmt::Display { /// impl <T: BufferedReader> std::io::Read for T { ... } /// ``` /// -/// but, alas, Rust doesn't like that ("error[E0119]: conflicting +/// but, alas, Rust doesn't like that ("error\[E0119\]: conflicting /// implementations of trait `std::io::Read` for type `&mut _`"). pub fn buffered_reader_generic_read_impl<T: BufferedReader<C>, C> (bio: &mut T, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize, io::Error> { diff --git a/ffi/src/net.rs b/ffi/src/net.rs index f40de413..52fc7982 100644 --- a/ffi/src/net.rs +++ b/ffi/src/net.rs @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ //! //! [SKS keyserver]: https://www.sks-keyservers.net/overview-of-pools.php#pool_hkps //! -//! ```c, no-run +//! ```c //! #include <sequoia.h> //! //! sq_context_t ctx; diff --git a/openpgp/src/armor.rs b/openpgp/src/armor.rs index 812169c3..b3692154 100644 --- a/openpgp/src/armor.rs +++ b/openpgp/src/armor.rs @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ impl Kind { /// This does not include any trailing newline. It is simply the /// length of: /// - /// ```norun + /// ```text /// -----BEGIN PGP BLUB ----- /// ``` fn header_len(&self) -> usize { diff --git a/openpgp/src/cert/mod.rs b/openpgp/src/cert/mod.rs index 7e532b64..4d2747b0 100644 --- a/openpgp/src/cert/mod.rs +++ b/openpgp/src/cert/mod.rs @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ type UnknownBundles = ComponentBundles<Unknown>; /// create a direct key signature with this information. /// /// [Section 5.2.3.3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-5.2.3.3 -/// [WKD] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-openpgp-webkey-service-09#section-5 +/// [WKD]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-openpgp-webkey-service-09#section-5 /// [without any User ID packets]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-09#section-11.1 /// /// # Algorithm Preferences @@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ impl Cert { /// [`ValidCert`]: cert/struct.ValidCert.html /// [`ValidateAmalgamation`]: cert/amalgamation/trait.ValidateAmalgamation.html /// [`ValidCert::alive`]: cert/struct.ValidCert.html#method.alive - /// [`ValidCert::revocation_status`]: cert/struct.ValidCert.html#method.revocation_status + /// [`ValidCert::revoked`]: cert/struct.ValidCert.html#method.revoked /// /// # Examples /// diff --git a/openpgp/src/packet/signature/subpacket.rs b/openpgp/src/packet/signature/subpacket.rs index 0e8acb79..b37d2a35 100644 --- a/openpgp/src/packet/signature/subpacket.rs +++ b/openpgp/src/packet/signature/subpacket.rs @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ pub enum SubpacketTag { IssuerFingerprint, /// Preferred AEAD Algorithms. PreferredAEADAlgorithms, - /// Intended Recipient Fingerprint [proposed]. + /// Intended Recipient Fingerprint (proposed). IntendedRecipient, /// Reserved subpacket tag. Reserved(u8), @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ pub enum SubpacketValue { IssuerFingerprint(Fingerprint), /// Preferred AEAD Algorithms. PreferredAEADAlgorithms(Vec<AEADAlgorithm>), - /// Intended Recipient Fingerprint [proposed]. + /// Intended Recipient Fingerprint (proposed). IntendedRecipient(Fingerprint), /// This marks this enum as non-exhaustive. Do not use this diff --git a/openpgp/src/policy.rs b/openpgp/src/policy.rs index 550b68c0..259099d2 100644 --- a/openpgp/src/policy.rs +++ b/openpgp/src/policy.rs @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ //! considered weak (e.g. SHA-1). When dealing with data from an //! untrusted source, for instance, callers will often prefer to //! ignore signatures that rely on these algorithms even though [RFC -//! 4880] says that "[i]mplementations MUST implement SHA-1." When +//! 4880] says that "\[i\]mplementations MUST implement SHA-1." When //! trying to decrypt old archives, however, users probably don't want //! to ignore keys using MD5, even though [RFC 4880] deprecates MD5. //! @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ //! `StandardPolicy`'s parameters. //! //! When implementing the `Policy` trait, it is *essential* that the -//! functions are [idempotent]. That is, if the same `Policy` is used +//! functions are [pure]. That is, if the same `Policy` is used //! to determine whether a given `Signature` is valid, it must always //! return the same value. //! |