From 6025001707fd65679d758c877200469d4e72ea88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: klemens Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:56:58 +0200 Subject: spelling fixes, just comments and readme. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell Reviewed-by: Rich Salz (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1413) --- crypto/aes/asm/aes-ia64.S | 2 +- crypto/aes/asm/aes-ppc.pl | 2 +- crypto/aes/asm/aesni-sha256-x86_64.pl | 2 +- crypto/aes/asm/aesni-x86_64.pl | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'crypto/aes') diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ia64.S b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ia64.S index ef44f7cc76..f7f1f63c9d 100644 --- a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ia64.S +++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ia64.S @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ // 'and' which in turn can be assigned to M-port [there're double as // much M-ports as there're I-ports on Itanium 2]. By sacrificing few // registers for small constants (255, 24 and 16) to be used with -// 'shr' and 'and' instructions I can achieve better ILP, Intruction +// 'shr' and 'and' instructions I can achieve better ILP, Instruction // Level Parallelism, and performance. This code outperforms GCC 3.3 // generated code by over factor of 2 (two), GCC 3.4 - by 70% and // HP C - by 40%. Measured best-case scenario, i.e. aligned diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ppc.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ppc.pl index d02dde5bc5..1558d8e454 100644 --- a/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ppc.pl +++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aes-ppc.pl @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ # February 2010 # # Rescheduling instructions to favour Power6 pipeline gave 10% -# performance improvement on the platfrom in question (and marginal +# performance improvement on the platform in question (and marginal # improvement even on others). It should be noted that Power6 fails # to process byte in 18 cycles, only in 23, because it fails to issue # 4 load instructions in two cycles, only in 3. As result non-compact diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-sha256-x86_64.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-sha256-x86_64.pl index e9ad24f7d7..a5fde2e4d1 100644 --- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-sha256-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-sha256-x86_64.pl @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ # Skylake 2.62/3.14/3.62+7.70 8.10 +27%/34%/40% # Bulldozer 5.77/6.89/8.00+13.7 13.7 +42%/50%/58% # -# (*) there are XOP, AVX1 and AVX2 code pathes, meaning that +# (*) there are XOP, AVX1 and AVX2 code paths, meaning that # Westmere is omitted from loop, this is because gain was not # estimated high enough to justify the effort; # (**) these are EVP-free results, results obtained with 'speed diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-x86_64.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-x86_64.pl index a03da20a5a..25dd120dd2 100644 --- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesni-x86_64.pl @@ -4239,7 +4239,7 @@ ___ # Vinodh Gopal # Kahraman Akdemir # -# Agressively optimized in respect to aeskeygenassist's critical path +# Aggressively optimized in respect to aeskeygenassist's critical path # and is contained in %xmm0-5 to meet Win64 ABI requirement. # # int ${PREFIX}_set_encrypt_key(const unsigned char *inp, -- cgit v1.2.3