From 02cc82ff8adbb43918720796c97df36ac0579323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:37:02 +0000
Subject: I forgot there was a reason why the inclusions and definition of
 u_int was made in a certain sequence.  This change restores the earlier
 "chain of command".

---
 apps/s_socket.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'apps/s_socket.c')

diff --git a/apps/s_socket.c b/apps/s_socket.c
index adaeef646a..bd499d020c 100644
--- a/apps/s_socket.c
+++ b/apps/s_socket.c
@@ -62,13 +62,6 @@
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <signal.h>
 
-#define USE_SOCKETS
-#define NON_MAIN
-#include "apps.h"
-#undef USE_SOCKETS
-#undef NON_MAIN
-#include "s_apps.h"
-#include <openssl/ssl.h>
 #include <openssl/e_os2.h>
 
 /* With IPv6, it looks like Digital has mixed up the proper order of
@@ -80,6 +73,14 @@
 typedef unsigned int u_int;
 #endif
 
+#define USE_SOCKETS
+#define NON_MAIN
+#include "apps.h"
+#undef USE_SOCKETS
+#undef NON_MAIN
+#include "s_apps.h"
+#include <openssl/ssl.h>
+
 static struct hostent *GetHostByName(char *name);
 #ifdef OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS
 static void sock_cleanup(void);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3