Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
This must fail with DH_CHECK_INVALID_Q_VALUE and
with DH_CHECK_Q_NOT_PRIME unset.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21550)
(cherry picked from commit ad5d35572695d7b5748b2bd4fb1afaa189b29e28)
(cherry picked from commit 1478ffad3f123550ec1014642d5c880dfbe270ef)
|
|
When an early error happens in the test_pipelining
function and idx == 5 the error handling would try
to call OPENSSL_free(msg), but msg is at that time
just a string constant in read-only memory, so a
crash would be the result. Fixed that by using
fragsize as an indication when to free msg.
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21512)
(cherry picked from commit 06a0d40322e96dbba816b35f82226871f635ec5a)
|
|
Confirm that the only errors DH_check() finds with DH parameters with an
excessively long modulus is that the modulus is too large. We should not
be performing time consuming checks using that modulus.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21451)
(cherry picked from commit ede782b4c8868d1f09c9cd237f82b6f35b7dba8b)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21401)
(cherry picked from commit f1b7243cda208d8bd74f75c95990f8205e977ae4)
|
|
Test various scenarios for a write retry occuring during a handshake.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21435)
(cherry picked from commit d6179e6d35af663ca41de615f35a1200a35f85e8)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21384)
(cherry picked from commit 3993bb0c0c87e3ed0ab4274e4688aa814e164cfc)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21295)
(cherry picked from commit 5cd269461ac7a7920299232b1c1b9857c1e1908f)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21272)
(cherry picked from commit 810f7dc1c7cc5441097b398f753e33652848a4cc)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21197)
(cherry picked from commit 1a27cc3626bd15f8fd9a26a2dbc59a681d505321)
|
|
Test that if the client sends a key share for a group in the server's
supported_group list but is otherwise invalid, that we don't select it
in the HRR.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21163)
(cherry picked from commit adf33f9e268b17ec1b4739707abb40b03b21ea6a)
|
|
Refer SP 800-131Ar2 table 2:
https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-131a/rev-2/final
Fixes #21185
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21186)
(cherry picked from commit 71cf587ea21c1422640847e358019a51806d2811)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21151)
(cherry picked from commit 8a2e74d0536c91585fbe789e0ab7b06cab0289c2)
|
|
Fixes #21123
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21127)
(cherry picked from commit 8229874476cc2955e6947cf6d3fee09e13b8c160)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
This is an alternative to #20893
Additionally this fixes also a possible issue in UI_UTIL_read_pw:
When UI_new returns NULL, the result code would still be zero
as if UI_UTIL_read_pw succeeded, but the password buffer is left
uninitialized, with subsequent possible stack corruption or worse.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20957)
(cherry picked from commit a64c48cff88e032cf9513578493c4536df725a22)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20832)
(cherry picked from commit e0f1ec3b2ec1b137695abc3199a62def5965351f)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20832)
(cherry picked from commit 2d6585986f3b754750b25e7a296a08e7129a5320)
|
|
Fixes #20889
There was an incorrect value passed to EC_POINT_point2oct() for the
buffer size of the param passed-in.
Added testcases.
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yi1.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20890)
(cherry picked from commit 91070877adb905f51eb4b19b730d42fc257bae13)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20848)
(cherry picked from commit 9fdf9a44bbe3827fe653165a07281ccae8ab0947)
|
|
Signed-off-by: Liu-ErMeng <liuermeng2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20797)
(cherry picked from commit 4df13d1054e143f1cbf13fa347491807289f87b7)
|
|
The logic for handling inconsistent use of -rspin etc., -port, -server,
and -use_mock_srv options proved faulty. This is fixed here, updating and
correcting also the documentation and diagnostics of the involved options.
In particular, the case that -rspin (or -rspout. reqin, -reqout) does not
provide enough message file names was not properly described and handled.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20295)
(cherry picked from commit 1f757df1f3de0c18cc22a4992d66e9a7b113f61d)
|
|
requests in a transaction
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20257)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20257)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20298)
(cherry picked from commit 25b18e629d5cab40f88b33fd9ecf0d69e08c7707)
|
|
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20731)
(cherry picked from commit 8835940db58229fc467cdea1eebf3f064352a086)
|
|
Fixes #20693
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20708)
(cherry picked from commit efbff4de3e259cee71a4e1bbd86b30ebd86bbdae)
|
|
Related to #20268
DSA_sign() assumes that the signature passed in is related to DSA_size().
If q is negative then DSA_size() actually fails and returns 0.
A test that tries to allocate the signature buffer using DSA_size() and then
pass it to DSA_sign() will then either.
(1) Have a signature buffer of NULL. In this case it was leaking data
returned via i2d_DSA_SIG.
(2) Cause a seg fault because we created a buffer that was not large
enough to hold the signature. As it already checked zero we also now
check for negative values also.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20553)
(cherry picked from commit 9559ad0e8d433a2a212b63cc848fa2ac82a9b048)
(cherry picked from commit ce90b5ed8b0849a77336b8ea81ba7983d11e8700)
|
|
Similiar to the issue found in PR #20553 for DSA_sign().
ECDSA_sign() leaked memory if the signature was NULL
when i2d_ECDSA_SIG was called.
Note that this does not affect the higher level EVP
functions as they correctly handle NULL.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20554)
(cherry picked from commit 4befe81a99b89c52b749a87eece82c1cba4fab12)
(cherry picked from commit 680b4be65eba2658c1d807dd9838ca88301bb7dd)
|
|
We had a test for a handshake record appearing before epoch change, and
a test for an app data record appearing before Finished - but not one for
the app data record appearing before epoch change.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20638)
|
|
Test that a valid certificate policy is accepted and that an invalid
certificate policy is rejected. Specifically we are checking that a
leaf certificate with an invalid policy is detected.
Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
|
|
Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20204)
(cherry picked from commit f1e144f277fd98a0fde73b884aae541fdc73d063)
|
|
If there is no EC specified, the test won't pass.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20572)
(cherry picked from commit f5935fcf8e4bc2191ac4a32e5b7ec32817642f1e)
|
|
These trees have pathological properties with respect to building. The small
tree stays within the imposed limit, the large tree doesn't.
The large tree would consume over 150Gb of RAM to process.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
|
|
If we reject early data then it is normal for decryption operations to
fail. We should ensure there are no spurious errors on the stack in that
case. This adds a test for that scenario.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20442)
(cherry picked from commit 85e247ebc08c07ed4a86f8a128ddceeb3f48bcbc)
|
|
A bad merge from #20208 into the 3.0 branch caused a build break.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20441)
|
|
Coverage testing showed that ossl_ffc_params_fromdata() was not setting
OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_FFC_DIGEST_PROPS.
Adding a negative test also showed that ossl_ffc_params_copy() did not
do a shallow copy of the digest or digest property.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20385)
(cherry picked from commit 3307338e26862070eaacad6ec7537a63a63b8a90)
|
|
Fixes #20268
Values such as q=1 or priv=0 caused infinite loops when calling
DSA_sign() without these changes.
There are other cases where bad domain parameters may have caused
infinite loops where the retry counter has been added. The simpler case
of priv=0 also hits this case. q=1 caused an infinite loop in the setup.
The max retry value has been set to an arbitrary value of 8 (it is
unlikely to ever do a single retry for valid values).
The minimum q bits was set to an arbitrary value of 128 (160 is still
used for legacy reasons when using 512 bit keys).
Thanks @guidovranken for detecting this, and @davidben for his
insightful analysis.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20384)
(cherry picked from commit 3a4e09ab42654b3d223f0f8dd1a9c58b2902ddcc)
|
|
TLS pipelining provides the ability for libssl to read or write multiple
records in parallel. It requires special ciphers to do this, and there are
currently no built-in ciphers that provide this capability. However, the
dasync engine does have such a cipher, so we add a test for this capability
using that engine.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20208)
(cherry picked from commit 24c7d367b612fc5a4a84571da1e54a01a6ee813f)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20341)
(cherry picked from commit 0aa7d7f42bc757a0993739b6cfdc8819a70d22ef)
(cherry picked from commit ed8d2c9948f25988feb854e805b3403f592d7359)
|
|
The test tries to use DES but that may not be available.
But for the purpose of regression testing CVE-2023-0215
the cipher is not relevant, so we use AES-128 instead.
Fixes #20249
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20276)
(cherry picked from commit c400a1fe477b44a5eacbad2be8d50f2eaa92925c)
|
|
Also add corresponding tests and to this end update credentials
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20160)
(cherry picked from commit 6b58f498b3f5d8e4c9197c3c5228fb450e33aaaf)
|
|
Two key 3DES only sets two keys and the random generation errors out if fewer
than three keys are required. It shouldn't.
Fixes #20212
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20224)
(cherry picked from commit 587e0407803af330c0b04238fcbce78521ce35d7)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
|
|
Fixes CVE-2023-0217
When attempting to do a BN_Copy of params->p there was no NULL check.
Since BN_copy does not check for NULL this is a NULL reference.
As an aside BN_cmp() does do a NULL check, so there are other checks
that fail because a NULL is passed. A more general check for NULL params
has been added for both FFC public and private key validation instead.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
|