Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Found by running the checkpatch.pl Linux script to enforce coding style.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21468)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Release: yes
|
|
OSSL_PARAM.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20205)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19429)
|
|
Fixes #16989
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17065)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16801)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16918)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15468)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15108)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14785)
|
|
The existing names such as EVP_PKEY_param_fromdata_settable were a bit
confusing since the 'param' referred to key params not OSSL_PARAM. To simplify
the interface a 'selection' parameter will be passed instead. The
changes are:
(1) EVP_PKEY_fromdata_init() replaces both EVP_PKEY_key_fromdata_init() and EVP_PKEY_param_fromdata_init().
(2) EVP_PKEY_fromdata() has an additional selection parameter.
(3) EVP_PKEY_fromdata_settable() replaces EVP_PKEY_key_fromdata_settable() and EVP_PKEY_param_fromdata_settable().
EVP_PKEY_fromdata_settable() also uses a selection parameter.
Fixes #12989
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14076)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13139)
|
|
Co-author: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Co-author: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13139)
|
|
This was added for backward compatability.
Added EC_GROUP_new_from_params() that supports explicit curve parameters.
This fixes the 15-test_genec.t TODO.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12604)
|
|
Minor changes to `custom_generator_test`:
- this is to align to the 1.1.1 version of the test (simplify the code
as there is no need to use `EC_GROUP_get_field_type()`)
- add comment to explain how the buffer size is computed
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12507)
|
|
This commit adds a new test (run on all the built-in curves) to create
`EC_GROUP` with **unknown** *explicit parameters*: from a built-in group
we create an alternative group from scratch that differs in the
generator used.
At the `EC_GROUP` layer we perform a basic math check to ensure that the
math on the alternative group still makes sense, using comparable
results from the origin group.
We then create two `EC_KEY` objects on top of this alternative group and
run key generation from the `EC_KEY` layer.
Then we promote these two `EC_KEY`s to `EVP_PKEY` objects and try to
run the derive operation at the highest abstraction layer, comparing
results in both directions.
Finally, we create provider-native keys using `EVP_PKEY_fromdata` and
data derived from the previous objects, we compute an equivalent shared
secret from these provider keys, and compare it to the result obtained
from the previous steps.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12507)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12096)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11928)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11851)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11807)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11527)
|
|
Adds tests for each curve to ensure that encodings obtained through
EC_POINT_hex2point() can be fed to EC_POINT_point2hex() yielding a point
identical to the one from which the encoding is generated.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10329)
|
|
Add a new API to test for primes that can't be misused, deprecated the
old APIs.
Suggested by Jake Massimo and Kenneth Paterson
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
GH: #9272
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9821)
|
|
- Replace a `TEST_true()` with `!TEST_false()` to avoid reporting
confusing errors
- We tend to use `if (!TEST_foo() || !TEST_bar())` and it's a bit
confusing to switch to `if(!(TEST_foo() && TEST_bar()))`: replace it
with the more common style
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9813)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9813)
|
|
Description
-----------
Upon `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()` check if the parameters match any
of the built-in curves. If that is the case, return a new
`EC_GROUP_new_by_curve_name()` object instead of the explicit parameters
`EC_GROUP`.
This affects all users of `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`:
- direct calls to `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`
- direct calls to `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters()` with an explicit
parameters argument
- ASN.1 parsing of explicit parameters keys (as it eventually
ends up calling `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters()`)
A parsed explicit parameter key will still be marked with the
`OPENSSL_EC_EXPLICIT_CURVE` ASN.1 flag on load, so, unless
programmatically forced otherwise, if the key is eventually serialized
the output will still be encoded with explicit parameters, even if
internally it is treated as a named curve `EC_GROUP`.
Before this change, creating any `EC_GROUP` object using
`EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`, yielded an object associated with
the default generic `EC_METHOD`, but this was never guaranteed in the
documentation.
After this commit, users of the library that intentionally want to
create an `EC_GROUP` object using a specific `EC_METHOD` can still
explicitly call `EC_GROUP_new(foo_method)` and then manually set the
curve parameters using `EC_GROUP_set_*()`.
Motivation
----------
This has obvious performance benefits for the built-in curves with
specialized `EC_METHOD`s and subtle but important security benefits:
- the specialized methods have better security hardening than the
generic implementations
- optional fields in the parameter encoding, like the `cofactor`, cannot
be leveraged by an attacker to force execution of the less secure
code-paths for single point scalar multiplication
- in general, this leads to reducing the attack surface
Check the manuscript at https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01785 for an in depth
analysis of the issues related to this commit.
It should be noted that `libssl` does not allow to negotiate explicit
parameters (as per RFC 8422), so it is not directly affected by the
consequences of using explicit parameters that this commit fixes.
On the other hand, we detected external applications and users in the
wild that use explicit parameters by default (and sometimes using 0 as
the cofactor value, which is technically not a valid value per the
specification, but is tolerated by parsers for wider compatibility given
that the field is optional).
These external users of `libcrypto` are exposed to these vulnerabilities
and their security will benefit from this commit.
Related commits
---------------
While this commit is beneficial for users using built-in curves and
explicit parameters encoding for serialized keys, commit
b783beeadf6b80bc431e6f3230b5d5585c87ef87 (and its equivalents for the
1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 stable branches) fixes the consequences of the
invalid cofactor values more in general also for other curves
(CVE-2019-1547).
The following list covers commits in `master` that are related to the
vulnerabilities presented in the manuscript motivating this commit:
- d2baf88c43 [crypto/rsa] Set the constant-time flag in multi-prime RSA too
- 311e903d84 [crypto/asn1] Fix multiple SCA vulnerabilities during RSA key validation.
- b783beeadf [crypto/ec] for ECC parameters with NULL or zero cofactor, compute it
- 724339ff44 Fix SCA vulnerability when using PVK and MSBLOB key formats
Note that the PRs that contributed the listed commits also include other
commits providing related testing and documentation, in addition to
links to PRs and commits backporting the fixes to the 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and
1.1.1 branches.
Responsible Disclosure
----------------------
This and the other issues presented in https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01785
were reported by Cesar Pereida García, Sohaib ul Hassan, Nicola Tuveri,
Iaroslav Gridin, Alejandro Cabrera Aldaya and Billy Bob Brumley from the
NISEC group at Tampere University, FINLAND.
The OpenSSL Security Team evaluated the security risk for this
vulnerability as low, and encouraged to propose fixes using public Pull
Requests.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9808)
|
|
This is a forward port from
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9781
for the test logic introduced by
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9727
As @mattcaswell commented
(https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9781#discussion_r321621541):
> These `TEST_true` calls should be `!TEST_false` because we are
> *expecting* a failure.
> The difference is that the test framework will print error details if
> the test doesn't give the expected answer.
> So by using `TEST_true` instead of `!TEST_false` we'll get error
> details printed, but the test will succeed anyway.
(cherry picked from commit e8aafc891d9bd7fa1cce0401d858ef842f09b49e)
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9797)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9827)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9380)
|
|
[extended tests]
This is a temporary workaround for issue #9251, which contains a full
discussion of the real problem.
As a temporary workaround, we test `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`
against a curve that does not currently have alternative
implementations.
The proper fix is dependant on resolution of issue #8615
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9474)
|
|
Once there are buildable fips tests, some tests that are data driven
from files will need to be modified to exclude non approved curves in
fips mode.
These changes were tested by temporarily adding #define FIPS_MODE 1 to
all the modified source files.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9081)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <yang.yang@baishancloud.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8792)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8564)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8555)
|
|
This fixes the "verifying the alias" case.
Actually, while working on it, I realized that conceptually we were
testing the 2 different behaviours of `EC_GROUP_check_named_curve()` at
the same time, and actually not in the proper way.
I think it's fair to assume that overwriting the curve name for an
existing group with `NID_undef` could lead to the unexpected behaviour
we were observing and working around.
Thus I decided to separate the lookup test in a dedicated simpler test
that does what the documentation of `EC_GROUP_check_named_curve()`
suggests: the lookup functionality is meant to find a name for a group
generated with explicit parameters.
In case an alternative alias is returned by the lookup instead of the
expected nid, to avoid doing comparisons between `EC_GROUP`s with
different `EC_METHOD`s, the workaround is to retrieve the `ECPARAMETERS`
of the "alias group" and create a new explicit parameters group to use
in `EC_GROUP_cmp()`.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8555)
|
|
Setting arbitrary `p`, `a` or `b` with `EC_GROUP_set_curve()` might fail
for some `EC_GROUP`s, depending on the internal `EC_METHOD`
implementation, hence the block of tests verifying that
`EC_GROUP_check_named_curve()` fails when any of the curve parameters is
changed is modified to run only if the previous `EC_GROUP_set_curve()`
call succeeds.
`ERR_set_mark()` and `ERR_pop_to_mark()` are used to avoid littering the
thread error stack with unrelated errors happened during
`EC_GROUP_set_curve()`.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8555)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8555)
|
|
Fixes #8462
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8466)
|
|
The previous commit fixed an underflow that may occur in ecp_nistp521.c.
This commit adds a test for that condition. It is heavily based on an
original test harness by Billy Brumley.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8405)
|
|
New function to return internal pointer for field.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8195)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7767)
|
|
Fixes #6646
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6815)
|
|
and catch corner cases better and earlier
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6690)
|
|
Fix prototype warnings triggered by -Wstrict-prototypes when configuring
with `enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128`
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6556)
|
|
Per SEC 1, the curve coefficients must be padded up to size. See C.2's
definition of Curve, C.1's definition of FieldElement, and 2.3.5's definition
of how to encode the field elements in http://www.secg.org/sec1-v2.pdf.
This comes up for P-521, where b needs a leading zero.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6314)
|
|
felem_neg does not produce an output within the tight bounds suitable
for felem_contract. This affects build configurations which set
enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128.
point_double and point_add, in the non-z*_is_zero cases, tolerate and
fix up the wider bounds, so this only affects point_add calls where the
other point is infinity. Thus it only affects the final addition in
arbitrary-point multiplication, giving the wrong y-coordinate. This is a
no-op for ECDH and ECDSA, which only use the x-coordinate of
arbitrary-point operations.
Note: ecp_nistp521.c has the same issue in that the documented
preconditions are violated by the test case. I have not addressed this
in this PR. ecp_nistp521.c does not immediately produce the wrong
answer; felem_contract there appears to be a bit more tolerant than its
documented preconditions. However, I haven't checked the point_add
property above holds. ecp_nistp521.c should either get this same fix, to
be conservative, or have the bounds analysis and comments reworked for
the wider bounds.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5779)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5689)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5470)
|