| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The new naming scheme consistently usese the `OSSL_FUNC_` prefix for all
functions which are dispatched between the core and providers.
This change includes in particular all up- and downcalls, i.e., the
dispatched functions passed from core to provider and vice versa.
- OSSL_core_ -> OSSL_FUNC_core_
- OSSL_provider_ -> OSSL_FUNC_core_
For operations and their function dispatch tables, the following convention
is used:
Type | Name (evp_generic_fetch(3)) |
---------------------|-----------------------------------|
operation | OSSL_OP_FOO |
function id | OSSL_FUNC_FOO_FUNCTION_NAME |
function "name" | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name |
function typedef | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name_fn |
function ptr getter | OSSL_FUNC_foo_function_name |
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12222)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12222)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11682)
|
|
With capabilities we can query a provider about what it can do.
Initially we support a "TLS-GROUP" capability.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11914)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12043)
|
|
A provider could be linked against a different version of libcrypto than
the version of libcrypto that loaded the provider. Different versions of
libcrypto could define opaque types differently. It must never occur that
a type created in one libcrypto is used directly by the other libcrypto.
This will cause crashes.
We can "cheat" for "built-in" providers that are part of libcrypto itself,
because we know that the two libcrypto versions are the same - but not for
other providers.
To ensure this does not occur we use different types names for the handful
of opaque types that are passed between the core and providers.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11758)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11839)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11710)
|
|
The provider context structure is made to include the following information:
- The core provider handle (first argument to the provider init
function). This handle is meant to be used in all upcalls that need
it.
- A library context, used for any libcrypto calls that need it, done in
the provider itself.
Regarding the library context, that's generally only needed if the
provider makes any libcrypto calls, i.e. is linked with libcrypto. That
happens to be the case for all OpenSSL providers, but is applicable for
other providers that use libcrypto internally as well.
The normal thing to do for a provider init function is to create its own
library context. For a provider that's meant to become a dynamically
loadable module, this is what MUST be done.
However, we do not do that in the default provider; it uses the library
context associated with the core provider handle instead. This is
permissible, although generally discouraged, as long as the provider in
question is guaranteed to be built-in, into libcrypto or into the
application that uses it.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11803)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11328)
|
|
At the moment we only provider support for these algorithms in the default
provider. These algorithms only support "one shot" EVP_DigestSign() and
EVP_DigestVerify() as per the existing libcrypto versions.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11261)
|
|
This includes legacy PSS controls to params conversion, and an attempt
to generalise the parameter names when they are suitable for more than
one operation.
Also added crypto/rsa/rsa_aid.c, containing proper AlgorithmIdentifiers
for known RSA+hash function combinations.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10557)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10964)
|
|
Because the libcrypto code has relinquished control of exact words to
express padding mode choices, we re-implement them in the appropriate
provider implementation.
For the sake of legacy controls, we maintain support for the numeric
form of the padding mode, but leave that support otherwise undeclared.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10947)
|
|
Also Add ability for providers to dynamically exclude cipher algorithms.
Cipher algorithms are only returned from providers if their capable() method is either NULL,
or the method returns 1.
This is mainly required for ciphers that only have hardware implementations.
If there is no hardware support, then the algorithm needs to be not available.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10146)
|
|
The idea to have all these things in providers/common was viable as
long as the implementations was spread around their main providers.
This is, however, no longer the case, so we move the common blocks
closer to the source that use them.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10564)
|
|
In TLSv1.2 a pre-master secret value is passed from the client to the
server encrypted using RSA PKCS1 type 2 padding in a ClientKeyExchange
message. As well as the normal formatting rules for RSA PKCA1 type 2
padding TLS imposes some additional rules about what constitutes a well
formed key. Specifically it must be exactly the right length and
encode the TLS version originally requested by the client (as opposed to
the actual negotiated version) in its first two bytes.
All of these checks need to be done in constant time and, if they fail,
then the TLS implementation is supposed to continue anyway with a random
key (and therefore the connection will fail later on). This avoids
padding oracle type attacks.
This commit implements this within the RSA padding code so that we keep
all the constant time padding logic in one place. A later commit will
remove it from libssl.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10411)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10394)
|
|
To support generic output of public keys wrapped in a X509_PUBKEY,
additional PEM and i2d/d2i routines are added for that type.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10394)
|
|
The BIO_vprintf() will allow the provider to print any text, given a
BIO supplied by libcrypto.
Additionally, we add a provider library with functions to collect all
the currently supplied BIO upcalls, as well as wrappers around those
upcalls.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10394)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10487)
|
|
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_keylen() was succeeding even though a bad key length
is passed to it. This is because the set_ctx_params() were all accepting
this parameter and blindly changing the keylen even though the cipher did
not accept a variable key length. Even removing this didn't entirely
resolve the issue because set_ctx_params() functions succeed even if
passed a parameter they do not recognise.
This should fix various issues found by OSSfuzz/Cryptofuzz.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10449)
|
|
Fixes #10438
issue found by clusterfuzz/ossfuzz
The dest was getting a copy of the src structure which contained a pointer that should point to an offset inside itself - because of the copy it was pointing to the original structure.
The setup for a ctx is mainly done by the initkey method in the PROV_CIPHER_HW structure. Because of this it makes sense that the structure should also contain a copyctx method that is use to resolve any pointers that need to be setup.
A dup_ctx has been added to the cipher_enc tests in evp_test. It does a dup after setup and then frees the original ctx. This detects any floating pointers in the duplicated context that were pointing back to the freed ctx.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10443)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10152)
|
|
Previous macros suggested that from 3.0, we're only allowed to
deprecate things at a major version. However, there's no policy
stating this, but there is for removal, saying that to remove
something, it must have been deprecated for 5 years, and that removal
can only happen at a major version.
Meanwhile, the semantic versioning rule is that deprecation should
trigger a MINOR version update, which is reflected in the macro names
as of this change.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10364)
|
|
Signed-off-by: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9949)
|
|
Implement SP800-108 section 5.2 with CMAC support. As a side effect,
enable 5.1 with CMAC and 5.2 with HMAC. Add test vectors from RFC 6803.
Add OSSL_KDF_PARAM_CIPHER and PROV_R_INVALID_SEED_LENGTH.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10143)
|
|
Not needed any more, since the presence of the OSSL_FUNC_CIPHER_CIPHER
function is enough to tell that there's a custom cipher function.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10137)
|
|
The end up in providers/common/include/prov/.
All inclusions are adjusted accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
|
|
New name is providers/implementations/include/prov/implementations.h
All inclusions are adapted accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
|
|
From providers/{common,default}/ to providers/implementations/
Except for common code, which remains in providers/common/ciphers/.
However, we do move providers/common/include/internal/ciphers/*.h
to providers/common/include/prov/, and adjust all source including
any of those header files.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
|
|
From providers/{common,default,legacy}/ to providers/implementations/
However, providers/common/digests/digest_common.c stays where it is,
because it's support code rather than an implementation.
To better support all kinds of implementations with common code, we
add the library providers/libcommon.a. Code that ends up in this
library must be FIPS agnostic.
While we're moving things around, though, we move digestscommon.h
from providers/common/include/internal to providers/common/include/prov,
thereby starting on a provider specific include structure, which
follows the line of thoughts of the recent header file reorganization.
We modify the affected '#include "internal/something.h"' to
'#include "prov/something.h"'.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9991)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10026)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10006)
|
|
Since that flag has lost its relevance, don't use it any more.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10008)
|
|
Make the include guards consistent by renaming them systematically according
to the naming conventions below
For the public header files (in the 'include/openssl' directory), the guard
names try to match the path specified in the include directives, with
all letters converted to upper case and '/' and '.' replaced by '_'. For the
private header files files, an extra 'OSSL_' is added as prefix.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)
|
|
Currently, there are two different directories which contain internal
header files of libcrypto which are meant to be shared internally:
While header files in 'include/internal' are intended to be shared
between libcrypto and libssl, the files in 'crypto/include/internal'
are intended to be shared inside libcrypto only.
To make things complicated, the include search path is set up in such
a way that the directive #include "internal/file.h" could refer to
a file in either of these two directoroes. This makes it necessary
in some cases to add a '_int.h' suffix to some files to resolve this
ambiguity:
#include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal'
#include "internal/file_int.h" # located in 'crypto/include/internal'
This commit moves the private crypto headers from
'crypto/include/internal' to 'include/crypto'
As a result, the include directives become unambiguous
#include "internal/file.h" # located in 'include/internal'
#include "crypto/file.h" # located in 'include/crypto'
hence the superfluous '_int.h' suffixes can be stripped.
The files 'store_int.h' and 'store.h' need to be treated specially;
they are joined into a single file.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9333)
|
|
Implement SP800-108 section 5.1 with HMAC intended for use in Kerberos.
Add test vectors from RFC 8009.
Adds error codes PROV_R_INVALID_MAC and PROV_R_MISSING_MAC.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9924)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9992)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9954)
|
|
It was short lived, as it's not necessary any more.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9946)
|
|
ossl_prov_macctx_load_from_params() creates a EVP_MAC_CTX *, or sets
new common parameters for an existing one.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9946)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9406)
|
|
With some provider implementations, there are underlying ciphers,
digests and macs. For some of them, the name was retrieved from the
method, but since the methods do not store those any more, we add
different mechanics.
For code that needs to pass on the name of a cipher or diges via
parameters, we simply locally store the name that was used when
fetching said cipher or digest. This will ensure that any underlying
code that needs to fetch that same cipher or digest does so with the
exact same name instead of any random name from the set of names
associated with the algorithm.
For code that needs to check what kind of algorithm was passed, we
provide EVP_{type}_is_a(), that returns true if the given method has
the given name as one of its names.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9897)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9320)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9935)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9932)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9929)
|
