Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Thanks folks:
348 Benjamin Kaduk
317 Christian Brueffer
254 Erik Tews
253 Erik Tews
219 Carl Mehner
155 (ghost)
95 mancha
51 DominikNeubauer
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
* adds links to various related documents.
* fixes a few typos.
* rewords a few sentences.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
|
|
amounts of spaces.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
The current documentation contains a bunch of spelling and grammar mistakes. I also
found it hard to understand some paragraphs, so here is my attempt to improve its
readability.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
|
|
|
PR: 1044 + 1045
|
|
a security threat on unexpecting applications. Document and test.
|
|
|
|
the CA certificate part of the CA database, and combined with
'unique_subject=no', it should make operations like CA certificate
roll-over easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR: 422
|
|
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting
with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making
sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with
opensslconf.h.
I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from
external software that will adapt if they have used something like
NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this
change would be a good thing.
|
|
a draft.
|