| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
If two threads both attempt to load the same provider at the same time,
they will first both check to see if the provider already exists. If it
doesn't then they will both then create new provider objects and call the
init function. However only one of the threads will be successful in adding
the provider to the store. For the "losing" thread we should still return
"success", but we should deinitialise and free the no longer required
provider object, and return the object that exists in the store.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
|
|
These 2 functions have become so close to each other that they may as well
be just one function.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
|
|
Update use_fallbacks to zero when we add a provider to the store rather
than when we activate it. Its only at the point that we add it to the store
that it is actually usable and visible to other threads.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
|
|
Now that a provider is no longer put into the store until after it has
been activated we don't need flag_couldbechild any more. This flag was
used to indicate whether a provider was eligible for conversion into a
child provider or not. This was only really interesting for predefined
providers that were automatically created.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
|
|
Rather than creating the provider, adding to the store and then activating
it, we do things the other way around, i.e. activate first and then add to
the store. This means that the activation should occur before other threads
are aware of the provider.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
|
|
If the global properties are updated after a provider with a child libctx
has already started we need to make sure those updates are mirrored in
that child.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15242)
|
|
Where a child libctx is in use it needs to know what the current global
properties are.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15242)
|
|
If the child provider context data gets cleaned up before all usage of
providers has finished then a use-after-free can occur. We change the
priority of this data so that it gets freed later.
Fixes #15284
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15286)
|
|
We were deferring the initial creation of the child providers until the
first fetch. This is a carry over from an earlier iteration of the child
lib ctx development and is no longer necessary. In fact we need to init
the child providers immediately otherwise not all providers quite init
correctly.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15270)
|
|
If a provider explicitly loads another provider into a child libctx where
it wasn't previously loaded then we don't start treating it like a child
if the parent libctx subsequently loads the same provider.
Fixes #14925
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
|
|
If the ref counts on a child provider change, then this needs to be
reflected in the parent so we add callbacks to do this.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
|
|
By adding callbacks to the core this will enable (in future commits) the
ability to add/remove child providers as the providers are added/removed
from the parent libctx.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
|
|
Add a child OSSL_LIB_CTX that will mirror the providers loaded into the
parent libctx. This is useful for providers that want to use algorithms
from other providers and just need to inherit the providers used by the
application.
Fixes #14925
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
|
