| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Provide a function to applications to query the capabilities that a
provider can perform.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11914)
|
|
Implement a function which enables us to get hold of the provider ctx
for a loaded provider.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11834)
|
|
This is useful to get hold of the low-level dispatch tables. This could
be used to create a new provider based on an existing one.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11834)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12043)
|
|
This allows applications to iterate over all loaded providers.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11858)
|
|
It was argued that names like SOMETHING_set_param_types were confusing,
and a rename has been proposed to SOMETHING_settable_params, and by
consequence, SOMETHING_get_param_types is renamed
SOMETHING_gettable_params.
This changes implements this change for the dispatched provider and
core functions.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9591)
|
|
Previously we only loaded the config file by default for libssl. Now we do
it for libcrypto too.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9492)
|
|
Public function OSSL_PROVIDER_available() takes a library context and
a provider name, and returns 1 if it's available for use, i.e. if it's
possible to fetch implementations from it, otherwise 0.
Internal function ossl_provider_activated() returns 1 if the given
OSSL_PROVIDER is activated, otherwise 0.
To make this possible, the activation of fallbacks got refactored out
to a separate function, which ended up simplifying the code.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9398)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9346)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9356)
|
|
Instead of referencing the return size from the OSSL_PARAM structure, make the
size a field within the structure.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9135)
|
|
Some OSSL_PROVIDER getters took a non-const OSSL_PROVIDER parameter.
There's no reason to do so.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9054)
|
|
Adding a provider means creating an internal provier object and adding
it to the store. This allows the addition of built in providers, be it
in the OpenSSL libraries or in any application.
"Loading" a provider is defined broadly. A built in provider is already
"loaded" in essence and only needs activating, while a provider in a
dynamically loadable module requires actually loading the module itself.
In this API, "loading" a provider does both.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8287)
|
