Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2012-03-22 | set version to 1.0.2-dev | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-03-14 | prepare for 1.0.1 release | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-02-23 | correct CHANGESOpenSSL_1_0_1-beta3 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-01-19 | change version to beta3-dev | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-01-19 | prepare for beta2 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-01-03 | prepare for 1.0.1-beta1OpenSSL_1_0_1-beta1 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2012-01-02 | OpenSSL 1.0.1 is now in beta. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2011-01-03 | PR: 2416 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
Submitted by: Mark Phalan <mark.phalan@oracle.com> Reviewed by: steve Use L suffix in version number. | |||
2010-06-16 | update versions for 1.0.1 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-06-16 | update README, fix opensslv.h | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-06-16 | update for next version | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-06-01 | prepare for releaseOpenSSL_1_0_0a | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-03-30 | updates for next release | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-03-29 | Prepare for 1.0.0 release - finally ;-)OpenSSL_1_0_0 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-01-20 | update version for next beta if we have one... | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2010-01-20 | Prepare for beta5 release | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-11-10 | Prepare for beta4 release | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-07-15 | Update for next beta. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-07-15 | Preparation for beta3 release.OpenSSL_1_0_0-beta3 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-04-21 | Change version to beta3-dev | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-04-21 | Beta 2 preparation. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-04-03 | Update version info, fix typo. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-04-01 | Update for first beta. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-03-31 | Fix shlib version. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-03-31 | Correct version. | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2009-03-31 | HEAD is now 1.1.0 | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
The 1.0.0 branch is now OpenSSL_1_0_0-stable | |||
2009-03-28 | Nothing to see here... move along.... | Dr. Stephen Henson | |
2007-02-17 | Reorganize the data used for SSL ciphersuite pattern matching. | Bodo Möller | |
This change resolves a number of problems and obviates multiple kludges. A new feature is that you can now say "AES256" or "AES128" (not just "AES", which enables both). In some cases the ciphersuite list generated from a given string is affected by this change. I hope this is just in those cases where the previous behaviour did not make sense. | |||
2005-05-18 | I just branched 0.9.8, so HEAD needs to be bumped to 0.9.9-dev. | Richard Levitte | |
The 0.9.8 branch is called OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable. | |||
2004-05-17 | Make reservations for FIPS code in HEAD branch, so that the moment FIPS | Andy Polyakov | |
comes in we have required macros in place. | |||
2002-07-31 | The version of the shared library should, for now, reflect the version | Richard Levitte | |
of OpenSSL. Part of PR 181. | |||
2002-04-11 | Change the date to XX xxx XXXX in development versions. | Richard Levitte | |
2002-02-13 | Modify the main trunk version to 0.9.8-dev. | Richard Levitte | |
0.9.7 now lives in the branch OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable. | |||
2001-08-10 | Apply the Tru64 patch from Tim Mooney <mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu> | Richard Levitte | |
His comments are: 1) Changes all references for `True64' to be `Tru64', which is the correct spelling for the OS name. 2) Makes `alpha-cc' be the same as `alpha164-cc', and adds an `alphaold-cc' entry that is the same as the previous `alpha-cc'. The reason is that most people these days are using the newer compiler, so it should be the default. 3) Adds a bit of commentary to Configure, regarding the name changes of the OS over the years, so it's not so confusing to people that haven't been with the OS for a while. 4) Adds an `alpha-cc-rpath' target (which is *not* selected automatically by Configure under any circumstance) that builds an RPATH into the shared libraries. This is explained in the comment in Configure. It's very very useful for people that want it, and people that don't want it just shouldn't choose that target. 5) Adds the `-pthread' flag as the best way to get POSIX thread support from the newer compiler. 6) Updates the Makefile targets, so that when the `alpha164-cc', `alpha-cc', or `alpha-cc-rpath' target is what Configure is set to use, it uses a Makefile target that includes the `-msym' option when building the shared library. This is a performance enhancement. 7) Updates `config' so that if it detects you're running version 4 or 5 of the OS, it automatically selects `alpha-cc', but uses `alphaold-cc' for versions 1-3 of the OS. 8) Updates the comment in opensslv.h, fixing both the OS name typo and adding a reference to IRIX 6.x, since the shared library semantics are virtually identical there. | |||
2001-07-10 | In version numbers, there is just one "M" nybble. | Bodo Möller | |
2000-10-13 | Bump the shared library version (should have been done a while ago). | Richard Levitte | |
2000-09-24 | Update the status and version number to 0.9.7-dev. | Richard Levitte | |
2000-09-24 | Time to build the release. Bump the version info accordingly. | Richard Levitte | |
2000-09-21 | Time to build beta 3. Bump the version numbers accordingly.OpenSSL_0_9_6-beta3 | Richard Levitte | |
2000-09-17 | A new beta is being released. Change the version numbers | Richard Levitte | |
accordingly. | |||
2000-09-11 | Time to release a beta. Change the version numbers and dates | Richard Levitte | |
accordingly. | |||
2000-07-21 | Redo and enhance the support for building shared libraries. Currently | Richard Levitte | |
there's support for building under Linux and True64 (using examples from the programming manuals), including versioning that is currently the same as OpenSSL versions but should really be a different series. With this change, it's up to the users to decide if they want shared libraries as well as the static ones. This decision now has to be done at configuration time (well, not really, those who know what they do can still do it the same way as before). The OpenSSL programs (openssl and the test programs) are currently always linked statically, but this may change in the future in a configurable manner. The necessary makefile variables to enable this are in place. Also note that I have done absolutely nothing about the Windows target to get something similar. On the other hand, DLLs are already the default there, but without versioning, and I've no idea what the possibilities for such a thing are there... | |||
2000-04-01 | Tagging has now been done, update to the next possible version (I keep | Richard Levitte | |
a low profile, so we don't get discontinuity in the numbering...) | |||
2000-04-01 | Building version 0.9.5a | Richard Levitte | |
2000-03-23 | Tagging has been done, update to next probable version... | Richard Levitte | |
2000-03-23 | Time for version 0.9.5a beta2 | Richard Levitte | |
I know it's earlier than announced. The high amount of problems in beta1 warants this, however. | |||
2000-03-20 | Tagging done, we move to the next possible. | Richard Levitte | |
2000-03-20 | Change the version text, it's time to release the first beta of 0.9.5a. | Richard Levitte | |
2000-03-19 | Change the notation and coding of the version to be able to contain | Richard Levitte | |
both a patch level and a beta status. IMHO, it also makes more sense to have beta status be part of the development status than to have it be an alternate name for patch levels under special conditions. | |||
2000-02-28 | Tagging has been done, time to switch to 0.9.6-dev. | Richard Levitte | |