Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Fixes #12091
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14563)
|
|
The memleak test otherwise fails.
Also disable async, dtls, and old tls versions to test some
different combination of disableables and speed up tests.
Fixes #14337
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14536)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14416)
|
|
The boringssl (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/14424)
and pyca-cryptography (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/14425)
tests are currently broken.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14416)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14416)
|
|
Update gost-engine submodule.
Update pyca-cryptography submodule.
Fix condition for skipping krb5 test.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14416)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14126)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13987)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13935)
|
|
There are some options that seem to belong to the legacy build.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13903)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13706)
|
|
'check-update' runs a 'make update' to check that it wasn't forgotten.
'check-docs' runs 'make doc-nits'. We have that as a separate job to
make it more prominent.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13701)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13686)
|
|
no-asm has proven to be too slow, therefore we don't use it in the Github
CI builds and instead rely on it being covered by run-checker.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13607)
|
|
no-ec no-ktls no-siv
This works nicely by addin a new no-bulk option to Configure.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13110)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13580)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13580)
|
|
As an interim measure until we work out our longer term CI strategy
this PR enables some basic CI tests using the Github CI capability.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13489)
|
|
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/.github/SUPPORT.md ->
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/SUPPORT.md
Fixes #13396
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13397)
|
|
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12320)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
GH: #12035
|
|
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11339)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11140)
|
|
The file was converted to Markdown and renamed appropriately in
2e07506a12e126894cd820304465162bc0e732b4.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11223)
|
|
In the first step, we just add the .md extension and move some
files around, without changing any content. These changes will
occur in the following commits.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10545)
|
|
This template automatically adds the [issue: documentation] label.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10051)
|
|
Actually, we would rather see general questions posted to the
openssl-users mailing list. But habits have changed and more and
more users ask questions on GitHub. Many of them are currently tagged
as bug reports or feature requests, because there is no appropriate
template for questions. This commit adds the missing template.
This template automatically adds the [issue: question] label.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10051)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10266)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
GH: #9319
|
|
HTML comments aren't rendered, so markdown link syntax is irrelevant
inside them, and more confusing than useful.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7632)
|
|
This will hopefully help directing our users to better user support
resources as well as give some relevant advice in issue templates.
https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7623)
|
|
It's of course also possible to just add them to the PR description,
but having these lines in the commit messages provide better
automation.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3104)
|
|
When creating a single commit PR, github will now automatically
include the commit comment first in the pull request description, and
add the template content last. That makes the description section at
the end useless.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3104)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2317)
|
|
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
GH: #1770
|