summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto/camellia
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/camellia')
-rw-r--r--crypto/camellia/asm/cmllt4-sparcv9.pl4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/camellia/asm/cmllt4-sparcv9.pl b/crypto/camellia/asm/cmllt4-sparcv9.pl
index 50bddfed29..6396679a5a 100644
--- a/crypto/camellia/asm/cmllt4-sparcv9.pl
+++ b/crypto/camellia/asm/cmllt4-sparcv9.pl
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
# Camellia for SPARC T4.
#
# As with AES below results [for aligned data] are virtually identical
-# to critical path lenths for 3-cycle instruction latency:
+# to critical path lengths for 3-cycle instruction latency:
#
# 128-bit key 192/256-
# CBC encrypt 4.14/4.21(*) 5.46/5.52
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
# misaligned data.
#
# As with Intel AES-NI, question is if it's possible to improve
-# performance of parallelizeable modes by interleaving round
+# performance of parallelizable modes by interleaving round
# instructions. In Camellia every instruction is dependent on
# previous, which means that there is place for 2 additional ones
# in between two dependent. Can we expect 3x performance improvement?