diff options
author | Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> | 2016-10-27 10:46:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> | 2016-11-07 16:05:11 +0000 |
commit | 929cc3fa6bceba1c6d9c362c56b89cbf2acf40bc (patch) | |
tree | 9b76d44e6a61be0361aabd91bc7ab2f9bc127eea /ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c | |
parent | 992b3740a1f7b24771ccf29a52b0141c51b95933 (diff) |
Partial revert of "Fix client verify mode to check SSL_VERIFY_PEER"
This partially reverts commit c636c1c47. It also tweaks the documentation
and comments in this area. On the client side the documented interface for
SSL_CTX_set_verify()/SSL_set_verify() is that setting the flag
SSL_VERIFY_PEER causes verfication of the server certificate to take place.
Previously what was implemented was that if *any* flag was set then
verification would take place. The above commit improved the semantics to
be as per the documented interface.
However, we have had a report of at least one application where an
application was incorrectly using the interface and used *only*
SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT on the client side. In OpenSSL prior to
the above commit this still caused verification of the server certificate
to take place. After this commit the application silently failed to verify
the server certificate.
Ideally SSL_CTX_set_verify()/SSL_set_verify() could be modified to indicate
if invalid flags were being used. However these are void functions!
The simplest short term solution is to revert to the previous behaviour
which at least means we "fail closed" rather than "fail open".
Thanks to Cory Benfield for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8e2f98c97ff3327784843946c2d62761572e5d5)
Diffstat (limited to 'ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c')
-rw-r--r-- | ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c b/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c index 692544b32c..e90a63cc87 100644 --- a/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c +++ b/ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c @@ -1224,7 +1224,21 @@ MSG_PROCESS_RETURN tls_process_server_certificate(SSL *s, PACKET *pkt) } i = ssl_verify_cert_chain(s, sk); - if ((s->verify_mode & SSL_VERIFY_PEER) && i <= 0) { + /* + * The documented interface is that SSL_VERIFY_PEER should be set in order + * for client side verification of the server certificate to take place. + * However, historically the code has only checked that *any* flag is set + * to cause server verification to take place. Use of the other flags makes + * no sense in client mode. An attempt to clean up the semantics was + * reverted because at least one application *only* set + * SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT. Prior to the clean up this still caused + * server verification to take place, after the clean up it silently did + * nothing. SSL_CTX_set_verify()/SSL_set_verify() cannot validate the flags + * sent to them because they are void functions. Therefore, we now use the + * (less clean) historic behaviour of performing validation if any flag is + * set. The *documented* interface remains the same. + */ + if (s->verify_mode != SSL_VERIFY_NONE && i <= 0) { al = ssl_verify_alarm_type(s->verify_result); SSLerr(SSL_F_TLS_PROCESS_SERVER_CERTIFICATE, SSL_R_CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED); |