diff options
| author | Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org> | 2009-02-14 21:49:38 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org> | 2009-02-14 21:49:38 +0000 |
| commit | 477fd4596feb89fe943130c8b1a4e37a0d3764bb (patch) | |
| tree | 06e988b58c9127180ea9ce61841064bcfa736f9f /doc/ssleay.txt | |
| parent | 30b1b28aff8911c6a39890e78f8358079a415353 (diff) | |
PR: 1835
Submitted by: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
Approved by: steve@openssl.org
Fix various typos.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/ssleay.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/ssleay.txt | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ssleay.txt b/doc/ssleay.txt index c75312911f..a8b04d7059 100644 --- a/doc/ssleay.txt +++ b/doc/ssleay.txt @@ -3800,9 +3800,9 @@ made public on sci.crypt in Sep 1994 (RC4) and Feb 1996 (RC2). I have copies of the origional postings if people are interested. RSA I believe claim that they were 'trade-secrets' and that some-one broke an NDA in revealing them. Other claim they reverse engineered the algorithms from -compiled binaries. If the algorithms were reverse engineered, I belive +compiled binaries. If the algorithms were reverse engineered, I believe RSA had no legal leg to stand on. If an NDA was broken, I don't know. -Regardless, RSA, I belive, is willing to go to court over the issue so +Regardless, RSA, I believe, is willing to go to court over the issue so licencing is probably the best idea, or at least talk to them. If there are people who actually know more about this, pease let me know, I don't want to vilify or spread miss-information if I can help it. |