diff options
| author | Dimitri Papadopoulos <3234522+DimitriPapadopoulos@users.noreply.github.com> | 2023-07-16 08:25:55 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pauli <pauli@openssl.org> | 2023-07-18 18:54:45 +1000 |
| commit | a024ab984e540bff65d25407496c34b3567b55a7 (patch) | |
| tree | 926b3165cd52ea6abe176682d13fadb59cc0f224 /doc/designs | |
| parent | 4c4fefa5c78a49b63113aec35a2bc8d6d9432436 (diff) | |
Fix typos found by codespell
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21467)
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/designs')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/designs/ddd/WINDOWS.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/designs/ddd/WINDOWS.md b/doc/designs/ddd/WINDOWS.md index d92c4133d3..033b2808d9 100644 --- a/doc/designs/ddd/WINDOWS.md +++ b/doc/designs/ddd/WINDOWS.md @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Evaluation of the existing demos and their applicability to Windows IOCP: Further, a cursory examination of code on GitHub seems to suggest that when people do use IOCP with libssl, they do it using memory BIOs passed to libssl. -So ddd-05 and ddd-06 essentially demonstate this use case, especially ddd-06 as +So ddd-05 and ddd-06 essentially demonstrate this use case, especially ddd-06 as it uses IOCP internally on Windows. My conclusion here is that since libssl does not support IOCP in the first |