summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>2010-03-22 17:24:18 +0000
committerAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>2010-03-22 17:24:18 +0000
commitc3473126b1ed43e281f5fb2394f16bf8a5be2922 (patch)
treed59a6c1a8b2dbeb59ca185683279e066669124e5 /crypto
parent82f385d71d1e060422897e8155c0d741bd459c01 (diff)
GHASH assembler: new ghash-sparcv9.pl module and saner descriptions.
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto')
-rwxr-xr-xcrypto/modes/asm/ghash-ia64.pl20
-rw-r--r--crypto/modes/asm/ghash-sparcv9.pl324
-rw-r--r--crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86.pl14
-rw-r--r--crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl10
4 files changed, 346 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-ia64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-ia64.pl
index 86c08c6477..3fd1446cd9 100755
--- a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-ia64.pl
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-ia64.pl
@@ -9,16 +9,16 @@
#
# March 2010
#
-# The module implements "4-bit" Galois field multiplication and
-# streamed GHASH function. "4-bit" means that it uses 256 bytes
-# per-key table [+128 bytes shared table]. Streamed GHASH performance
-# was measured to be 6.35 cycles per processed byte on Itanium 2,
-# which is >90% better than Microsoft compiler generated code. Well,
-# the number should have been ~6.5. The deviation has everything to do
-# with the way performance is measured, as difference between GCM and
-# straightforward 128-bit counter mode. To anchor to something else
-# sha1-ia64.pl module processes one byte in 6.0 cycles. On Itanium
-# GHASH should run at ~8.5 cycles per byte.
+# The module implements "4-bit" GCM GHASH function and underlying
+# single multiplication operation in GF(2^128). "4-bit" means that it
+# uses 256 bytes per-key table [+128 bytes shared table]. Streamed
+# GHASH performance was measured to be 6.35 cycles per processed byte
+# on Itanium 2, which is >90% better than Microsoft compiler generated
+# code. Well, the number should have been ~6.5. The deviation has
+# everything to do with the way performance is measured: as difference
+# between GCM and straightforward 128-bit counter mode. To anchor to
+# something else sha1-ia64.pl module processes one byte in 6.0 cycles.
+# On Itanium GHASH should run at ~8.5 cycles per byte.
$output=shift and (open STDOUT,">$output" or die "can't open $output: $!");
diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-sparcv9.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-sparcv9.pl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..47d7a1dca3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-sparcv9.pl
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env perl
+
+# ====================================================================
+# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> for the OpenSSL
+# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and
+# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further
+# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/.
+# ====================================================================
+
+# March 2010
+#
+# The module implements "4-bit" GCM GHASH function and underlying
+# single multiplication operation in GF(2^128). "4-bit" means that it
+# uses 256 bytes per-key table [+128 bytes shared table]. Performance
+# results are for streamed GHASH subroutine on UltraSPARC pre-Tx CPU
+# and are expressed in cycles per processed byte, less is better:
+#
+# gcc 3.3.x cc 5.2 this assembler
+#
+# 32-bit build 81.0 48.6 11.8 (+586%/+311%)
+# 64-bit build 27.5 20.3 11.8 (+133%/+72%)
+#
+# I don't quite understand why difference between 32-bit and 64-bit
+# compiler-generated code is so big. Compilers *were* instructed to
+# generate code for UltraSPARC and should have used 64-bit registers
+# for Z vector (see C code) even in 32-bit build... Oh well, it only
+# means more impressive improvement coefficients for this assembler
+# module;-) Loops are aggressively modulo-scheduled in respect to
+# references to input data and Z.hi updates to achieve 12 cycles
+# timing. To anchor to something else, sha1-sparcv9.pl spends 11.6
+# cycles to process one byte [on UltraSPARC pre-Tx CPU].
+
+$bits=32;
+for (@ARGV) { $bits=64 if (/\-m64/ || /\-xarch\=v9/); }
+if ($bits==64) { $bias=2047; $frame=192; }
+else { $bias=0; $frame=112; }
+
+$output=shift;
+open STDOUT,">$output";
+
+$Zhi="%o0"; # 64-bit values
+$Zlo="%o1";
+$Thi="%o2";
+$Tlo="%o3";
+$rem="%o4";
+$tmp="%o5";
+
+$nhi="%l0"; # small values and pointers
+$nlo="%l1";
+$xi0="%l2";
+$xi1="%l3";
+$rem_4bit="%l4";
+$remi="%l5";
+$Htblo="%l6";
+$cnt="%l7";
+
+$inp="%i0"; # input arguments for gcm_ghash_4bit
+$len="%i1";
+$Xi="%i2";
+$Htbl="%i3";
+
+$code.=<<___;
+.section ".text",#alloc,#execinstr
+
+.align 64
+rem_4bit:
+ .long `0x0000<<16`,0,`0x1C20<<16`,0,`0x3840<<16`,0,`0x2460<<16`,0
+ .long `0x7080<<16`,0,`0x6CA0<<16`,0,`0x48C0<<16`,0,`0x54E0<<16`,0
+ .long `0xE100<<16`,0,`0xFD20<<16`,0,`0xD940<<16`,0,`0xC560<<16`,0
+ .long `0x9180<<16`,0,`0x8DA0<<16`,0,`0xA9C0<<16`,0,`0xB5E0<<16`,0
+.type rem_4bit,#object
+.size rem_4bit,(.-rem_4bit)
+
+.globl gcm_ghash_4bit
+.align 32
+gcm_ghash_4bit:
+ save %sp,-$frame,%sp
+ ldub [$inp+15],$nlo
+ ldub [$Xi+15],$xi0
+ ldub [$Xi+14],$xi1
+ add $len,$inp,$len
+ add $Htbl,8,$Htblo
+
+1: call .+8
+ add %o7,rem_4bit-1b,$rem_4bit
+
+.Louter:
+ xor $xi0,$nlo,$nlo
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Zlo
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Zhi
+
+ ldub [$inp+14],$nlo
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ mov 13,$cnt
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+
+ xor $xi1,$nlo,$nlo
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ ba .Lghash_inner
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+.align 32
+.Lghash_inner:
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ ldub [$inp+$cnt],$nlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ ldub [$Xi+$cnt],$xi1
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $xi1,$nlo,$nlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ addcc $cnt,-1,$cnt
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+ blu .Lghash_inner
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+
+ add $inp,16,$inp
+ cmp $inp,$len
+ be,pn `$bits==64?"%xcc":"%icc"`,.Ldone
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ ldub [$inp+15],$nlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zlo,[$Xi+8]
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zhi,[$Xi]
+ srl $Zlo,8,$xi1
+ and $Zlo,0xff,$xi0
+ ba .Louter
+ and $xi1,0xff,$xi1
+.align 32
+.Ldone:
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zlo,[$Xi+8]
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zhi,[$Xi]
+
+ ret
+ restore
+.type gcm_ghash_4bit,#function
+.size gcm_ghash_4bit,(.-gcm_ghash_4bit)
+___
+
+$Xi="%i0"; # input arguments for gcm_gmult_4bit
+$Htbl="%i1";
+undef $inp;
+undef $len;
+
+$code.=<<___;
+.globl gcm_gmult_4bit
+.align 32
+gcm_gmult_4bit:
+ save %sp,-$frame,%sp
+ ldub [$Xi+15],$nlo
+ add $Htbl,8,$Htblo
+
+1: call .+8
+ add %o7,rem_4bit-1b,$rem_4bit
+
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Zlo
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Zhi
+
+ ldub [$Xi+14],$nlo
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ mov 13,$cnt
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ ba .Lgmult_inner
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+.align 32
+.Lgmult_inner:
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ ldub [$Xi+$cnt],$nlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ and $nlo,0xf0,$nhi
+ addcc $cnt,-1,$cnt
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ and $nlo,0x0f,$nlo
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ sll $nlo,4,$nlo
+ blu .Lgmult_inner
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nlo],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nlo],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ and $Zlo,0xf,$remi
+
+ ldx [$Htblo+$nhi],$Tlo
+ sll $remi,3,$remi
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ ldx [$Htbl+$nhi],$Thi
+ srlx $Zlo,4,$Zlo
+ ldx [$rem_4bit+$remi],$rem
+ sllx $Zhi,60,$tmp
+ xor $Tlo,$Zlo,$Zlo
+ srlx $Zhi,4,$Zhi
+ xor $Zlo,$tmp,$Zlo
+ xor $Thi,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zlo,[$Xi+8]
+ xor $rem,$Zhi,$Zhi
+ stx $Zhi,[$Xi]
+
+ ret
+ restore
+.type gcm_gmult_4bit,#function
+.size gcm_gmult_4bit,(.-gcm_gmult_4bit)
+.asciz "GHASH for SPARCv9, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
+___
+
+$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;
+print $code;
+close STDOUT;
diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86.pl
index 63e76c1da6..13efbcef6a 100644
--- a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86.pl
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86.pl
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
#
# March 2010
#
-# The module implements "4-bit" Galois field multiplication and
-# streamed GHASH function. "4-bit" means that it uses 256 bytes
-# per-key table [+64/128 bytes fixed table]. It has two code paths:
-# vanilla x86 and vanilla MMX. Former will be executed on 486 and
-# Pentium, latter on all others. Performance results are for streamed
-# GHASH subroutine and are expressed in cycles per processed byte,
-# less is better:
+# The module implements "4-bit" GCM GHASH function and underlying
+# single multiplication operation in GF(2^128). "4-bit" means that it
+# uses 256 bytes per-key table [+64/128 bytes fixed table]. It has two
+# code paths: vanilla x86 and vanilla MMX. Former will be executed on
+# 486 and Pentium, latter on all others. Performance results are for
+# streamed GHASH subroutine and are expressed in cycles per processed
+# byte, less is better:
#
# gcc 2.95.3(*) MMX assembler x86 assembler
#
diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
index e20767836f..1072979829 100644
--- a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
#
# March 2010
#
-# The module implements "4-bit" Galois field multiplication and
-# streamed GHASH function. "4-bit" means that it uses 256 bytes
-# per-key table [+128 bytes shared table]. Performance results are for
-# streamed GHASH subroutine and are expressed in cycles per processed
-# byte, less is better:
+# The module implements "4-bit" GCM GHASH function and underlying
+# single multiplication operation in GF(2^128). "4-bit" means that it
+# uses 256 bytes per-key table [+128 bytes shared table]. Performance
+# results are for streamed GHASH subroutine and are expressed in
+# cycles per processed byte, less is better:
#
# gcc 3.4.x assembler
#