diff options
| author | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2005-11-30 20:52:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2005-11-30 20:52:27 +0000 |
| commit | a3344c8e5edbf8560143ac456d55efd109938000 (patch) | |
| tree | fa094546533724bfa4ed363e7a8a437996cb870a /crypto/whrlpool | |
| parent | c173d09c566e3a3a93edf080e983c08ea9cf6407 (diff) | |
Fix typos in wp-mmx.pl.
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/whrlpool')
| -rw-r--r-- | crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl b/crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl index 60bae63554..ee7734b2a3 100644 --- a/crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl +++ b/crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ # # (*) I've sketched even non-MMX assembler, but for the record # I've failed to beat the Intel compiler on P4, without using -* MMX that is... +# MMX that is... # (**) ... on AMD on the other hand non-MMX assembler was observed # to perform significantly better, but I figured this MMX # implementation is even faster anyway, so why bother? As for @@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ $tbl="ebp"; for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"esi")); } # L=H &set_label("outerloop"); - for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP($i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # K=H + for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP($i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # K=L for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &pxor(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"edi")); } # L^=inp - for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP(64+$i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } #S=L + for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP(64+$i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # S=L &xor ("esi","esi"); &mov (&DWP(12,"ebx"),"esi"); # zero round counter |