diff options
author | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2011-06-28 13:53:50 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> | 2011-06-28 13:53:50 +0000 |
commit | 84968e25f31c76b0e9043002b43bdcc6cad96fc2 (patch) | |
tree | 5e681c3fc83e77f7e2a5fcec90e49e2098b39560 /crypto/rc4 | |
parent | 10fd0b7b55b2d1ec80c17a97bcb96ab353ced152 (diff) |
x86[_64] assembler pack: back-port SHA1 and RC4 from HEAD.
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/rc4')
-rw-r--r-- | crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-586.pl | 166 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl | 282 |
2 files changed, 380 insertions, 68 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-586.pl b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-586.pl index ec82c35b88..84f1a798cb 100644 --- a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-586.pl +++ b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-586.pl @@ -24,10 +24,38 @@ # For reference! This code delivers ~80% of rc4-amd64.pl # performance on the same Opteron machine. # (**) This number requires compressed key schedule set up by -# private_RC4_set_key [see commentary below for further details]. +# RC4_set_key [see commentary below for further details]. # # <appro@fy.chalmers.se> +# May 2011 +# +# Optimize for Core2 and Westmere [and incidentally Opteron]. Current +# performance in cycles per processed byte (less is better) and +# improvement relative to previous version of this module is: +# +# Pentium 10.2 # original numbers +# Pentium III 7.8(*) +# Intel P4 7.5 +# +# Opteron 6.1/+20% # new MMX numbers +# Core2 5.3/+67%(**) +# Westmere 5.1/+94%(**) +# Sandy Bridge 5.0/+8% +# Atom 12.6/+6% +# +# (*) PIII can actually deliver 6.6 cycles per byte with MMX code, +# but this specific code performs poorly on Core2. And vice +# versa, below MMX/SSE code delivering 5.8/7.1 on Core2 performs +# poorly on PIII, at 8.0/14.5:-( As PIII is not a "hot" CPU +# [anymore], I chose to discard PIII-specific code path and opt +# for original IALU-only code, which is why MMX/SSE code path +# is guarded by SSE2 bit (see below), not MMX/SSE. +# (**) Performance vs. block size on Core2 and Westmere had a maximum +# at ... 64 bytes block size. And it was quite a maximum, 40-60% +# in comparison to largest 8KB block size. Above improvement +# coefficients are for the largest block size. + $0 =~ m/(.*[\/\\])[^\/\\]+$/; $dir=$1; push(@INC,"${dir}","${dir}../../perlasm"); require "x86asm.pl"; @@ -62,6 +90,68 @@ sub RC4_loop { &$func ($out,&DWP(0,$dat,$ty,4)); } +if ($alt=0) { + # >20% faster on Atom and Sandy Bridge[!], 8% faster on Opteron, + # but ~40% slower on Core2 and Westmere... Attempt to add movz + # brings down Opteron by 25%, Atom and Sandy Bridge by 15%, yet + # on Core2 with movz it's almost 20% slower than below alternative + # code... Yes, it's a total mess... + my @XX=($xx,$out); + $RC4_loop_mmx = sub { # SSE actually... + my $i=shift; + my $j=$i<=0?0:$i>>1; + my $mm=$i<=0?"mm0":"mm".($i&1); + + &add (&LB($yy),&LB($tx)); + &lea (@XX[1],&DWP(1,@XX[0])); + &pxor ("mm2","mm0") if ($i==0); + &psllq ("mm1",8) if ($i==0); + &and (@XX[1],0xff); + &pxor ("mm0","mm0") if ($i<=0); + &mov ($ty,&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4)); + &mov (&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4),$tx); + &pxor ("mm1","mm2") if ($i==0); + &mov (&DWP(0,$dat,$XX[0],4),$ty); + &add (&LB($ty),&LB($tx)); + &movd (@XX[0],"mm7") if ($i==0); + &mov ($tx,&DWP(0,$dat,@XX[1],4)); + &pxor ("mm1","mm1") if ($i==1); + &movq ("mm2",&QWP(0,$inp)) if ($i==1); + &movq (&QWP(-8,(@XX[0],$inp)),"mm1") if ($i==0); + &pinsrw ($mm,&DWP(0,$dat,$ty,4),$j); + + push (@XX,shift(@XX)) if ($i>=0); + } +} else { + # Using pinsrw here improves performane on Intel CPUs by 2-3%, but + # brings down AMD by 7%... + $RC4_loop_mmx = sub { + my $i=shift; + + &add (&LB($yy),&LB($tx)); + &psllq ("mm1",8*(($i-1)&7)) if (abs($i)!=1); + &mov ($ty,&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4)); + &mov (&DWP(0,$dat,$yy,4),$tx); + &mov (&DWP(0,$dat,$xx,4),$ty); + &inc ($xx); + &add ($ty,$tx); + &movz ($xx,&LB($xx)); # (*) + &movz ($ty,&LB($ty)); # (*) + &pxor ("mm2",$i==1?"mm0":"mm1") if ($i>=0); + &movq ("mm0",&QWP(0,$inp)) if ($i<=0); + &movq (&QWP(-8,($out,$inp)),"mm2") if ($i==0); + &mov ($tx,&DWP(0,$dat,$xx,4)); + &movd ($i>0?"mm1":"mm2",&DWP(0,$dat,$ty,4)); + + # (*) This is the key to Core2 and Westmere performance. + # Whithout movz out-of-order execution logic confuses + # itself and fails to reorder loads and stores. Problem + # appears to be fixed in Sandy Bridge... + } +} + +&external_label("OPENSSL_ia32cap_P"); + # void RC4(RC4_KEY *key,size_t len,const unsigned char *inp,unsigned char *out); &function_begin("RC4"); &mov ($dat,&wparam(0)); # load key schedule pointer @@ -94,11 +184,56 @@ sub RC4_loop { &and ($ty,-4); # how many 4-byte chunks? &jz (&label("loop1")); + &test ($ty,-8); + &mov (&wparam(3),$out); # $out as accumulator in these loops + &jz (&label("go4loop4")); + + &picmeup($out,"OPENSSL_ia32cap_P"); + &bt (&DWP(0,$out),26); # check SSE2 bit [could have been MMX] + &jnc (&label("go4loop4")); + + &mov ($out,&wparam(3)) if (!$alt); + &movd ("mm7",&wparam(3)) if ($alt); + &and ($ty,-8); + &lea ($ty,&DWP(-8,$inp,$ty)); + &mov (&DWP(-4,$dat),$ty); # save input+(len/8)*8-8 + + &$RC4_loop_mmx(-1); + &jmp(&label("loop_mmx_enter")); + + &set_label("loop_mmx",16); + &$RC4_loop_mmx(0); + &set_label("loop_mmx_enter"); + for ($i=1;$i<8;$i++) { &$RC4_loop_mmx($i); } + &mov ($ty,$yy); + &xor ($yy,$yy); # this is second key to Core2 + &mov (&LB($yy),&LB($ty)); # and Westmere performance... + &cmp ($inp,&DWP(-4,$dat)); + &lea ($inp,&DWP(8,$inp)); + &jb (&label("loop_mmx")); + + if ($alt) { + &movd ($out,"mm7"); + &pxor ("mm2","mm0"); + &psllq ("mm1",8); + &pxor ("mm1","mm2"); + &movq (&QWP(-8,$out,$inp),"mm1"); + } else { + &psllq ("mm1",56); + &pxor ("mm2","mm1"); + &movq (&QWP(-8,$out,$inp),"mm2"); + } + &emms (); + + &cmp ($inp,&wparam(1)); # compare to input+len + &je (&label("done")); + &jmp (&label("loop1")); + +&set_label("go4loop4",16); &lea ($ty,&DWP(-4,$inp,$ty)); &mov (&wparam(2),$ty); # save input+(len/4)*4-4 - &mov (&wparam(3),$out); # $out as accumulator in this loop - &set_label("loop4",16); + &set_label("loop4"); for ($i=0;$i<4;$i++) { RC4_loop($i); } &ror ($out,8); &xor ($out,&DWP(0,$inp)); @@ -151,7 +286,7 @@ sub RC4_loop { &set_label("done"); &dec (&LB($xx)); - &mov (&BP(-4,$dat),&LB($yy)); # save key->y + &mov (&DWP(-4,$dat),$yy); # save key->y &mov (&BP(-8,$dat),&LB($xx)); # save key->x &set_label("abort"); &function_end("RC4"); @@ -164,10 +299,8 @@ $idi="ebp"; $ido="ecx"; $idx="edx"; -&external_label("OPENSSL_ia32cap_P"); - -# void private_RC4_set_key(RC4_KEY *key,int len,const unsigned char *data); -&function_begin("private_RC4_set_key"); +# void RC4_set_key(RC4_KEY *key,int len,const unsigned char *data); +&function_begin("RC4_set_key"); &mov ($out,&wparam(0)); # load key &mov ($idi,&wparam(1)); # load len &mov ($inp,&wparam(2)); # load data @@ -245,7 +378,7 @@ $idx="edx"; &xor ("eax","eax"); &mov (&DWP(-8,$out),"eax"); # key->x=0; &mov (&DWP(-4,$out),"eax"); # key->y=0; -&function_end("private_RC4_set_key"); +&function_end("RC4_set_key"); # const char *RC4_options(void); &function_begin_B("RC4_options"); @@ -254,14 +387,21 @@ $idx="edx"; &blindpop("eax"); &lea ("eax",&DWP(&label("opts")."-".&label("pic_point"),"eax")); &picmeup("edx","OPENSSL_ia32cap_P"); - &bt (&DWP(0,"edx"),20); - &jnc (&label("skip")); - &add ("eax",12); - &set_label("skip"); + &mov ("edx",&DWP(0,"edx")); + &bt ("edx",20); + &jc (&label("1xchar")); + &bt ("edx",26); + &jnc (&label("ret")); + &add ("eax",25); + &ret (); +&set_label("1xchar"); + &add ("eax",12); +&set_label("ret"); &ret (); &set_label("opts",64); &asciz ("rc4(4x,int)"); &asciz ("rc4(1x,char)"); +&asciz ("rc4(8x,mmx)"); &asciz ("RC4 for x86, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"); &align (64); &function_end_B("RC4_options"); diff --git a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl index b04eb1a72a..e18e8a0008 100755 --- a/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl +++ b/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ # details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. # ==================================================================== # +# July 2004 +# # 2.22x RC4 tune-up:-) It should be noted though that my hand [as in # "hand-coded assembler"] doesn't stand for the whole improvement # coefficient. It turned out that eliminating RC4_CHAR from config @@ -19,6 +21,8 @@ # to operate on partial registers, it turned out to be the best bet. # At least for AMD... How IA32E would perform remains to be seen... +# November 2004 +# # As was shown by Marc Bevand reordering of couple of load operations # results in even higher performance gain of 3.3x:-) At least on # Opteron... For reference, 1x in this case is RC4_CHAR C-code @@ -26,6 +30,8 @@ # Latter means that if you want to *estimate* what to expect from # *your* Opteron, then multiply 54 by 3.3 and clock frequency in GHz. +# November 2004 +# # Intel P4 EM64T core was found to run the AMD64 code really slow... # The only way to achieve comparable performance on P4 was to keep # RC4_CHAR. Kind of ironic, huh? As it's apparently impossible to @@ -33,10 +39,14 @@ # on either AMD and Intel platforms, I implement both cases. See # rc4_skey.c for further details... +# April 2005 +# # P4 EM64T core appears to be "allergic" to 64-bit inc/dec. Replacing # those with add/sub results in 50% performance improvement of folded # loop... +# May 2005 +# # As was shown by Zou Nanhai loop unrolling can improve Intel EM64T # performance by >30% [unlike P4 32-bit case that is]. But this is # provided that loads are reordered even more aggressively! Both code @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ # is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be # preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance]. +# March 2007 +# # Intel Core2 was observed to perform poorly on both code paths:-( It # apparently suffers from some kind of partial register stall, which # occurs in 64-bit mode only [as virtually identical 32-bit loop was @@ -58,6 +70,37 @@ # fit for Core2 and therefore the code was modified to skip cloop8 on # this CPU. +# May 2010 +# +# Intel Westmere was observed to perform suboptimally. Adding yet +# another movzb to cloop1 improved performance by almost 50%! Core2 +# performance is improved too, but nominally... + +# May 2011 +# +# The only code path that was not modified is P4-specific one. Non-P4 +# Intel code path optimization is heavily based on submission by Maxim +# Perminov, Maxim Locktyukhin and Jim Guilford of Intel. I've used +# some of the ideas even in attempt to optmize the original RC4_INT +# code path... Current performance in cycles per processed byte (less +# is better) and improvement coefficients relative to previous +# version of this module are: +# +# Opteron 5.3/+0%(*) +# P4 6.5 +# Core2 6.2/+15%(**) +# Westmere 4.2/+60% +# Sandy Bridge 4.2/+120% +# Atom 9.3/+80% +# +# (*) But corresponding loop has less instructions, which should have +# positive effect on upcoming Bulldozer, which has one less ALU. +# For reference, Intel code runs at 6.8 cpb rate on Opteron. +# (**) Note that Core2 result is ~15% lower than corresponding result +# for 32-bit code, meaning that it's possible to improve it, +# but more than likely at the cost of the others (see rc4-586.pl +# to get the idea)... + $flavour = shift; $output = shift; if ($flavour =~ /\./) { $output = $flavour; undef $flavour; } @@ -76,13 +119,10 @@ $len="%rsi"; # arg2 $inp="%rdx"; # arg3 $out="%rcx"; # arg4 -@XX=("%r8","%r10"); -@TX=("%r9","%r11"); -$YY="%r12"; -$TY="%r13"; - +{ $code=<<___; .text +.extern OPENSSL_ia32cap_P .globl RC4 .type RC4,\@function,4 @@ -95,48 +135,173 @@ RC4: or $len,$len push %r12 push %r13 .Lprologue: + mov $len,%r11 + mov $inp,%r12 + mov $out,%r13 +___ +my $len="%r11"; # reassign input arguments +my $inp="%r12"; +my $out="%r13"; - add \$8,$dat - movl -8($dat),$XX[0]#d - movl -4($dat),$YY#d +my @XX=("%r10","%rsi"); +my @TX=("%rax","%rbx"); +my $YY="%rcx"; +my $TY="%rdx"; + +$code.=<<___; + xor $XX[0],$XX[0] + xor $YY,$YY + + lea 8($dat),$dat + mov -8($dat),$XX[0]#b + mov -4($dat),$YY#b cmpl \$-1,256($dat) je .LRC4_CHAR + mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),%r8d + xor $TX[1],$TX[1] inc $XX[0]#b + sub $XX[0],$TX[1] + sub $inp,$out movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d - test \$-8,$len + test \$-16,$len jz .Lloop1 - jmp .Lloop8 + bt \$30,%r8d # Intel CPU? + jc .Lintel + and \$7,$TX[1] + lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] + jz .Loop8 + sub $TX[1],$len +.Loop8_warmup: + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d + movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) + movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) + add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b + inc $XX[0]#b + movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d + movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d + xorb ($inp),$TY#b + movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) + lea 1($inp),$inp + dec $TX[1] + jnz .Loop8_warmup + + lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] + jmp .Loop8 .align 16 -.Lloop8: +.Loop8: ___ for ($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { +$code.=<<___ if ($i==7); + add \$8,$XX[1]#b +___ $code.=<<___; add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b - mov $XX[0],$XX[1] movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d - ror \$8,%rax # ror is redundant when $i=0 - inc $XX[1]#b - movl ($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d - cmp $XX[1],$YY movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) - cmove $TX[0],$TX[1] - movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) + movl `4*($i==7?-1:$i)`($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d + ror \$8,%r8 # ror is redundant when $i=0 + movl $TY#d,4*$i($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b - movb ($dat,$TY,4),%al + movb ($dat,$TY,4),%r8b ___ -push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers +push(@TX,shift(@TX)); #push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; - ror \$8,%rax + add \$8,$XX[0]#b + ror \$8,%r8 sub \$8,$len - xor ($inp),%rax - add \$8,$inp - mov %rax,($out) - add \$8,$out + xor ($inp),%r8 + mov %r8,($out,$inp) + lea 8($inp),$inp test \$-8,$len - jnz .Lloop8 + jnz .Loop8 + cmp \$0,$len + jne .Lloop1 + jmp .Lexit + +.align 16 +.Lintel: + test \$-32,$len + jz .Lloop1 + and \$15,$TX[1] + jz .Loop16_is_hot + sub $TX[1],$len +.Loop16_warmup: + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d + movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) + movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) + add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b + inc $XX[0]#b + movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d + movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d + xorb ($inp),$TY#b + movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) + lea 1($inp),$inp + dec $TX[1] + jnz .Loop16_warmup + + mov $YY,$TX[1] + xor $YY,$YY + mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b + +.Loop16_is_hot: + lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1] +___ +sub RC4_loop { + my $i=shift; + my $j=$i<0?0:$i; + my $xmm="%xmm".($j&1); + + $code.=" add \$16,$XX[0]#b\n" if ($i==15); + $code.=" movdqu ($inp),%xmm2\n" if ($i==15); + $code.=" add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<=0); + $code.=" movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d\n"; + $code.=" pxor %xmm0,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); + $code.=" psllq \$8,%xmm1\n" if ($i==0); + $code.=" pxor $xmm,$xmm\n" if ($i<=1); + $code.=" movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4)\n"; + $code.=" add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b\n"; + $code.=" movl `4*($j+1)`($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i<15); + $code.=" movz $TX[0]#b,$TX[0]#d\n"; + $code.=" movl $TY#d,4*$j($XX[1])\n"; + $code.=" pxor %xmm1,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); + $code.=" lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1]\n" if ($i==15); + $code.=" add $TX[1]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<15); + $code.=" pinsrw \$`($j>>1)&7`,($dat,$TX[0],4),$xmm\n"; + $code.=" movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp)\n" if ($i==0); + $code.=" lea 16($inp),$inp\n" if ($i==0); + $code.=" movl ($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i==15); +} + RC4_loop(-1); +$code.=<<___; + jmp .Loop16_enter +.align 16 +.Loop16: +___ + +for ($i=0;$i<16;$i++) { + $code.=".Loop16_enter:\n" if ($i==1); + RC4_loop($i); + push(@TX,shift(@TX)); # "rotate" registers +} +$code.=<<___; + mov $YY,$TX[1] + xor $YY,$YY # keyword to partial register + sub \$16,$len + mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b + test \$-16,$len + jnz .Loop16 + + psllq \$8,%xmm1 + pxor %xmm0,%xmm2 + pxor %xmm1,%xmm2 + movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp) + lea 16($inp),$inp + cmp \$0,$len jne .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit @@ -152,9 +317,8 @@ $code.=<<___; movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b - inc $inp - movb $TY#b,($out) - inc $out + movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) + lea 1($inp),$inp dec $len jnz .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit @@ -165,13 +329,11 @@ $code.=<<___; movzb ($dat,$XX[0]),$TX[0]#d test \$-8,$len jz .Lcloop1 - cmpl \$0,260($dat) - jnz .Lcloop1 jmp .Lcloop8 .align 16 .Lcloop8: - mov ($inp),%eax - mov 4($inp),%ebx + mov ($inp),%r8d + mov 4($inp),%r9d ___ # unroll 2x4-wise, because 64-bit rotates kill Intel P4... for ($i=0;$i<4;$i++) { @@ -188,8 +350,8 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b - xor ($dat,$TY),%al - ror \$8,%eax + xor ($dat,$TY),%r8b + ror \$8,%r8d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } @@ -207,16 +369,16 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b - xor ($dat,$TY),%bl - ror \$8,%ebx + xor ($dat,$TY),%r9b + ror \$8,%r9d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; lea -8($len),$len - mov %eax,($out) + mov %r8d,($out) lea 8($inp),$inp - mov %ebx,4($out) + mov %r9d,4($out) lea 8($out),$out test \$-8,$len @@ -229,6 +391,7 @@ $code.=<<___; .align 16 .Lcloop1: add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + movzb $YY#b,$YY#d movzb ($dat,$YY),$TY#d movb $TX[0]#b,($dat,$YY) movb $TY#b,($dat,$XX[0]) @@ -260,16 +423,16 @@ $code.=<<___; ret .size RC4,.-RC4 ___ +} $idx="%r8"; $ido="%r9"; $code.=<<___; -.extern OPENSSL_ia32cap_P -.globl private_RC4_set_key -.type private_RC4_set_key,\@function,3 +.globl RC4_set_key +.type RC4_set_key,\@function,3 .align 16 -private_RC4_set_key: +RC4_set_key: lea 8($dat),$dat lea ($inp,$len),$inp neg $len @@ -280,12 +443,9 @@ private_RC4_set_key: xor %r11,%r11 mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),$idx#d - bt \$20,$idx#d - jnc .Lw1stloop - bt \$30,$idx#d - setc $ido#b - mov $ido#d,260($dat) - jmp .Lc1stloop + bt \$20,$idx#d # RC4_CHAR? + jc .Lc1stloop + jmp .Lw1stloop .align 16 .Lw1stloop: @@ -339,7 +499,7 @@ private_RC4_set_key: mov %eax,-8($dat) mov %eax,-4($dat) ret -.size private_RC4_set_key,.-private_RC4_set_key +.size RC4_set_key,.-RC4_set_key .globl RC4_options .type RC4_options,\@abi-omnipotent @@ -348,18 +508,20 @@ RC4_options: lea .Lopts(%rip),%rax mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),%edx bt \$20,%edx - jnc .Ldone - add \$12,%rax + jc .L8xchar bt \$30,%edx jnc .Ldone - add \$13,%rax + add \$25,%rax + ret +.L8xchar: + add \$12,%rax .Ldone: ret .align 64 .Lopts: .asciz "rc4(8x,int)" .asciz "rc4(8x,char)" -.asciz "rc4(1x,char)" +.asciz "rc4(16x,int)" .asciz "RC4 for x86_64, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>" .align 64 .size RC4_options,.-RC4_options @@ -497,7 +659,17 @@ key_se_handler: ___ } -$code =~ s/#([bwd])/$1/gm; +sub reg_part { +my ($reg,$conv)=@_; + if ($reg =~ /%r[0-9]+/) { $reg .= $conv; } + elsif ($conv eq "b") { $reg =~ s/%[er]([^x]+)x?/%$1l/; } + elsif ($conv eq "w") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%$1/; } + elsif ($conv eq "d") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%e$1/; } + return $reg; +} + +$code =~ s/(%[a-z0-9]+)#([bwd])/reg_part($1,$2)/gem; +$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem; print $code; |