diff options
| author | Ulf Möller <ulf@openssl.org> | 2001-02-14 16:55:22 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ulf Möller <ulf@openssl.org> | 2001-02-14 16:55:22 +0000 |
| commit | a6ed5dd6748cdba9fe7a832e51e0dc1e5d3b7bb4 (patch) | |
| tree | ab29ed74bdc479eb86310bb1a6b94135205416a8 /FAQ | |
| parent | 1417f2dccbaba7390d231056c99d38a5200124b8 (diff) | |
That was misleading. The problem won't happen with 0.9.6a anyway.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ')
| -rw-r--r-- | FAQ | 8 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols? * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"? -* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented" or similar? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha True64 Unix? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? @@ -324,13 +324,11 @@ You didn't install "bc", the Unix calculator. If you want to run the tests, get GNU bc from ftp://ftp.gnu.org or from your OS distributor. -* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented" or similar? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? On some SCO installations or versions, bc has a bug that gets triggered when you run the test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is -"bc: 1 not implemented". You may run into something similar on FreeBSD -(version 4.2 has been reported), where the message is "Failed! bc: tmp.bntest -3: print statement" or something similar. +"bc: 1 not implemented". The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html |