summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>2016-01-27 13:41:16 +0000
committerMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>2016-01-28 14:41:19 +0000
commit502bed22a940598bad27555d2b5c5c27a1f2edf1 (patch)
treee984d245a7106e8a72aa18ff85af9c1ec83b9bc1
parente729aac19de7b41169be82e6e55c4c898de9470a (diff)
CHANGES and NEWS updates for release
Add details about the latest issues fixed in the forthcoming release. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-rw-r--r--CHANGES46
-rw-r--r--NEWS7
2 files changed, 51 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
index 75ddadc486..4f8fff5143 100644
--- a/CHANGES
+++ b/CHANGES
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
OpenSSL CHANGES
_______________
- Changes between 1.0.2e and 1.1.0 [xx XXX xxxx]
+ Changes between 1.0.2f and 1.1.0 [xx XXX xxxx]
*) Removed many obsolete configuration items, including
DES_PTR, DES_RISC1, DES_RISC2, DES_INT
@@ -720,6 +720,50 @@
whose return value is often ignored.
[Steve Henson]
+ Changes between 1.0.2e and 1.0.2f [28 Jan 2016]
+ *) DH small subgroups
+
+ Historically OpenSSL only ever generated DH parameters based on "safe"
+ primes. More recently (in version 1.0.2) support was provided for
+ generating X9.42 style parameter files such as those required for RFC 5114
+ support. The primes used in such files may not be "safe". Where an
+ application is using DH configured with parameters based on primes that are
+ not "safe" then an attacker could use this fact to find a peer's private
+ DH exponent. This attack requires that the attacker complete multiple
+ handshakes in which the peer uses the same private DH exponent. For example
+ this could be used to discover a TLS server's private DH exponent if it's
+ reusing the private DH exponent or it's using a static DH ciphersuite.
+
+ OpenSSL provides the option SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE for ephemeral DH (DHE) in
+ TLS. It is not on by default. If the option is not set then the server
+ reuses the same private DH exponent for the life of the server process and
+ would be vulnerable to this attack. It is believed that many popular
+ applications do set this option and would therefore not be at risk.
+
+ The fix for this issue adds an additional check where a "q" parameter is
+ available (as is the case in X9.42 based parameters). This detects the
+ only known attack, and is the only possible defense for static DH
+ ciphersuites. This could have some performance impact.
+
+ Additionally the SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE option has been switched on by
+ default and cannot be disabled. This could have some performance impact.
+
+ This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Antonio Sanso (Adobe).
+ (CVE-2016-0701)
+ [Matt Caswell]
+
+ *) SSLv2 doesn't block disabled ciphers
+
+ A malicious client can negotiate SSLv2 ciphers that have been disabled on
+ the server and complete SSLv2 handshakes even if all SSLv2 ciphers have
+ been disabled, provided that the SSLv2 protocol was not also disabled via
+ SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2.
+
+ This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 26th December 2015 by Nimrod Aviram
+ and Sebastian Schinzel.
+ (CVE-2015-3197)
+ [Viktor Dukhovni]
+
Changes between 1.0.2d and 1.0.2e [3 Dec 2015]
*) BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 76f7fde846..5fc6b6c4d7 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
This file gives a brief overview of the major changes between each OpenSSL
release. For more details please read the CHANGES file.
- Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2e and OpenSSL 1.1.0 [in pre-release]
+ Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2f and OpenSSL 1.1.0 [in pre-release]
o Support for ChaCha20 and Poly1305 added to libcrypto and libssl
o Support for extended master secret
@@ -33,6 +33,11 @@
directory location rather than --openssldir. The latter becomes
the directory for certs, private key and openssl.cnf exclusively.
+ Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2e and OpenSSL 1.0.2f [28 Jan 2016]
+
+ o DH small subgroups (CVE-2016-0701)
+ o SSLv2 doesn't block disabled ciphers (CVE-2015-3197)
+
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2d and OpenSSL 1.0.2e [3 Dec 2015]
o BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64 (CVE-2015-3193)