Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
We're not actually building any i386 RPM packages, and it maes
essentially no sense to do so as the various major RPM-based distros
don't even really support 32-bit x86 installs anymore.
This will actually speed up the builds for the other package types
because they won't be competing for CI resources. It will also make the
commit history tidier in the repo.
|
|
* netdata/packaging:[ci skip] Bring over netdata.spec before removing the temp directory. We need it to resume RPM workflow
* [Package amd64 DEB] Package build stable test
* netdata/packaging:[ci skip] add branch for testing
* [Package amd64 DEB] Package build stable test
* [Package i386 DEB] Package build stable test
* [Package i386 DEB] Package build stable test
* [Package amd64 DEB] Package build stable test
* [Package i386 DEB] Package build stable test
* [Package amd64 RPM] Package build stable test
* [Package i386 RPM] Package build stable test
* netdata/doc: update distro support, due to lxc limitations we dont have those yet
* [Package i386 RPM] Package build stable test
* [Package i386 RPM Enterprise Linux] Package build stable test
* netdata/ci:[ci skip] yes, we must test rpm too
* [Package i386 RPM] Package build stable test
* [Package amd64 RPM] Package build stable test
* netdata/packaging:[ci skip] Add i386 RPM and DEB distro triggers
* netdata/packaging: [ci skip] remove the test branch info
* netdata/doc: [ci skip] fix doc
* netdata/doc: [ci skip] update doc more
|
|
packaging (#6813)
|
|
|
|
false for full repo retrieval
|
|
force pushing before approvals, i will be closely monitoring the effect by triggering nightlies on demand and evaluate the result
|