From 0dda0b3fb255048a221f736c8a2a24c674da8bf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Johansen Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:43:18 -0800 Subject: apparmor: fix ptrace label match when matching stacked labels Given a label with a profile stack of A//&B or A//&C ... A ptrace rule should be able to specify a generic trace pattern with a rule like ptrace trace A//&**, however this is failing because while the correct label match routine is called, it is being done post label decomposition so it is always being done against a profile instead of the stacked label. To fix this refactor the cross check to pass the full peer label in to the label_match. Fixes: 290f458a4f16 ("apparmor: allow ptrace checks to be finer grained than just capability") Cc: Stable Reported-by: Matthew Garrett Tested-by: Matthew Garrett Signed-off-by: John Johansen --- security/apparmor/include/perms.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'security/apparmor/include') diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/perms.h b/security/apparmor/include/perms.h index 2b27bb79aec4..d7b7e7115160 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/include/perms.h +++ b/security/apparmor/include/perms.h @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ extern struct aa_perms allperms; #define xcheck_labels_profiles(L1, L2, FN, args...) \ xcheck_ns_labels((L1), (L2), xcheck_ns_profile_label, (FN), args) +#define xcheck_labels(L1, L2, P, FN1, FN2) \ + xcheck(fn_for_each((L1), (P), (FN1)), fn_for_each((L2), (P), (FN2))) + void aa_perm_mask_to_str(char *str, const char *chrs, u32 mask); void aa_audit_perm_names(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char **names, u32 mask); -- cgit v1.2.3