From 1d082fd061884a587c490c4fc8a2056ce1e47624 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:01:53 -0700 Subject: rcu: Remove local_irq_disable() in rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() The rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() function is on a scheduling fast path, so it would be good to avoid disabling irqs. The reason that irqs are disabled is to synchronize process-level and irq-handler access to the task_struct ->rcu_read_unlock_special bitmask. This commit therefore makes ->rcu_read_unlock_special instead be a union of bools with a short allowing single-access checks in RCU's __rcu_read_unlock(). This results in the process-level and irq-handler accesses being simple loads and stores, so that irqs need no longer be disabled. This commit therefore removes the irq disabling from rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(). Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------- kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcu') diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index e466b40052a7..0981c0cd70fe 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -155,9 +155,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed); * not in a quiescent state. There might be any number of tasks blocked * while in an RCU read-side critical section. * - * Unlike the other rcu_*_qs() functions, callers to this function - * must disable irqs in order to protect the assignment to - * ->rcu_read_unlock_special. + * As with the other rcu_*_qs() functions, callers to this function + * must disable preemption. */ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu) { @@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu) if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0) trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"), rdp->gpnum, TPS("cpuqs")); rdp->passed_quiesce = 1; - current->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS; + current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false; } /* @@ -190,14 +189,14 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu) struct rcu_node *rnp; if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 && - (t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) { + !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) { /* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu); rnp = rdp->mynode; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); - t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED; + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true; t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp; /* @@ -239,7 +238,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu) : rnp->gpnum + 1); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); } else if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting < 0 && - t->rcu_read_unlock_special) { + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s) { /* * Complete exit from RCU read-side critical section on @@ -257,9 +256,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu) * grace period, then the fact that the task has been enqueued * means that we continue to block the current grace period. */ - local_irq_save(flags); rcu_preempt_qs(cpu); - local_irq_restore(flags); } /* @@ -340,7 +337,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) bool drop_boost_mutex = false; #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */ struct rcu_node *rnp; - int special; + union rcu_special special; /* NMI handlers cannot block and cannot safely manipulate state. */ if (in_nmi()) @@ -350,12 +347,13 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) /* * If RCU core is waiting for this CPU to exit critical section, - * let it know that we have done so. + * let it know that we have done so. Because irqs are disabled, + * t->rcu_read_unlock_special cannot change. */ special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special; - if (special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS) { + if (special.b.need_qs) { rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id()); - if (!t->rcu_read_unlock_special) { + if (!t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s) { local_irq_restore(flags); return; } @@ -368,8 +366,8 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) } /* Clean up if blocked during RCU read-side critical section. */ - if (special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) { - t->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED; + if (special.b.blocked) { + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = false; /* * Remove this task from the list it blocked on. The @@ -658,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu) } if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 && per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending) - t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS; + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true; } #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST @@ -941,7 +939,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void) return; t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1; barrier(); - t->rcu_read_unlock_special = RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED; + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true; __rcu_read_unlock(); } diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c index 9487b4898e51..6fb911558562 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void) barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */ t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN; barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */ - if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special))) + if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s))) rcu_read_unlock_special(t); barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */ t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0; -- cgit v1.2.3