From 28e33f9d78eefe98ea86673ab31e988b37a9a738 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:16:55 -0700 Subject: bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer Commit f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") removed the crafty selection of which pointer types are allowed to be modified. This is OK for most pointer types since adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() will catch operations on immutable pointers. One exception is PTR_TO_CTX which is now allowed to be offseted freely. The intent of aforementioned commit was to allow context access via modified registers. The offset passed to ->is_valid_access() verifier callback has been adjusted by the value of the variable offset. What is missing, however, is taking the variable offset into account when the context register is used. Or in terms of the code adding the offset to the value passed to the ->convert_ctx_access() callback. This leads to the following eBPF user code: r1 += 68 r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) exit being translated to this in kernel space: 0: (07) r1 += 68 1: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +180) 2: (95) exit Offset 8 is corresponding to 180 in the kernel, but offset 76 is valid too. Verifier will "accept" access to offset 68+8=76 but then "convert" access to offset 8 as 180. Effective access to offset 248 is beyond the kernel context. (This is a __sk_buff example on a debug-heavy kernel - packet mark is 8 -> 180, 76 would be data.) Dereferencing the modified context pointer is not as easy as dereferencing other types, because we have to translate the access to reading a field in kernel structures which is usually at a different offset and often of a different size. To allow modifying the pointer we would have to make sure that given eBPF instruction will always access the same field or the fields accessed are "compatible" in terms of offset and size... Disallow dereferencing modified context pointers and add to selftests the test case described here. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 8b8d6ba39e23..20f3889c006e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1116,7 +1116,12 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn /* ctx accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can * determine what type of data were returned. */ - if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + if (reg->off) { + verbose("dereference of modified ctx ptr R%d off=%d+%d, ctx+const is allowed, ctx+const+const is not\n", + regno, reg->off, off - reg->off); + return -EACCES; + } + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) || reg->var_off.value) { char tn_buf[48]; tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); @@ -1124,7 +1129,6 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn tn_buf, off, size); return -EACCES; } - off += reg->var_off.value; err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { /* ctx access returns either a scalar, or a -- cgit v1.2.3 From 82f8dd28bd3abe181b7a66ea4ea132134d37a400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:55:53 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix splat for illegal devmap percpu allocation It was reported that syzkaller was able to trigger a splat on devmap percpu allocation due to illegal/unsupported allocation request size passed to __alloc_percpu(): [ 70.094249] illegal size (32776) or align (8) for percpu allocation [ 70.094256] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 70.094259] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3451 at mm/percpu.c:1365 pcpu_alloc+0x96/0x630 [...] [ 70.094325] Call Trace: [ 70.094328] __alloc_percpu_gfp+0x12/0x20 [ 70.094330] dev_map_alloc+0x134/0x1e0 [ 70.094331] SyS_bpf+0x9bc/0x1610 [ 70.094333] ? selinux_task_setrlimit+0x5a/0x60 [ 70.094334] ? security_task_setrlimit+0x43/0x60 [ 70.094336] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5 This was due to too large max_entries for the map such that we surpassed the upper limit of PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE. It's fine to fail naturally here, so switch to __alloc_percpu_gfp() and pass __GFP_NOWARN instead. Fixes: 11393cc9b9be ("xdp: Add batching support to redirect map") Reported-by: Mark Rutland Reported-by: Shankara Pailoor Reported-by: Richard Weinberger Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: John Fastabend Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c index e093d9a2c4dd..920428d84da2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c @@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) err = -ENOMEM; /* A per cpu bitfield with a bit per possible net device */ - dtab->flush_needed = __alloc_percpu(dev_map_bitmap_size(attr), - __alignof__(unsigned long)); + dtab->flush_needed = __alloc_percpu_gfp(dev_map_bitmap_size(attr), + __alignof__(unsigned long), + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN); if (!dtab->flush_needed) goto free_dtab; -- cgit v1.2.3 From bc6d5031b43a2291de638ab9304320b4cae61689 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:55:54 +0200 Subject: bpf: do not test for PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE before percpu allocations PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE is an implementation detail of the percpu allocator. Given we support __GFP_NOWARN now, lets just let the allocation request fail naturally instead. The two call sites from BPF mistakenly assumed __GFP_NOWARN would work, so no changes needed to their actual __alloc_percpu_gfp() calls which use the flag already. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c index 98c0f00c3f5e..e2636737b69b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) array_size += (u64) attr->max_entries * elem_size * num_possible_cpus(); if (array_size >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE || - elem_size > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE || bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array)) { + bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array)) { bpf_map_area_free(array); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index 431126f31ea3..6533f08d1238 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -317,10 +317,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) */ goto free_htab; - if (percpu && round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8) > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE) - /* make sure the size for pcpu_alloc() is reasonable */ - goto free_htab; - htab->elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8); if (percpu) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 435bf0d3f99a164df7e8c30428cef266b91d1d3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:10:15 -0700 Subject: bpf: enforce TCP only support for sockmap Only TCP sockets have been tested and at the moment the state change callback only handles TCP sockets. This adds a check to ensure that sockets actually being added are TCP sockets. For net-next we can consider UDP support. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index 6424ce0e4969..c68899d5b246 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -840,6 +840,12 @@ static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, return -EINVAL; } + if (skops.sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM || + skops.sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) { + fput(socket->file); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + err = sock_map_ctx_update_elem(&skops, map, key, flags); fput(socket->file); return err; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 34f79502bbcfab659b8729da68b5e387f96eb4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:10:36 -0700 Subject: bpf: avoid preempt enable/disable in sockmap using tcp_skb_cb region SK_SKB BPF programs are run from the socket/tcp context but early in the stack before much of the TCP metadata is needed in tcp_skb_cb. So we can use some unused fields to place BPF metadata needed for SK_SKB programs when implementing the redirect function. This allows us to drop the preempt disable logic. It does however require an API change so sk_redirect_map() has been updated to additionally provide ctx_ptr to skb. Note, we do however continue to disable/enable preemption around actual BPF program running to account for map updates. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index c68899d5b246..beaabb21c3a3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include struct bpf_stab { struct bpf_map map; @@ -101,9 +102,16 @@ static int smap_verdict_func(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) return SK_DROP; skb_orphan(skb); + /* We need to ensure that BPF metadata for maps is also cleared + * when we orphan the skb so that we don't have the possibility + * to reference a stale map. + */ + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->bpf.map = NULL; skb->sk = psock->sock; bpf_compute_data_end(skb); + preempt_disable(); rc = (*prog->bpf_func)(skb, prog->insnsi); + preempt_enable(); skb->sk = NULL; return rc; @@ -114,17 +122,10 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) struct sock *sk; int rc; - /* Because we use per cpu values to feed input from sock redirect - * in BPF program to do_sk_redirect_map() call we need to ensure we - * are not preempted. RCU read lock is not sufficient in this case - * with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU enabled so we must be explicit here. - */ - preempt_disable(); rc = smap_verdict_func(psock, skb); switch (rc) { case SK_REDIRECT: - sk = do_sk_redirect_map(); - preempt_enable(); + sk = do_sk_redirect_map(skb); if (likely(sk)) { struct smap_psock *peer = smap_psock_sk(sk); @@ -141,8 +142,6 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) /* Fall through and free skb otherwise */ case SK_DROP: default: - if (rc != SK_REDIRECT) - preempt_enable(); kfree_skb(skb); } } -- cgit v1.2.3 From fb50df8d32283cd95932a182a46a10070c4a8832 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:11:22 -0700 Subject: bpf: require CAP_NET_ADMIN when using sockmap maps Restrict sockmap to CAP_NET_ADMIN. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index beaabb21c3a3..2b6eb35ae5d3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -486,6 +486,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) int err = -EINVAL; u64 cost; + if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); + /* check sanity of attributes */ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 || attr->value_size != 4 || attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 9ef2a8cd5c0dcb8e1f1534615c56eb13b630c363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:11:44 -0700 Subject: bpf: require CAP_NET_ADMIN when using devmap Devmap is used with XDP which requires CAP_NET_ADMIN so lets also make CAP_NET_ADMIN required to use the map. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c index 920428d84da2..52e0548ba548 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) int err = -EINVAL; u64 cost; + if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); + /* check sanity of attributes */ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 || attr->value_size != 4 || attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8695a5395661fbb4a4f26c97f801f3800ae4754e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:03:52 -0700 Subject: bpf: devmap fix arithmetic overflow in bitmap_size calculation An integer overflow is possible in dev_map_bitmap_size() when calculating the BITS_TO_LONG logic which becomes, after macro replacement, (((n) + (d) - 1)/ (d)) where 'n' is a __u32 and 'd' is (8 * sizeof(long)). To avoid overflow cast to u64 before arithmetic. Reported-by: Richard Weinberger Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c index 52e0548ba548..e745d6a88224 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dev_map_list); static u64 dev_map_bitmap_size(const union bpf_attr *attr) { - return BITS_TO_LONGS(attr->max_entries) * sizeof(unsigned long); + return BITS_TO_LONGS((u64) attr->max_entries) * sizeof(unsigned long); } static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) -- cgit v1.2.3 From fb2a311a31d3457fe8c3ee16f5609877e2ead9f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:21 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns During review I noticed that the current logic for direct packet access marking in check_cond_jmp_op() has an off by one for the upper right range border when marking in find_good_pkt_pointers() with BPF_JLT and BPF_JLE. It's not really harmful given access up to pkt_end is always safe, but we should nevertheless correct the range marking before it becomes ABI. If pkt_data' denotes a pkt_data derived pointer (pkt_data + X), then for pkt_data' < pkt_end in the true branch as well as for pkt_end <= pkt_data' in the false branch we mark the range with X although it should really be X - 1 in these cases. For example, X could be pkt_end - pkt_data, then when testing for pkt_data' < pkt_end the verifier simulation cannot deduce that a byte load of pkt_data' - 1 would succeed in this branch. Fixes: b4e432f1000a ("bpf: enable BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE} opcodes in verifier") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 20f3889c006e..49cb5ad14746 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2430,12 +2430,15 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg) + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + bool range_right_open) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; + u16 new_range; int i; - if (dst_reg->off < 0) + if (dst_reg->off < 0 || + (dst_reg->off == 0 && range_right_open)) /* This doesn't give us any range */ return; @@ -2446,9 +2449,13 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, */ return; - /* LLVM can generate four kind of checks: + new_range = dst_reg->off; + if (range_right_open) + new_range--; + + /* Examples for register markings: * - * Type 1/2: + * pkt_data in dst register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; @@ -2465,7 +2472,7 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, * r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0) * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * - * Type 3/4: + * pkt_data in src register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; @@ -2483,7 +2490,9 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * * Find register r3 and mark its range as r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8) - * so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) is safe to access. + * or r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8-1), so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) + * and [r3, r3 + 8-1) respectively is safe to access depending on + * the check. */ /* If our ids match, then we must have the same max_value. And we @@ -2494,14 +2503,14 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id) /* keep the maximum range already checked */ - regs[i].range = max_t(u16, regs[i].range, dst_reg->off); + regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) continue; reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id) - reg->range = max_t(u16, reg->range, dst_reg->off); + reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); } } @@ -2865,19 +2874,19 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg); + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg); + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg]); + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg]); + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); return -EACCES; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0fd4759c5515b7f2297d7fee5c45e5d9dd733001 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:22 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix pattern matches for direct packet access Alexander had a test program with direct packet access, where the access test was in the form of data + X > data_end. In an unrelated change to the program LLVM decided to swap the branches and emitted code for the test in form of data + X <= data_end. We hadn't seen these being generated previously, thus verifier would reject the program. Therefore, fix up the verifier to detect all test cases, so we don't run into such issues in the future. Fixes: b4e432f1000a ("bpf: enable BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE} opcodes in verifier") Reported-by: Alexander Alemayhu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 49cb5ad14746..c48ca2a34b5e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2874,18 +2874,42 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' > pkt_end */ find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end > pkt_data' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' < pkt_end */ find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, true); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLT && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end < pkt_data' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' >= pkt_end */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, true); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end >= pkt_data' */ find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], false); + } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && + dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + /* pkt_data' <= pkt_end */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, false); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JLE && dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + /* pkt_end <= pkt_data' */ find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg], true); } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); -- cgit v1.2.3