From f0f3588f7a95bb8e02b0f8f5138efb7064665730 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 21:51:31 -0500 Subject: kernfs: don't bother with timestamp truncation kernfs users are not going to have limited range or granularity anyway. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/kernfs/inode.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/kernfs') diff --git a/fs/kernfs/inode.c b/fs/kernfs/inode.c index eac277c63d42..d0f7a5abd9a9 100644 --- a/fs/kernfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/kernfs/inode.c @@ -160,9 +160,9 @@ static inline void set_inode_attr(struct inode *inode, { inode->i_uid = attrs->ia_uid; inode->i_gid = attrs->ia_gid; - inode->i_atime = timestamp_truncate(attrs->ia_atime, inode); - inode->i_mtime = timestamp_truncate(attrs->ia_mtime, inode); - inode->i_ctime = timestamp_truncate(attrs->ia_ctime, inode); + inode->i_atime = attrs->ia_atime; + inode->i_mtime = attrs->ia_mtime; + inode->i_ctime = attrs->ia_ctime; } static void kernfs_refresh_inode(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct inode *inode) -- cgit v1.2.3