From 9cbbc451098ec1e9942886023203b2247dec94bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:43:57 +0100 Subject: sfc: take correct lock in ef100_reset() When downing and upping the ef100 filter table, we need to take a write lock on efx->filter_sem, not just a read lock, because we may kfree() the table pointers. Without this, resets cause a WARN_ON from efx_rwsem_assert_write_locked(). Fixes: a9dc3d5612ce ("sfc_ef100: RX filter table management and related gubbins") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c index b8a7e9ed7913..19fe86b3b316 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c @@ -431,18 +431,18 @@ static int ef100_reset(struct efx_nic *efx, enum reset_type reset_type) /* A RESET_TYPE_ALL will cause filters to be removed, so we remove filters * and reprobe after reset to avoid removing filters twice */ - down_read(&efx->filter_sem); + down_write(&efx->filter_sem); ef100_filter_table_down(efx); - up_read(&efx->filter_sem); + up_write(&efx->filter_sem); rc = efx_mcdi_reset(efx, reset_type); if (rc) return rc; netif_device_attach(efx->net_dev); - down_read(&efx->filter_sem); + down_write(&efx->filter_sem); rc = ef100_filter_table_up(efx); - up_read(&efx->filter_sem); + up_write(&efx->filter_sem); if (rc) return rc; -- cgit v1.2.3