From bdf117674ef14664f7d943b141e3b366dee2fea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Wiedmann Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:11:13 +0100 Subject: s390/qdio: make SBAL address array type-safe There is no need to use void pointers, all drivers are in agreement about the underlying data structure of the SBAL arrays. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/s390/scsi') diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c index 10c4e8e3fd59..661436a92f8e 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static void zfcp_qdio_setup_init_data(struct qdio_initialize *id, id->input_handler = zfcp_qdio_int_resp; id->output_handler = zfcp_qdio_int_req; id->int_parm = (unsigned long) qdio; - id->input_sbal_addr_array = (void **) (qdio->res_q); - id->output_sbal_addr_array = (void **) (qdio->req_q); + id->input_sbal_addr_array = qdio->res_q; + id->output_sbal_addr_array = qdio->req_q; id->scan_threshold = QDIO_MAX_BUFFERS_PER_Q - ZFCP_QDIO_MAX_SBALS_PER_REQ * 2; } -- cgit v1.2.3