From b3fb36ed694b05738d45218ea72cf7feb10ce2b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Rowand Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:42:46 -0500 Subject: of: unittest: kmemleak on changeset destroy kmemleak reports several memory leaks from devicetree unittest. This is the fix for problem 1 of 5. of_unittest_changeset() reaches deeply into the dynamic devicetree functions. Several nodes were left with an elevated reference count and thus were not properly cleaned up. Fix the reference counts so that the memory will be freed. Fixes: 201c910bd689 ("of: Transactional DT support.") Reported-by: Erhard F. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/of') diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 7e27670c3616..20ff2dfc3143 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -861,6 +861,10 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset(void) unittest(!of_changeset_revert(&chgset), "revert failed\n"); of_changeset_destroy(&chgset); + + of_node_put(n1); + of_node_put(n2); + of_node_put(n21); #endif } -- cgit v1.2.3 From 216830d2413cc61be3f76bc02ffd905e47d2439e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Rowand Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:42:47 -0500 Subject: of: unittest: kmemleak in of_unittest_platform_populate() kmemleak reports several memory leaks from devicetree unittest. This is the fix for problem 2 of 5. of_unittest_platform_populate() left an elevated reference count for grandchild nodes (which are platform devices). Fix the platform device reference counts so that the memory will be freed. Fixes: fb2caa50fbac ("of/selftest: add testcase for nodes with same name and address") Reported-by: Erhard F. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/of') diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 20ff2dfc3143..4c7818276857 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -1247,10 +1247,13 @@ static void __init of_unittest_platform_populate(void) of_platform_populate(np, match, NULL, &test_bus->dev); for_each_child_of_node(np, child) { - for_each_child_of_node(child, grandchild) - unittest(of_find_device_by_node(grandchild), + for_each_child_of_node(child, grandchild) { + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(grandchild); + unittest(pdev, "Could not create device for node '%pOFn'\n", grandchild); + of_dev_put(pdev); + } } of_platform_depopulate(&test_bus->dev); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 145fc138f9aae4f9e1331352e301df28e16aed35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Rowand Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:42:48 -0500 Subject: of: unittest: kmemleak in of_unittest_overlay_high_level() kmemleak reports several memory leaks from devicetree unittest. This is the fix for problem 3 of 5. of_unittest_overlay_high_level() failed to kfree the newly created property when the property named 'name' is skipped. Fixes: 39a751a4cb7e ("of: change overlay apply input data from unflattened to FDT") Reported-by: Erhard F. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/of') diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 4c7818276857..f238b7a3865d 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -3094,8 +3094,11 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) goto err_unlock; } if (__of_add_property(of_symbols, new_prop)) { + kfree(new_prop->name); + kfree(new_prop->value); + kfree(new_prop); /* "name" auto-generated by unflatten */ - if (!strcmp(new_prop->name, "name")) + if (!strcmp(prop->name, "name")) continue; unittest(0, "duplicate property '%s' in overlay_base node __symbols__", prop->name); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 478ff649b1c8eb2409b1a54fb75eb46f7c29f140 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Rowand Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:42:49 -0500 Subject: of: overlay: kmemleak in dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop() kmemleak reports several memory leaks from devicetree unittest. This is the fix for problem 4 of 5. target_path was not freed in the non-error path. Fixes: e0a58f3e08d4 ("of: overlay: remove a dependency on device node full_name") Reported-by: Erhard F. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/overlay.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/of') diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c index c9219fddf44b..50bbe0edf538 100644 --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c @@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ static struct property *dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop( of_property_set_flag(new_prop, OF_DYNAMIC); + kfree(target_path); + return new_prop; err_free_new_prop: -- cgit v1.2.3 From 29acfb65598f91671413869e0d0a1ec4e74ac705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Rowand Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:42:50 -0500 Subject: of: unittest: kmemleak in duplicate property update kmemleak reports several memory leaks from devicetree unittest. This is the fix for problem 5 of 5. When overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_prop' is applied, the apply code properly detects that a memory leak will occur if the overlay is removed since the duplicate property is located in a base devicetree node and reports via printk(): OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail The overlay is removed when the apply code detects multiple changesets modifying the same property. This is reported via printk(): OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail As a result of this error, the overlay is removed resulting in the expected memory leak. Add another device node level to the overlay so that the duplicate property is located in a node added by the overlay, thus no memory leak will occur when the overlay is removed. Thus users of kmemleak will not have to debug this leak in the future. Fixes: 2fe0e8769df9 ("of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property") Reported-by: Erhard F. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts | 23 ++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/of/unittest.c | 12 +++++------ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/of') diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts index c190da54f175..6327d1ffb963 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts @@ -3,22 +3,37 @@ /plugin/; /* - * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: - * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * &electric_1/motor-1/electric and &spin_ctrl_1/electric are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric * * Thus the property "rpm_avail" in each fragment will * result in an attempt to update the same property twice. * This will result in an error and the overlay apply * will fail. + * + * The previous version of this test did not include the extra + * level of node 'electric'. That resulted in the 'rpm_avail' + * property being located in the pre-existing node 'motor-1'. + * Modifying a property results in a WARNING that a memory leak + * will occur if the overlay is removed. Since the overlay apply + * fails, the memory leak does actually occur, and kmemleak will + * further report the memory leak if CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK is + * enabled. Adding the overlay node 'electric' avoids the + * memory leak and thus people who use kmemleak will not + * have to debug this non-problem again. */ &electric_1 { motor-1 { - rpm_avail = < 100 >; + electric { + rpm_avail = < 100 >; + }; }; }; &spin_ctrl_1 { - rpm_avail = < 100 200 >; + electric { + rpm_avail = < 100 200 >; + }; }; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index f238b7a3865d..398de04fd19c 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -3181,21 +3181,21 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add and/or delete node /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/controller"); EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add and/or delete node /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric"); EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric/rpm_avail"); EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric/name"); unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_prop", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_prop' failed\n"); EXPECT_END(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric/name"); EXPECT_END(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric/rpm_avail"); EXPECT_END(KERN_ERR, - "OF: overlay: WARNING: memory leak will occur if overlay removed, property: /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail"); + "OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple fragments add and/or delete node /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/electric"); unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n"); -- cgit v1.2.3