From ca0168e8a77cf833f8c9ac1d26a3a4012bab4f72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:32:25 -0500 Subject: alloc_super(): do ->s_umount initialization earlier ... so that failure exits could count on it having been done. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/super.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index d4e33e8f1e6f..7ff1349609e4 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -191,6 +191,24 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_mounts); s->s_user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns); + init_rwsem(&s->s_umount); + lockdep_set_class(&s->s_umount, &type->s_umount_key); + /* + * sget() can have s_umount recursion. + * + * When it cannot find a suitable sb, it allocates a new + * one (this one), and tries again to find a suitable old + * one. + * + * In case that succeeds, it will acquire the s_umount + * lock of the old one. Since these are clearly distrinct + * locks, and this object isn't exposed yet, there's no + * risk of deadlocks. + * + * Annotate this by putting this lock in a different + * subclass. + */ + down_write_nested(&s->s_umount, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); if (security_sb_alloc(s)) goto fail; @@ -218,25 +236,6 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, goto fail; if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_inode_lru)) goto fail; - - init_rwsem(&s->s_umount); - lockdep_set_class(&s->s_umount, &type->s_umount_key); - /* - * sget() can have s_umount recursion. - * - * When it cannot find a suitable sb, it allocates a new - * one (this one), and tries again to find a suitable old - * one. - * - * In case that succeeds, it will acquire the s_umount - * lock of the old one. Since these are clearly distrinct - * locks, and this object isn't exposed yet, there's no - * risk of deadlocks. - * - * Annotate this by putting this lock in a different - * subclass. - */ - down_write_nested(&s->s_umount, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); s->s_count = 1; atomic_set(&s->s_active, 1); mutex_init(&s->s_vfs_rename_mutex); -- cgit v1.2.3 From d7ee946942bdd12394809305e3df05aa4c8b7b8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Trippelsdorf Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:01:31 +0200 Subject: VFS: Handle lazytime in do_mount() Since commit e462ec50cb5fa ("VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags") the lazytime mount option doesn't get passed on anymore. Fix the issue by handling the option in do_mount(). Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner Signed-off-by: Markus Trippelsdorf Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/namespace.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c index e158ec6b527b..9d1374ab6e06 100644 --- a/fs/namespace.c +++ b/fs/namespace.c @@ -2826,6 +2826,7 @@ long do_mount(const char *dev_name, const char __user *dir_name, SB_DIRSYNC | SB_SILENT | SB_POSIXACL | + SB_LAZYTIME | SB_I_VERSION); if (flags & MS_REMOUNT) -- cgit v1.2.3