| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Due to several devices being unable to handle this procedure reliably
(resulting in forced disconnections before pairing completes) it's
better to remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
For remotely initiated just-works pairings we want to show the user a
confirmation dialog for the pairing. However, we can only know which
side was the initiator by tracking which side sends the first Security
Request or Pairing Request PDU. This patch adds a new SMP flag to
indicate whether our side was the initiator for the pairing.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
In some cases the current 250ms delay is not enough for the remote to
receive the keys, as can be witnessed by the following log:
> ACL Data RX: Handle 64 flags 0x02 dlen 21 [hci1] 231.414217
SMP: Signing Information (0x0a) len 16
Signature key: 555bb66b7ab3abc9d5c287c97fe6eb29
< ACL Data TX: Handle 64 flags 0x00 dlen 21 [hci1] 231.414414
SMP: Encryption Information (0x06) len 16
Long term key: 2a7cdc233c9a4b1f3ed31dd9843fea29
< ACL Data TX: Handle 64 flags 0x00 dlen 15 [hci1] 231.414466
SMP: Master Identification (0x07) len 10
EDIV: 0xeccc
Rand: 0x322e0ef50bd9308a
< ACL Data TX: Handle 64 flags 0x00 dlen 21 [hci1] 231.414505
SMP: Signing Information (0x0a) len 16
Signature key: bbda1b2076e2325aa66fbcdd5388f745
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 [hci1] 231.483130
Num handles: 1
Handle: 64
Count: 2
< HCI Command: LE Start Encryption (0x08|0x0019) plen 28 [hci1] 231.664211
Handle: 64
Random number: 0x5052ad2b75fed54b
Encrypted diversifier: 0xb7c2
Long term key: a336ede66711b49a84bde9b41426692e
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 [hci1] 231.666937
LE Start Encryption (0x08|0x0019) ncmd 1
Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 [hci1] 231.712646
Num handles: 1
Handle: 64
Count: 1
> HCI Event: Disconnect Complete (0x05) plen 4 [hci1] 232.562587
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 64
Reason: Remote User Terminated Connection (0x13)
As can be seen, the last key (Signing Information) is sent at 231.414505
but the completed packets event for it comes only at 231.712646,
i.e. roughly 298ms later.
To have a better margin of error this patch increases the delay to
500ms.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
The connection signature resolving key (CSRK) is used for attribute
protocol signed write procedures. This change generates a new local
key during pairing and requests the peer key as well.
Newly generated key and received key will be provided to userspace
using the New Signature Resolving Key management event.
The Master CSRK can be used for verification of remote signed write
PDUs and the Slave CSRK can be used for sending signed write PDUs
to the remote device.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
|
|
Some devices may refuse to re-encrypt with the LTK if they haven't
received all our keys yet. This patch adds a 250ms delay before
attempting re-encryption with the LTK.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
It's not strictly speaking required to re-encrypt a link once we receive
an LTK since the connection is already encrypted with the STK. However,
re-encrypting with the LTK allows us to verify that we've received an
LTK that actually works.
This patch updates the SMP code to request encrypting with the LTK in
case we're in master role and waits until the key refresh complete event
before notifying user space of the distributed keys.
A new flag is also added for the SMP context to ensure that we
re-encryption only once in case of multiple calls to smp_distribute_keys.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
The random numbers in Bluetooth Low Energy are 64-bit numbers and should
also be little endian since the HCI specification is little endian.
Change the whole Low Energy pairing to use __le64 instead of a byte
array.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
|
|
Now that to-be-received keys are properly tracked we no-longer need the
"force" parameter to smp_distribute_keys(). It was essentially acting as
an indicator whether all keys have been received, but now it's just
redundant together with smp->remote_key_dist.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
We need a function in smp.c to generate Resolvable Random Addresses in
order to support privacy. The local RPA will need to be generated before
advertising, scanning or connecting and regenerated at periodic
intervals. This patch adds the necessary function for RPA generation.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
As preparation to do mgmt notification in a single place at the end of
the key distribution, store the keys that need to be notified within the
SMP context.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
When we initiate pairing through mgmt_pair_device the code has so far
been waiting for a successful HCI Encrypt Change event in order to
respond to the mgmt command. However, putting privacy into the play we
actually want the key distribution to be complete before replying so
that we can include the Identity Address in the mgmt response.
This patch updates the various hci_conn callbacks for LE in mgmt.c to
only respond in the case of failure, and adds a new mgmt_smp_complete
function that the SMP code will call once key distribution has been
completed.
Since the smp_chan_destroy function that's used to indicate completion
and clean up the SMP context can be called from various places,
including outside of smp.c, the easiest way to track failure vs success
is a new flag that we set once key distribution has been successfully
completed.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
Now that each HCI device has its own AES crypto context we don't need
the one stored in the SMP data any more. This patch removes the variable
from struct smp_chan and updates the SMP code to use the per-hdev crypto
context.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
This patch does the necessary changes to request the remote device to
distribute its IRK to us during the SMP pairing procedure. This includes
setting the right key distribution values in the pairing
request/response and handling of the two related SMP PDUs, i.e. Identity
Information and Identity Address Information.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
This patch adds a helper function to check whether a given IRK matches a
given Resolvable Private Address (RPA). The function will be needed for
implementing the rest of address resolving support.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
This patch fixes a couple of unnecessary empty lines in the SMP code.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
This function is needed both by the smp_conn_security function as well
as upcoming code to check for the security requirements when receiving
an L2CAP connect request over LE.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
The smp.h header file is only used internally by the bluetooth.ko
module and is not a public API. So make it local to the core
Bluetooth module.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
|
