summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/page_alloc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-06-03mm, page_alloc: recalculate the preferred zoneref if the context can ignore ↵Mel Gorman
memory policies The optimistic fast path may use cpuset_current_mems_allowed instead of of a NULL nodemask supplied by the caller for cpuset allocations. The preferred zone is calculated on this basis for statistic purposes and as a starting point in the zonelist iterator. However, if the context can ignore memory policies due to being atomic or being able to ignore watermarks then the starting point in the zonelist iterator is no longer correct. This patch resets the zonelist iterator in the allocator slowpath if the context can ignore memory policies. This will alter the zone used for statistics but only after it is known that it makes sense for that context. Resetting it before entering the slowpath would potentially allow an ALLOC_CPUSET allocation to be accounted for against the wrong zone. Note that while nodemask is not explicitly set to the original nodemask, it would only have been overwritten if cpuset_enabled() and it was reset before the slowpath was entered. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160602103936.GU2527@techsingularity.net Fixes: c33d6c06f60f710 ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice") Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-03mm, page_alloc: reset zonelist iterator after resetting fair zone allocation ↵Mel Gorman
policy Geert Uytterhoeven reported the following problem that bisected to commit c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice") on m68k/ARAnyM BUG: scheduling while atomic: cron/668/0x10c9a0c0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 668 Comm: cron Not tainted 4.6.0-atari-05133-gc33d6c06f60f710f #364 Call Trace: [<0003d7d0>] __schedule_bug+0x40/0x54 __schedule+0x312/0x388 __schedule+0x0/0x388 prepare_to_wait+0x0/0x52 schedule+0x64/0x82 schedule_timeout+0xda/0x104 set_next_entity+0x18/0x40 pick_next_task_fair+0x78/0xda io_schedule_timeout+0x36/0x4a bit_wait_io+0x0/0x40 bit_wait_io+0x12/0x40 __wait_on_bit+0x46/0x76 wait_on_page_bit_killable+0x64/0x6c bit_wait_io+0x0/0x40 wake_bit_function+0x0/0x4e __lock_page_or_retry+0xde/0x124 do_scan_async+0x114/0x17c lookup_swap_cache+0x24/0x4e handle_mm_fault+0x626/0x7de find_vma+0x0/0x66 down_read+0x0/0xe wait_on_page_bit_killable_timeout+0x77/0x7c find_vma+0x16/0x66 do_page_fault+0xe6/0x23a res_func+0xa3c/0x141a buserr_c+0x190/0x6d4 res_func+0xa3c/0x141a buserr+0x20/0x28 res_func+0xa3c/0x141a buserr+0x20/0x28 The relationship is not obvious but it's due to a failure to rescan the full zonelist after the fair zone allocation policy exhausts the batch count. While this is a functional problem, it's also a performance issue. A page allocator microbenchmark showed the following 4.7.0-rc1 4.7.0-rc1 vanilla reset-v1r2 Min alloc-odr0-1 327.00 ( 0.00%) 326.00 ( 0.31%) Min alloc-odr0-2 235.00 ( 0.00%) 235.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-4 198.00 ( 0.00%) 198.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-8 170.00 ( 0.00%) 170.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-16 156.00 ( 0.00%) 156.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-32 150.00 ( 0.00%) 150.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-64 146.00 ( 0.00%) 146.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-128 145.00 ( 0.00%) 145.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-256 155.00 ( 0.00%) 155.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-512 168.00 ( 0.00%) 165.00 ( 1.79%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 175.00 ( 0.00%) 174.00 ( 0.57%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 180.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 187.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 0.53%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 190.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-16384 191.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr1-1 736.00 ( 0.00%) 445.00 ( 39.54%) Min alloc-odr1-2 343.00 ( 0.00%) 335.00 ( 2.33%) Min alloc-odr1-4 277.00 ( 0.00%) 270.00 ( 2.53%) Min alloc-odr1-8 238.00 ( 0.00%) 233.00 ( 2.10%) Min alloc-odr1-16 224.00 ( 0.00%) 218.00 ( 2.68%) Min alloc-odr1-32 210.00 ( 0.00%) 208.00 ( 0.95%) Min alloc-odr1-64 207.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 1.93%) Min alloc-odr1-128 276.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 26.81%) Min alloc-odr1-256 206.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 1.94%) Min alloc-odr1-512 207.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 2.42%) Min alloc-odr1-1024 208.00 ( 0.00%) 205.00 ( 1.44%) Min alloc-odr1-2048 213.00 ( 0.00%) 212.00 ( 0.47%) Min alloc-odr1-4096 218.00 ( 0.00%) 216.00 ( 0.92%) Min alloc-odr1-8192 341.00 ( 0.00%) 219.00 ( 35.78%) Note that order-0 allocations are unaffected but higher orders get a small boost from this patch and a large reduction in system CPU usage overall as can be seen here: 4.7.0-rc1 4.7.0-rc1 vanilla reset-v1r2 User 85.32 86.31 System 2221.39 2053.36 Elapsed 2368.89 2202.47 Fixes: c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531100848.GR2527@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Tested-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-03mm, page_alloc: prevent infinite loop in buffered_rmqueue()Vlastimil Babka
In DEBUG_VM kernel, we can hit infinite loop for order == 0 in buffered_rmqueue() when check_new_pcp() returns 1, because the bad page is never removed from the pcp list. Fix this by removing the page before retrying. Also we don't need to check if page is non-NULL, because we simply grab it from the list which was just tested for being non-empty. Fixes: 479f854a207c ("mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of pages allocated from the PCP") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160530090154.GM2527@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-03mm: check the return value of lookup_page_ext for all call sitesYang Shi
Per the discussion with Joonsoo Kim [1], we need check the return value of lookup_page_ext() for all call sites since it might return NULL in some cases, although it is unlikely, i.e. memory hotplug. Tested with ltp with "page_owner=0". [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160519002809.GA10245@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build-breaking typos] [arnd@arndb.de: fix build problems from lookup_page_ext] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6285269.2CksypHdYp@wuerfel [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464023768-31025-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: check_new_page_bad() directly returns in __PG_HWPOISON caseNaoya Horiguchi
Currently we check page->flags twice for "HWPoisoned" case of check_new_page_bad(), which can cause a race with unpoisoning. This race unnecessarily taints kernel with "BUG: Bad page state". check_new_page_bad() is the only caller of bad_page() which is interested in __PG_HWPOISON, so let's move the hwpoison related code in bad_page() to it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160518100949.GA17299@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, kasan: fix to call kasan_free_pages() after poisoning pageseokhoon.yoon
When CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING and CONFIG_KASAN is enabled, free_pages_prepare()'s codeflow is below. 1)kmemcheck_free_shadow() 2)kasan_free_pages() - set shadow byte of page is freed 3)kernel_poison_pages() 3.1) check access to page is valid or not using kasan ---> error occur, kasan think it is invalid access 3.2) poison page 4)kernel_map_pages() So kasan_free_pages() should be called after poisoning the page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463220405-7455-1-git-send-email-iamyooon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: seokhoon.yoon <iamyooon@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: use phys_addr_t for reserve_bootmem_region() argumentsStefan Bader
Since commit 92923ca3aace ("mm: meminit: only set page reserved in the memblock region") the reserved bit is set on reserved memblock regions. However start and end address are passed as unsigned long. This is only 32bit on i386, so it can end up marking the wrong pages reserved for ranges at 4GB and above. This was observed on a 32bit Xen dom0 which was booted with initial memory set to a value below 4G but allowing to balloon in memory (dom0_mem=1024M for example). This would define a reserved bootmem region for the additional memory (for example on a 8GB system there was a reverved region covering the 4GB-8GB range). But since the addresses were passed on as unsigned long, this was actually marking all pages from 0 to 4GB as reserved. Fixes: 92923ca3aacef63 ("mm: meminit: only set page reserved in the memblock region") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463491221-10573-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.2+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: use existing helper to convert "on"/"off" to booleanMinfei Huang
It's more convenient to use existing function helper to convert string "on/off" to boolean. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461908824-16129-1-git-send-email-mnghuan@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for !CONFIG_COMPACTIONMichal Hocko
Joonsoo has reported that he is able to trigger OOM for !costly high order requests (heavy fork() workload close the OOM) with the new oom detection rework. This is because we rely only on should_reclaim_retry when the compaction is disabled and it only checks watermarks for the requested order and so we might trigger OOM when there is a lot of free memory. It is not very clear what are the usual workloads when the compaction is disabled. Relying on high order allocations heavily without any mechanism to create those orders except for unbound amount of reclaim is certainly not a good idea. To prevent from potential regressions let's help this configuration some. We have to sacrifice the determinsm though because there simply is none here possible. should_compact_retry implementation for !CONFIG_COMPACTION, which was empty so far, will do watermark check for order-0 on all eligible zones. This will cause retrying until either the reclaim cannot make any further progress or all the zones are depleted even for order-0 pages. This means that the number of retries is basically unbounded for !costly orders but that was the case before the rework as well so this shouldn't regress. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, oom, compaction: prevent from should_compact_retry looping for ever for ↵Michal Hocko
costly orders "mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation" has removed the upper bound for the reclaim/compaction retries based on the number of reclaimed pages for costly orders. While this is desirable the patch did miss a mis interaction between reclaim, compaction and the retry logic. The direct reclaim tries to get zones over min watermark while compaction backs off and returns COMPACT_SKIPPED when all zones are below low watermark + 1<<order gap. If we are getting really close to OOM then __compaction_suitable can keep returning COMPACT_SKIPPED a high order request (e.g. hugetlb order-9) while the reclaim is not able to release enough pages to get us over low watermark. The reclaim is still able to make some progress (usually trashing over few remaining pages) so we are not able to break out from the loop. I have seen this happening with the same test described in "mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation" on a swapless system. The original problem got resolved by "vmscan: consider classzone_idx in compaction_ready" but it shows how things might go wrong when we approach the oom event horizont. The reason why compaction requires being over low rather than min watermark is not clear to me. This check was there essentially since 56de7263fcf3 ("mm: compaction: direct compact when a high-order allocation fails"). It is clearly an implementation detail though and we shouldn't pull it into the generic retry logic while we should be able to cope with such eventuality. The only place in should_compact_retry where we retry without any upper bound is for compaction_withdrawn() case. Introduce compaction_zonelist_suitable function which checks the given zonelist and returns true only if there is at least one zone which would would unblock __compaction_suitable if more memory got reclaimed. In this implementation it checks __compaction_suitable with NR_FREE_PAGES plus part of the reclaimable memory as the target for the watermark check. The reclaimable memory is reduced linearly by the allocation order. The idea is that we do not want to reclaim all the remaining memory for a single allocation request just unblock __compaction_suitable which doesn't guarantee we will make a further progress. The new helper is then used if compaction_withdrawn() feedback was provided so we do not retry if there is no outlook for a further progress. !costly requests shouldn't be affected much - e.g. order-2 pages would require to have at least 64kB on the reclaimable LRUs while order-9 would need at least 32M which should be enough to not lock up. [vbabka@suse.cz: fix classzone_idx vs. high_zoneidx usage in compaction_zonelist_suitable] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix it for Mel's mm-page_alloc-remove-field-from-alloc_context.patch] Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocationMichal Hocko
PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER retry logic is mostly handled inside should_reclaim_retry currently where we decide to not retry after at least order worth of pages were reclaimed or the watermark check for at least one zone would succeed after reclaiming all pages if the reclaim hasn't made any progress. Compaction feedback is mostly ignored and we just try to make sure that the compaction did at least something before giving up. The first condition was added by a41f24ea9fd6 ("page allocator: smarter retry of costly-order allocations) and it assumed that lumpy reclaim could have created a page of the sufficient order. Lumpy reclaim, has been removed quite some time ago so the assumption doesn't hold anymore. Remove the check for the number of reclaimed pages and rely on the compaction feedback solely. should_reclaim_retry now only makes sure that we keep retrying reclaim for high order pages only if they are hidden by watermaks so order-0 reclaim makes really sense. should_compact_retry now keeps retrying even for the costly allocations. The number of retries is reduced wrt. !costly requests because they are less important and harder to grant and so their pressure shouldn't cause contention for other requests or cause an over reclaim. We also do not reset no_progress_loops for costly request to make sure we do not keep reclaiming too agressively. This has been tested by running a process which fragments memory: - compact memory - mmap large portion of the memory (1920M on 2GRAM machine with 2G of swapspace) - MADV_DONTNEED single page in PAGE_SIZE*((1UL<<MAX_ORDER)-1) steps until certain amount of memory is freed (250M in my test) and reduce the step to (step / 2) + 1 after reaching the end of the mapping - then run a script which populates the page cache 2G (MemTotal) from /dev/zero to a new file And then tries to allocate nr_hugepages=$(awk '/MemAvailable/{printf "%d\n", $2/(2*1024)}' /proc/meminfo) huge pages. root@test1:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory;echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory; ./fragment-mem-and-run /root/alloc_hugepages.sh 1920M 250M Node 0, zone DMA 31 28 31 10 2 0 2 1 2 3 1 Node 0, zone DMA32 437 319 171 50 28 25 20 16 16 14 437 * This is the /proc/buddyinfo after the compaction Done fragmenting. size=2013265920 freed=262144000 Node 0, zone DMA 165 48 3 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 Node 0, zone DMA32 35109 14575 185 51 41 12 6 0 0 0 0 * /proc/buddyinfo after memory got fragmented Executing "/root/alloc_hugepages.sh" Eating some pagecache 508623+0 records in 508623+0 records out 2083319808 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 11.7292 s, 178 MB/s Node 0, zone DMA 3 5 3 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 Node 0, zone DMA32 111 344 153 20 24 10 3 0 0 0 0 * /proc/buddyinfo after page cache got eaten Trying to allocate 129 129 * 129 hugepages requested and all of them granted. Node 0, zone DMA 3 5 3 1 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 Node 0, zone DMA32 127 97 30 99 11 6 2 1 4 0 0 * /proc/buddyinfo after hugetlb allocation. 10 runs will behave as follows: Trying to allocate 130 130 -- Trying to allocate 129 129 -- Trying to allocate 128 128 -- Trying to allocate 129 129 -- Trying to allocate 128 128 -- Trying to allocate 129 129 -- Trying to allocate 132 132 -- Trying to allocate 129 129 -- Trying to allocate 128 128 -- Trying to allocate 129 129 So basically 100% success for all 10 attempts. Without the patch numbers looked much worse: Trying to allocate 128 12 -- Trying to allocate 129 14 -- Trying to allocate 129 7 -- Trying to allocate 129 16 -- Trying to allocate 129 30 -- Trying to allocate 129 38 -- Trying to allocate 129 19 -- Trying to allocate 129 37 -- Trying to allocate 129 28 -- Trying to allocate 129 37 Just for completness the base kernel without oom detection rework looks as follows: Trying to allocate 127 30 -- Trying to allocate 129 12 -- Trying to allocate 129 52 -- Trying to allocate 128 32 -- Trying to allocate 129 12 -- Trying to allocate 129 10 -- Trying to allocate 129 32 -- Trying to allocate 128 14 -- Trying to allocate 128 16 -- Trying to allocate 129 8 As we can see the success rate is much more volatile and smaller without this patch. So the patch not only makes the retry logic for costly requests more sensible the success rate is even higher. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some moreMichal Hocko
should_reclaim_retry will give up retries for higher order allocations if none of the eligible zones has any requested or higher order pages available even if we pass the watermak check for order-0. This is done because there is no guarantee that the reclaimable and currently free pages will form the required order. This can, however, lead to situations where the high-order request (e.g. order-2 required for the stack allocation during fork) will trigger OOM too early - e.g. after the first reclaim/compaction round. Such a system would have to be highly fragmented and there is no guarantee further reclaim/compaction attempts would help but at least make sure that the compaction was active before we go OOM and keep retrying even if should_reclaim_retry tells us to oom if - the last compaction round backed off or - we haven't completed at least MAX_COMPACT_RETRIES active compaction rounds. The first rule ensures that the very last attempt for compaction was not ignored while the second guarantees that the compaction has done some work. Multiple retries might be needed to prevent occasional pigggy backing of other contexts to steal the compacted pages before the current context manages to retry to allocate them. compaction_failed() is taken as a final word from the compaction that the retry doesn't make much sense. We have to be careful though because the first compaction round is MIGRATE_ASYNC which is rather weak as it ignores pages under writeback and gives up too easily in other situations. We therefore have to make sure that MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT mode has been used before we give up. With this logic in place we do not have to increase the migration mode unconditionally and rather do it only if the compaction failed for the weaker mode. A nice side effect is that the stronger migration mode is used only when really needed so this has a potential of smaller latencies in some cases. Please note that the compaction doesn't tell us much about how successful it was when returning compaction_made_progress so we just have to blindly trust that another retry is worthwhile and cap the number to something reasonable to guarantee a convergence. If the given number of successful retries is not sufficient for a reasonable workloads we should focus on the collected compaction tracepoints data and try to address the issue in the compaction code. If this is not feasible we can increase the retries limit. [mhocko@suse.com: fix warning] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160512061636.GA4200@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pagesMichal Hocko
wait_iff_congested has been used to throttle allocator before it retried another round of direct reclaim to allow the writeback to make some progress and prevent reclaim from looping over dirty/writeback pages without making any progress. We used to do congestion_wait before commit 0e093d99763e ("writeback: do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone") but that led to undesirable stalls and sleeping for the full timeout even when the BDI wasn't congested. Hence wait_iff_congested was used instead. But it seems that even wait_iff_congested doesn't work as expected. We might have a small file LRU list with all pages dirty/writeback and yet the bdi is not congested so this is just a cond_resched in the end and can end up triggering pre mature OOM. This patch replaces the unconditional wait_iff_congested by congestion_wait which is executed only if we _know_ that the last round of direct reclaim didn't make any progress and dirty+writeback pages are more than a half of the reclaimable pages on the zone which might be usable for our target allocation. This shouldn't reintroduce stalls fixed by 0e093d99763e because congestion_wait is called only when we are getting hopeless when sleeping is a better choice than OOM with many pages under IO. We have to preserve logic introduced by commit 373ccbe59270 ("mm, vmstat: allow WQ concurrency to discover memory reclaim doesn't make any progress") into the __alloc_pages_slowpath now that wait_iff_congested is not used anymore. As the only remaining user of wait_iff_congested is shrink_inactive_list we can remove the WQ specific short sleep from wait_iff_congested because the sleep is needed to be done only once in the allocation retry cycle. [mhocko@suse.com: high_zoneidx->ac_classzone_idx to evaluate memory reserves properly] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, oom: rework oom detectionMichal Hocko
__alloc_pages_slowpath has traditionally relied on the direct reclaim and did_some_progress as an indicator that it makes sense to retry allocation rather than declaring OOM. shrink_zones had to rely on zone_reclaimable if shrink_zone didn't make any progress to prevent from a premature OOM killer invocation - the LRU might be full of dirty or writeback pages and direct reclaim cannot clean those up. zone_reclaimable allows to rescan the reclaimable lists several times and restart if a page is freed. This is really subtle behavior and it might lead to a livelock when a single freed page keeps allocator looping but the current task will not be able to allocate that single page. OOM killer would be more appropriate than looping without any progress for unbounded amount of time. This patch changes OOM detection logic and pulls it out from shrink_zone which is too low to be appropriate for any high level decisions such as OOM which is per zonelist property. It is __alloc_pages_slowpath which knows how many attempts have been done and what was the progress so far therefore it is more appropriate to implement this logic. The new heuristic is implemented in should_reclaim_retry helper called from __alloc_pages_slowpath. It tries to be more deterministic and easier to follow. It builds on an assumption that retrying makes sense only if the currently reclaimable memory + free pages would allow the current allocation request to succeed (as per __zone_watermark_ok) at least for one zone in the usable zonelist. This alone wouldn't be sufficient, though, because the writeback might get stuck and reclaimable pages might be pinned for a really long time or even depend on the current allocation context. Therefore there is a backoff mechanism implemented which reduces the reclaim target after each reclaim round without any progress. This means that we should eventually converge to only NR_FREE_PAGES as the target and fail on the wmark check and proceed to OOM. The backoff is simple and linear with 1/16 of the reclaimable pages for each round without any progress. We are optimistic and reset counter for successful reclaim rounds. Costly high order pages mostly preserve their semantic and those without __GFP_REPEAT fail right away while those which have the flag set will back off after the amount of reclaimable pages reaches equivalent of the requested order. The only difference is that if there was no progress during the reclaim we rely on zone watermark check. This is more logical thing to do than previous 1<<order attempts which were a result of zone_reclaimable faking the progress. [vdavydov@virtuozzo.com: check classzone_idx for shrink_zone] [hannes@cmpxchg.org: separate the heuristic into should_reclaim_retry] [rientjes@google.com: use zone_page_state_snapshot for NR_FREE_PAGES] [rientjes@google.com: shrink_zones doesn't need to return anything] Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, compaction: simplify __alloc_pages_direct_compact feedback interfaceMichal Hocko
__alloc_pages_direct_compact communicates potential back off by two variables: - deferred_compaction tells that the compaction returned COMPACT_DEFERRED - contended_compaction is set when there is a contention on zone->lock resp. zone->lru_lock locks __alloc_pages_slowpath then backs of for THP allocation requests to prevent from long stalls. This is rather messy and it would be much cleaner to return a single compact result value and hide all the nasty details into __alloc_pages_direct_compact. This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enumMichal Hocko
Compaction code is doing weird dances between COMPACT_FOO -> int -> unsigned long But there doesn't seem to be any reason for that. All functions which return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value so it really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear that no other values are expected. This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-20mm: vmscan: reduce size of inactive file listRik van Riel
The inactive file list should still be large enough to contain readahead windows and freshly written file data, but it no longer is the only source for detecting multiple accesses to file pages. The workingset refault measurement code causes recently evicted file pages that get accessed again after a shorter interval to be promoted directly to the active list. With that mechanism in place, we can afford to (on a larger system) dedicate more memory to the active file list, so we can actually cache more of the frequently used file pages in memory, and not have them pushed out by streaming writes, once-used streaming file reads, etc. This can help things like database workloads, where only half the page cache can currently be used to cache the database working set. This patch automatically increases that fraction on larger systems, using the same ratio that has already been used for anonymous memory. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: cgroup-awareness] Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: restore the original nodemask if the fast path allocation failedMel Gorman
The page allocator fast path uses either the requested nodemask or cpuset_current_mems_allowed if cpusets are enabled. If the allocation context allows watermarks to be ignored then it can also ignore memory policies. However, on entering the allocator slowpath the nodemask may still be cpuset_current_mems_allowed and the policies are enforced. This patch resets the nodemask appropriately before entering the slowpath. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160504143628.GU2858@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: uninline the bad page part of check_new_page()Vlastimil Babka
Bad pages should be rare so the code handling them doesn't need to be inline for performance reasons. Put it to separate function which returns void. This also assumes that the initial page_expected_state() result will match the result of the thorough check, i.e. the page doesn't become "good" in the meanwhile. This matches the same expectations already in place in free_pages_check(). !DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter: add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 134/-274 (-140) function old new delta check_new_page_bad - 134 +134 get_page_from_freelist 3468 3194 -274 Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: don't duplicate code in free_pcp_prepareMel Gorman
The new free_pcp_prepare() function shares a lot of code with free_pages_prepare(), which makes this a maintenance risk when some future patch modifies only one of them. We should be able to achieve the same effect (skipping free_pages_check() from !DEBUG_VM configs) by adding a parameter to free_pages_prepare() and making it inline, so the checks (and the order != 0 parts) are eliminated from the call from free_pcp_prepare(). !DEBUG_VM: bloat-o-meter reports no difference, as my gcc was already inlining free_pages_prepare() and the elimination seems to work as expected DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter: add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 1035/-778 (257) function old new delta __free_pages_ok 297 1060 +763 free_hot_cold_page 480 752 +272 free_pages_prepare 778 - -778 Here inlining didn't occur before, and added some code, but it's ok for a debug option. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of pages allocated from the PCPMel Gorman
Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity. This catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is expensive. This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages only when the PCP lists are being refilled. All compound pages are checked. This potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP lists are never emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be missed. Full checking requires DEBUG_VM. With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page allocator microbenchmark is 4.6.0-rc3 4.6.0-rc3 inline-v3r6 deferalloc-v3r7 Min alloc-odr0-1 344.00 ( 0.00%) 317.00 ( 7.85%) Min alloc-odr0-2 248.00 ( 0.00%) 231.00 ( 6.85%) Min alloc-odr0-4 209.00 ( 0.00%) 192.00 ( 8.13%) Min alloc-odr0-8 181.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( 8.29%) Min alloc-odr0-16 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%) Min alloc-odr0-32 161.00 ( 0.00%) 148.00 ( 8.07%) Min alloc-odr0-64 158.00 ( 0.00%) 145.00 ( 8.23%) Min alloc-odr0-128 156.00 ( 0.00%) 143.00 ( 8.33%) Min alloc-odr0-256 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%) Min alloc-odr0-512 178.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 6.18%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 186.00 ( 0.00%) 174.00 ( 6.45%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 192.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 6.25%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 198.00 ( 0.00%) 184.00 ( 7.07%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 200.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.00%) Min alloc-odr0-16384 201.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.47%) Min free-odr0-1 189.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 4.76%) Min free-odr0-2 132.00 ( 0.00%) 126.00 ( 4.55%) Min free-odr0-4 104.00 ( 0.00%) 99.00 ( 4.81%) Min free-odr0-8 90.00 ( 0.00%) 85.00 ( 5.56%) Min free-odr0-16 84.00 ( 0.00%) 80.00 ( 4.76%) Min free-odr0-32 80.00 ( 0.00%) 76.00 ( 5.00%) Min free-odr0-64 78.00 ( 0.00%) 74.00 ( 5.13%) Min free-odr0-128 77.00 ( 0.00%) 73.00 ( 5.19%) Min free-odr0-256 94.00 ( 0.00%) 91.00 ( 3.19%) Min free-odr0-512 108.00 ( 0.00%) 112.00 ( -3.70%) Min free-odr0-1024 115.00 ( 0.00%) 118.00 ( -2.61%) Min free-odr0-2048 120.00 ( 0.00%) 125.00 ( -4.17%) Min free-odr0-4096 123.00 ( 0.00%) 129.00 ( -4.88%) Min free-odr0-8192 126.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( -3.17%) Min free-odr0-16384 126.00 ( 0.00%) 131.00 ( -3.97%) Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no longer necessarily cache-hot. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of freed pages until a PCP drainMel Gorman
Every page free checks a number of page fields for validity. This catches premature frees and corruptions but it is also expensive. This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages at the time they are drained from the PCP list. This will trigger the bug but the site that freed the corrupt page will be lost. To get the full context, a kernel rebuild with DEBUG_VM is necessary. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19cpuset: use static key better and convert to new APIVlastimil Babka
An important function for cpusets is cpuset_node_allowed(), which optimizes on the fact if there's a single root CPU set, it must be trivially allowed. But the check "nr_cpusets() <= 1" doesn't use the cpusets_enabled_key static key the right way where static keys eliminate branching overhead with jump labels. This patch converts it so that static key is used properly. It's also switched to the new static key API and the checking functions are converted to return bool instead of int. We also provide a new variant __cpuset_zone_allowed() which expects that the static key check was already done and they key was enabled. This is needed for get_page_from_freelist() where we want to also avoid the relatively slower check when ALLOC_CPUSET is not set in alloc_flags. The impact on the page allocator microbenchmark is less than expected but the cleanup in itself is worthwhile. 4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2 multcheck-v1r20 cpuset-v1r20 Min alloc-odr0-1 348.00 ( 0.00%) 348.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-2 254.00 ( 0.00%) 254.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-4 213.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-8 186.00 ( 0.00%) 183.00 ( 1.61%) Min alloc-odr0-16 173.00 ( 0.00%) 171.00 ( 1.16%) Min alloc-odr0-32 166.00 ( 0.00%) 163.00 ( 1.81%) Min alloc-odr0-64 162.00 ( 0.00%) 159.00 ( 1.85%) Min alloc-odr0-128 160.00 ( 0.00%) 157.00 ( 1.88%) Min alloc-odr0-256 169.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( 1.78%) Min alloc-odr0-512 180.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 188.00 ( 0.00%) 187.00 ( 0.53%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 194.00 ( 0.00%) 193.00 ( 0.52%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 199.00 ( 0.00%) 198.00 ( 0.50%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 202.00 ( 0.00%) 201.00 ( 0.50%) Min alloc-odr0-16384 203.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 0.49%) Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: inline pageblock lookup in page free fast pathsMel Gorman
The function call overhead of get_pfnblock_flags_mask() is measurable in the page free paths. This patch uses an inlined version that is faster. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary variable from free_pcppages_bulkMel Gorman
The original count is never reused so it can be removed. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: pull out side effects from free_pages_checkMel Gorman
Check without side-effects should be easier to maintain. It also removes the duplicated cpupid and flags reset done in !DEBUG_VM variant of both free_pcp_prepare() and then bulkfree_pcp_prepare(). Finally, it enables the next patch. It shouldn't result in new branches, thanks to inlining of the check. !DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter: add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-27 (-27) function old new delta __free_pages_ok 748 739 -9 free_pcppages_bulk 1403 1385 -18 DEBUG_VM: add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-28 (-28) function old new delta free_pages_prepare 806 778 -28 This is also slightly faster because cpupid information is not set on tail pages so we can avoid resets there. Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: un-inline the bad part of free_pages_checkMel Gorman
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> !DEBUG_VM size and bloat-o-meter: add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-370 (-246) function old new delta free_pages_check_bad - 124 +124 free_pcppages_bulk 1288 1171 -117 __free_pages_ok 948 695 -253 DEBUG_VM: add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-214 (-90) function old new delta free_pages_check_bad - 124 +124 free_pages_prepare 1112 898 -214 [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace] Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: check multiple page fields with a single branchMel Gorman
Every page allocated or freed is checked for sanity to avoid corruptions that are difficult to detect later. A bad page could be due to a number of fields. Instead of using multiple branches, this patch combines multiple fields into a single branch. A detailed check is only necessary if that check fails. 4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2 initonce-v1r20 multcheck-v1r20 Min alloc-odr0-1 359.00 ( 0.00%) 348.00 ( 3.06%) Min alloc-odr0-2 260.00 ( 0.00%) 254.00 ( 2.31%) Min alloc-odr0-4 214.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.47%) Min alloc-odr0-8 186.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-16 173.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-32 165.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( -0.61%) Min alloc-odr0-64 162.00 ( 0.00%) 162.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-128 161.00 ( 0.00%) 160.00 ( 0.62%) Min alloc-odr0-256 170.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 0.59%) Min alloc-odr0-512 181.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 0.55%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 190.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 1.05%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 196.00 ( 0.00%) 194.00 ( 1.02%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 202.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.49%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 205.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 1.46%) Min alloc-odr0-16384 205.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 0.98%) Again, the benefit is marginal but avoiding excessive branches is important. Ideally the paths would not have to check these conditions at all but regrettably abandoning the tests would make use-after-free bugs much harder to detect. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: remove field from alloc_contextMel Gorman
The classzone_idx can be inferred from preferred_zoneref so remove the unnecessary field and save stack space. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twiceMel Gorman
The allocator fast path looks up the first usable zone in a zonelist and then get_page_from_freelist does the same job in the zonelist iterator. This patch preserves the necessary information. 4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2 fastmark-v1r20 initonce-v1r20 Min alloc-odr0-1 364.00 ( 0.00%) 359.00 ( 1.37%) Min alloc-odr0-2 262.00 ( 0.00%) 260.00 ( 0.76%) Min alloc-odr0-4 214.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-8 186.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-16 173.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-32 165.00 ( 0.00%) 165.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-64 161.00 ( 0.00%) 162.00 ( -0.62%) Min alloc-odr0-128 159.00 ( 0.00%) 161.00 ( -1.26%) Min alloc-odr0-256 168.00 ( 0.00%) 170.00 ( -1.19%) Min alloc-odr0-512 180.00 ( 0.00%) 181.00 ( -0.56%) Min alloc-odr0-1024 190.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-2048 196.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-4096 202.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 0.00%) Min alloc-odr0-8192 206.00 ( 0.0