summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/memory_hotplug.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-02-21mm, memory_hotplug: fix off-by-one in is_pageblock_removableMichal Hocko
Rong Chen has reported the following boot crash: PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-00149-gefad4e4 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80 Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 da <48> 8b 53 08 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48 RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 000000000000000a RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff88801e5c0000 RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 0000000001b64d13 R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88801e640000 R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 Call Trace: __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0 is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0 removable_show+0x87/0xa0 dev_attr_show+0x25/0x60 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xba/0x110 seq_read+0x196/0x3f0 __vfs_read+0x34/0x180 vfs_read+0xa0/0x150 ksys_read+0x44/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0x4a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe and bisected it down to commit efad4e475c31 ("mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone"). The reason for the crash is that the mapping is garbage for poisoned (uninitialized) page. This shouldn't happen as all pages in the zone's boundary should be initialized. Later debugging revealed that the actual problem is an off-by-one when evaluating the end_page. 'start_pfn + nr_pages' resp 'zone_end_pfn' refers to a pfn after the range and as such it might belong to a differen memory section. This along with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM then makes the loop condition completely bogus because a pointer arithmetic doesn't work for pages from two different sections in that memory model. Fix the issue by reworking is_pageblock_removable to be pfn based and only use struct page where necessary. This makes the code slightly easier to follow and we will remove the problematic pointer arithmetic completely. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190218181544.14616-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: efad4e475c31 ("mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01mm, memory_hotplug: __offline_pages fix wrong lockingMichal Hocko
Jan has noticed that we do double unlock on some failure paths when offlining a page range. This is indeed the case when test_pages_in_a_zone respp. start_isolate_page_range fail. This was an omission when forward porting the debugging patch from an older kernel. Fix the issue by dropping mem_hotplug_done from the failure condition and keeping the single unlock in the catch all failure path. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190115120307.22768-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: 7960509329c2 ("mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Tested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01mm,memory_hotplug: fix scan_movable_pages() for gigantic hugepagesOscar Salvador
This is the same sort of error we saw in commit 17e2e7d7e1b8 ("mm, page_alloc: fix has_unmovable_pages for HugePages"). Gigantic hugepages cross several memblocks, so it can be that the page we get in scan_movable_pages() is a page-tail belonging to a 1G-hugepage. If that happens, page_hstate()->size_to_hstate() will return NULL, and we will blow up in hugepage_migration_supported(). The splat is as follows: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 1350 Comm: bash Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc1-mm1-1-default+ #27 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__offline_pages+0x6ae/0x900 Call Trace: memory_subsys_offline+0x42/0x60 device_offline+0x80/0xa0 state_store+0xab/0xc0 kernfs_fop_write+0x102/0x180 __vfs_write+0x26/0x190 vfs_write+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_write+0x42/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Modules linked in: af_packet(E) xt_tcpudp(E) ipt_REJECT(E) xt_conntrack(E) nf_conntrack(E) nf_defrag_ipv4(E) ip_set(E) nfnetlink(E) ebtable_nat(E) ebtable_broute(E) bridge(E) stp(E) llc(E) iptable_mangle(E) iptable_raw(E) iptable_security(E) ebtable_filter(E) ebtables(E) iptable_filter(E) ip_tables(E) x_tables(E) kvm_intel(E) kvm(E) irqbypass(E) crct10dif_pclmul(E) crc32_pclmul(E) ghash_clmulni_intel(E) bochs_drm(E) ttm(E) aesni_intel(E) drm_kms_helper(E) aes_x86_64(E) crypto_simd(E) cryptd(E) glue_helper(E) drm(E) virtio_net(E) syscopyarea(E) sysfillrect(E) net_failover(E) sysimgblt(E) pcspkr(E) failover(E) i2c_piix4(E) fb_sys_fops(E) parport_pc(E) parport(E) button(E) btrfs(E) libcrc32c(E) xor(E) zstd_decompress(E) zstd_compress(E) xxhash(E) raid6_pq(E) sd_mod(E) ata_generic(E) ata_piix(E) ahci(E) libahci(E) libata(E) crc32c_intel(E) serio_raw(E) virtio_pci(E) virtio_ring(E) virtio(E) sg(E) scsi_mod(E) autofs4(E) [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix brace layout, per David. Reduce indentation] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190122154407.18417-1-osalvador@suse.de Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01mm, memory_hotplug: test_pages_in_a_zone do not pass the end of zoneMikhail Zaslonko
If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the mapping of such a section is only partly initialized. This may lead to VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct pages access from test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by memory_hotplug sysfs handlers. Here are the the panic examples: CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y kernel parameter mem=2050M -------------------------- page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) Call Trace: test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160 show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190 dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148 seq_read+0x204/0x480 __vfs_read+0x32/0x178 vfs_read+0x82/0x138 ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0 system_call+0xdc/0x2d8 Last Breaking-Event-Address: test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops Fix this by checking whether the pfn to check is within the zone. [mhocko@suse.com: separated this change from http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128144506.15603-3-mhocko@kernel.org [mhocko@suse.com: separated this change from http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com] Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zoneMichal Hocko
Patch series "mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts", v2. Mikhail Zaslonko has posted fixes for the two bugs quite some time ago [1]. I have pushed back on those fixes because I believed that it is much better to plug the problem at the initialization time rather than play whack-a-mole all over the hotplug code and find all the places which expect the full memory section to be initialized. We have ended up with commit 2830bf6f05fb ("mm, memory_hotplug: initialize struct pages for the full memory section") merged and cause a regression [2][3]. The reason is that there might be memory layouts when two NUMA nodes share the same memory section so the merged fix is simply incorrect. In order to plug this hole we really have to be zone range aware in those handlers. I have split up the original patch into two. One is unchanged (patch 2) and I took a different approach for `removable' crash. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666948 [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz This patch (of 2): Mikhail has reported the following VM_BUG_ON triggered when reading sysfs removable state of a memory block: page:000003d08300c000 is uninitialized and poisoned page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) Call Trace: is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190 show_mem_removable+0x9a/0xd8 dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148 seq_read+0x204/0x480 __vfs_read+0x32/0x178 vfs_read+0x82/0x138 ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0 system_call+0xdc/0x2d8 Last Breaking-Event-Address: is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops The reason is that the memory block spans the zone boundary and we are stumbling over an unitialized struct page. Fix this by enforcing zone range in is_mem_section_removable so that we never run away from a zone. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128144506.15603-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Debugged-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-02-01mm, memory_hotplug: don't bail out in do_migrate_range() prematurelyOscar Salvador
do_migrate_range() takes a memory range and tries to isolate the pages to put them into a list. This list will be later on used in migrate_pages() to know the pages we need to migrate. Currently, if we fail to isolate a single page, we put all already isolated pages back to their LRU and we bail out from the function. This is quite suboptimal, as this will force us to start over again because scan_movable_pages will give us the same range. If there is no chance that we can isolate that page, we will loop here forever. Issue debugged in [1] has proved that. During the debugging of that issue, it was noticed that if do_migrate_ranges() fails to isolate a single page, we will just discard the work we have done so far and bail out, which means that scan_movable_pages() will find again the same set of pages. Instead, we can just skip the error, keep isolating as much pages as possible and then proceed with the call to migrate_pages(). This will allow us to do as much work as possible at once. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/6/324 Michal said: : I still think that this doesn't give us a whole picture. Looping for : ever is a bug. Failing the isolation is quite possible and it should : be a ephemeral condition (e.g. a race with freeing the page or : somebody else isolating the page for whatever reason). And here comes : the disadvantage of the current implementation. We simply throw : everything on the floor just because of a ephemeral condition. The : racy page_count check is quite dubious to prevent from that. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211135312.27034-1-osalvador@suse.de Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offliningMichal Hocko
Memory migration might fail during offlining and we keep retrying in that case. This is currently obfuscated by goto retry loop. The code is hard to follow and as a result it is even suboptimal becase each retry round scans the full range from start_pfn even though we have successfully scanned/migrated [start_pfn, pfn] range already. This is all only because check_pages_isolated failure has to rescan the full range again. De-obfuscate the migration retry loop by promoting it to a real for loop. In fact remove the goto altogether by making it a proper double loop (yeah, gotos are nasty in this specific case). In the end we will get a slightly more optimal code which is better readable. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: reflow comments to 80 cols] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-3-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full pfn rangeMichal Hocko
Patch series "few memory offlining enhancements". I have been chasing memory offlining not making progress recently. On the way I have noticed few weird decisions in the code. The migration itself is restricted without a reasonable justification and the retry loop around the migration is quite messy. This is addressed by patch 1 and patch 2. Patch 3 is targeting on the faultaround code which has been a hot candidate for the initial issue reported upstream [2] and that I am debugging internally. It turned out to be not the main contributor in the end but I believe we should address it regardless. See the patch description for more details. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181120134323.13007-1-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181114070909.GB2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv This patch (of 3): do_migrate_range has been limiting the number of pages to migrate to 256 for some reason which is not documented. Even if the limit made some sense back then when it was introduced it doesn't really serve a good purpose these days. If the range contains huge pages then we break out of the loop too early and go through LRU and pcp caches draining and scan_movable_pages is quite suboptimal. The only reason to limit the number of pages I can think of is to reduce the potential time to react on the fatal signal. But even then the number of pages is a questionable metric because even a single page migration might block in a non-killable state (e.g. __unmap_and_move). Remove the limit and offline the full requested range (this is one memblock worth of pages with the current code). Should we ever get a report that offlining takes too long to react on fatal signal then we should rather fix the core migration to use killable waits and bailout on a signal. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-1-mhocko@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlinedMichal Hocko
We have received a bug report that an injected MCE about faulty memory prevents memory offline to succeed on 4.4 base kernel. The underlying reason was that the HWPoison page has an elevated reference count and the migration keeps failing. There are two problems with that. First of all it is dubious to migrate the poisoned page because we know that accessing that memory is possible to fail. Secondly it doesn't make any sense to migrate a potentially broken content and preserve the memory corruption over to a new location. Oscar has found out that 4.4 and the current upstream kernels behave slightly differently with his simply testcase === int main(void) { int ret; int i; int fd; char *array = malloc(4096); char *array_locked = malloc(4096); fd = open("/tmp/data", O_RDONLY); read(fd, array, 4095); for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++) array_locked[i] = 'd'; ret = mlock((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), sizeof(array_locked)); if (ret) perror("mlock"); sleep (20); ret = madvise((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), 4096, MADV_HWPOISON); if (ret) perror("madvise"); for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++) array_locked[i] = 'd'; return 0; } === + offline this memory. In 4.4 kernels he saw the hwpoisoned page to be returned back to the LRU list kernel: [<ffffffff81019ac9>] dump_trace+0x59/0x340 kernel: [<ffffffff81019e9a>] show_stack_log_lvl+0xea/0x170 kernel: [<ffffffff8101ac71>] show_stack+0x21/0x40 kernel: [<ffffffff8132bb90>] dump_stack+0x5c/0x7c kernel: [<ffffffff810815a1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xb0 kernel: [<ffffffff811a275c>] __pagevec_lru_add_fn+0x14c/0x160 kernel: [<ffffffff811a2eed>] pagevec_lru_move_fn+0xad/0x100 kernel: [<ffffffff811a334c>] __lru_cache_add+0x6c/0xb0 kernel: [<ffffffff81195236>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x46/0x70 kernel: [<ffffffffa02b4373>] extent_readpages+0xc3/0x1a0 [btrfs] kernel: [<ffffffff811a16d7>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x177/0x200 kernel: [<ffffffff811a18c8>] ondemand_readahead+0x168/0x2a0 kernel: [<ffffffff8119673f>] generic_file_read_iter+0x41f/0x660 kernel: [<ffffffff8120e50d>] __vfs_read+0xcd/0x140 kernel: [<ffffffff8120e9ea>] vfs_read+0x7a/0x120 kernel: [<ffffffff8121404b>] kernel_read+0x3b/0x50 kernel: [<ffffffff81215c80>] do_execveat_common.isra.29+0x490/0x6f0 kernel: [<ffffffff81215f08>] do_execve+0x28/0x30 kernel: [<ffffffff81095ddb>] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0xfb/0x130 kernel: [<ffffffff8161c045>] ret_from_fork+0x55/0x80 And that latter confuses the hotremove path because an LRU page is attempted to be migrated and that fails due to an elevated reference count. It is quite possible that the reuse of the HWPoisoned page is some kind of fixed race condition but I am not really sure about that. With the upstream kernel the failure is slightly different. The page doesn't seem to have LRU bit set but isolate_movable_page simply fails and do_migrate_range simply puts all the isolated pages back to LRU and therefore no progress is made and scan_movable_pages finds same set of pages over and over again. Fix both cases by explicitly checking HWPoisoned pages before we even try to get reference on the page, try to unmap it if it is still mapped. As explained by Naoya: : Hwpoison code never unmapped those for no big reason because : Ksm pages never dominate memory, so we simply didn't have strong : motivation to save the pages. Also put WARN_ON(PageLRU) in case there is a race and we can hit LRU HWPoison pages which shouldn't happen but I couldn't convince myself about that. Naoya has noted the following: : Theoretically no such gurantee, because try_to_unmap() doesn't have a : guarantee of success and then memory_failure() returns immediately : when hwpoison_user_mappings fails. : Or the following code (comes after hwpoison_user_mappings block) also impli= : es : that the target page can still have PageLRU flag. : : /* : * Torn down by someone else? : */ : if (PageLRU(p) && !PageSwapCache(p) && p->mapping =3D=3D NULL) { : action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_TRUNCATED_LRU, MF_IGNORED); : res =3D -EBUSY; : goto out; : } : : So I think it's OK to keep "if (WARN_ON(PageLRU(page)))" block in : current version of your patch. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181206120135.14079-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Debugged-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Tested-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protectionWei Yang
During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case this zone is empty. Currently the online_pages phase is protected by the global locks (device_device_hotplug_lock and mem_hotplug_lock), which ensures there is no contention during the update of nr_zones. These global locks introduces scalability issues (especially the second one), which slow down code relying on get_online_mems(). This is also a preparation for not having to rely on get_online_mems() but instead some more fine grained locks. The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones) and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation of node_size_lock to include the protection of nr_zones. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203205016.14123-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, sparse: pass nid instead of pgdat to sparse_add_one_section()Wei Yang
Since the information needed in sparse_add_one_section() is node id to allocate proper memory, it is not necessary to pass its pgdat. This patch changes the prototype of sparse_add_one_section() to pass node id directly. This is intended to reduce misleading that sparse_add_one_section() would touch pgdat. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181204085657.20472-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: add nid parameter to arch_remove_memoryOscar Salvador
Patch series "Do not touch pages in hot-remove path", v2. This patchset aims for two things: 1) A better definition about offline and hot-remove stage 2) Solving bugs where we can access non-initialized pages during hot-remove operations [2] [3]. This is achieved by moving all page/zone handling to the offline stage, so we do not need to access pages when hot-removing memory. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10691415/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10547445/ [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg161316.html This patch (of 5): This is a preparation for the following-up patches. The idea of passing the nid is that it will allow us to get rid of the zone parameter afterwards. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127162005.15833-2-osalvador@suse.de Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm/memory_hotplug: drop "online" parameter from add_memory_resource()David Hildenbrand
Userspace should always be in charge of how to online memory and if memory should be onlined automatically in the kernel. Let's drop the parameter to overwrite this - XEN passes memhp_auto_online, just like add_memory(), so we can directly use that instead internally. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123123740.27652-1-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: do not clear numa_node association after hot_removeMichal Hocko
Per-cpu numa_node provides a default node for each possible cpu. The association gets initialized during the boot when the architecture specific code explores cpu->NUMA affinity. When the whole NUMA node is removed though we are clearing this association try_offline_node check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node unmap_cpu_on_node numa_clear_node numa_set_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE) This means that whoever calls cpu_to_node for a cpu associated with such a node will get NUMA_NO_NODE. This is problematic for two reasons. First it is fragile because __alloc_pages_node would simply blow up on an out-of-bound access. We have encountered this when loading kvm module BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000000021c0 IP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70 PGD 800000ffe853e067 PUD 7336bbc067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [...] CPU: 88 PID: 1223749 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 4.4.156-94.64-default #1 RIP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70 RSP: 0018:ffff887354493b40 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000021c0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00000000014000c0 RBP: 00000000014000c0 R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff88fffc89e790 R11: 0000000000014000 R12: 0000000000000101 R13: ffffffffa0772cd4 R14: ffffffffa0769ac0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fdf2f2f1700(0000) GS:ffff88fffc880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000021c0 CR3: 00000077205ee000 CR4: 0000000000360670 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: alloc_vmcs_cpu+0x3d/0x90 [kvm_intel] hardware_setup+0x781/0x849 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_hardware_setup+0x28/0x190 [kvm] kvm_init+0x7c/0x2d0 [kvm] vmx_init+0x1e/0x32c [kvm_intel] do_one_initcall+0xca/0x1f0 do_init_module+0x5a/0x1d7 load_module+0x1393/0x1c90 SYSC_finit_module+0x70/0xa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7 DWARF2 unwinder stuck at entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7 on an older kernel but the code is basically the same in the current Linus tree as well. alloc_vmcs_cpu could use alloc_pages_nodemask which would recognize NUMA_NO_NODE and use alloc_pages_node which would translate it to numa_mem_id but that is wrong as well because it would use a cpu affinity of the local CPU which might be quite far from the original node. It is also reasonable to expect that cpu_to_node will provide a sane value and there might be many more callers like that. The second problem is that __register_one_node relies on cpu_to_node to properly associate cpus back to the node when it is onlined. We do not want to lose that link as there is no arch independent way to get it from the early boot time AFAICS. Drop the whole check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node machinery and keep the association to fix both issues. The NODE_DATA(nid) is not deallocated so it will stay in place and if anybody wants to allocate from that node then a fallback node will be used. Thanks to Vlastimil Babka for his live system debugging skills that helped debugging the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108100413.966-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: e13fe8695c57 ("cpu-hotplug,memory-hotplug: clear cpu_to_node() when offlining the node") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Debugged-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reported-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memoryMichal Hocko
Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head) [ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600 [ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 [ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 [ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000() [ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 [ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator. The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above it seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are lacking much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA allocated page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA area but it is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output alone. Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an argument to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and turn it into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a mask. While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from is_pageblock_removable_nolock (sysfs removable file) is questionable to report the failure so drop it from there as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218092802.31429-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failuresMichal Hocko
There is only very limited information printed when the memory offlining fails: [ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff This tells us that the failure is triggered by the userspace intervention but it doesn't tell us much more about the underlying reason. It might be that the page migration failes repeatedly and the userspace timeout expires and send a signal or it might be some of the earlier steps (isolation, memory notifier) takes too long. If the migration failes then it would be really helpful to see which page that and its state. The same applies to the isolation phase. If we fail to isolate a page from the allocator then knowing the state of the page would be helpful as well. Dump the page state that fails to get isolated or migrated. This will tell us more about the failure and what to focus on during debugging. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add missing printk arg] [mhocko@suse.com: tweak dump_page() `reason' text] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-6-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failureMichal Hocko
The memory offlining failure reporting is inconsistent and insufficient. Some error paths simply do not report the failure to the log at all. When we do report there are no details about the reason of the failure and there are several of them which makes memory offlining failures hard to debug. Make sure that the memory offlining [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] failed message is printed for all failures and also provide a short textual reason for the failure e.g. [ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff this tells us that the offlining has failed because of a signal pending aka user intervention. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak messages a bit] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-5-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm, memory_hotplug: drop pointless block alignment checks from __offline_pagesMichal Hocko
This function is never called from a context which would provide misaligned pfn range so drop the pointless check. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-4-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-11-03memory_hotplug: cond_resched in __remove_pagesMichal Hocko
We have received a bug report that unbinding a large pmem (>1TB) can result in a soft lockup: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s! [ndctl:4365] [...] Supported: Yes CPU: 9 PID: 4365 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 4.12.14-94.40-default #1 SLE12-SP4 Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFD/S2600WFD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.00.0833.051120182255 05/11/2018 task: ffff9cce7d4410c0 task.stack: ffffbe9eb1bc4000 RIP: 0010:__put_page+0x62/0x80 Call Trace: devm_memremap_pages_release+0x152/0x260 release_nodes+0x18d/0x1d0 device_release_driver_internal+0x160/0x210 unbind_store+0xb3/0xe0 kernfs_fop_write+0x102/0x180 __vfs_write+0x26/0x150 vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 SyS_write+0x42/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x74/0x150 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 RIP: 0033:0x7fd13166b3d0 It has been reported on an older (4.12) kernel but the current upstream code doesn't cond_resched in the hot remove code at all and the given range to remove might be really large. Fix the issue by calling cond_resched once per memory section. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125840.23982-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-31mm/memory_hotplug: fix online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lockDavid Hildenbrand
There seem to be some problems as result of 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"), which tried to fix a possible lock inversion reported and discussed in [1] due to the two locks a) device_lock() b) mem_hotplug_lock While add_memory() first takes b), followed by a) during bus_probe_device(), onlining of memory from user space first took a), followed by b), exposing a possible deadlock. In [1], and it was decided to not make use of device_hotplug_lock, but rather to enforce a locking order. The problems I spotted related to this: 1. Memory block device attributes: While .state first calls mem_hotplug_begin() and the calls device_online() - which takes device_lock() - .online does no longer call mem_hotplug_begin(), so effectively calls online_pages() without mem_hotplug_lock. 2. device_online() should be called under device_hotplug_lock, however onlining memory during add_memory() does not take care of that. In addition, I think there is also something wrong about the locking in 3. arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c calls offline_pages() without locks. This was introduced after 30467e0b3be. And skimming over the code, I assume it could need some more care in regards to locking (e.g. device_online() called without device_hotplug_lock. This will be addressed in the following patches. Now that we hold the device_hotplug_lock when - adding memory (e.g. via add_memory()/add_memory_resource()) - removing memory (e.g. via remove_memory()) - device_online()/device_offline() We can move mem_hotplug_lock usage back into online_pages()/offline_pages(). Why is mem_hotplug_lock still needed? Essentially to make get_online_mems()/put_online_mems() be very fast (relying on device_hotplug_lock would be very slow), and to serialize against addition of memory that does not create memory block devices (hmm). [1] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/ driverdev-devel/ 2015-February/065324.html This patch is partly based on a patch by Vitaly Kuznetsov. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-4-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-31mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lockDavid Hildenbrand
add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however is aleady called under the lock from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar. In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to synchronize against online/offline request (e.g. from user space) - which already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"). add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do. Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space, once the memory has been fully added to the system. The lock is not held yet in drivers/xen/balloon.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock. Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by XEN, which is never built as a module. If somebody requires it, we also have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never exported). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-31mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lockDavid Hildenbrand
Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3. Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used, I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock. While e.g. echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state is fine, e.g. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and device_hotplug_lock. E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then. Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details), and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which sounds wrong. Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock(). More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6. I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6): 1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. 2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and holds for all callers. 3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up. 4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/ online_pages/offline_pages. To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural. This patch (of 6): remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant that takes the lock and only export that one. The lock is already held in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-31mm: remove include/linux/bootmem.hMike Rapoport
Move remaining definitions and declarations from include/linux/bootmem.h into include/linux/memblock.h and remove the redundant header. The includes were replaced with the semantic patch below and then semi-automated removal of duplicated '#include <linux/memblock.h> @@ @@ - #include <linux/bootmem.h> + #include <linux/memblock.h> [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: dma-direct: fix up for the removal of linux/bootmem.h] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002185342.133d1680@canb.auug.org.au [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: powerpc: fix up for removal of linux/bootmem.h] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: x86/kaslr, ACPI/NUMA: fix for linux/bootmem.h removal] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181008190341.5e396491@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536927045-23536-30-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-26mm/memory_hotplug.c: clean up node_states_check_changes_offline()Oscar Salvador
This patch, as the previous one, gets rid of the wrong if statements. While at it, I realized that the comments are sometimes very confusing, to say the least, and wrong. For example: ___ zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE; /* * check whether node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] will be changed * If we try to offline the last present @nr_pages from the node, * we can determind we will need to clear the node from * node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]. */ for (; zt <= zone_last; zt++) present_pages += pgdat->node_zones[zt].present_pages; if (nr_pages >= present_pages) arg->status_change_nid = zone_to_nid(zone); else arg->status_change_nid = -1; ___ In case the node gets empry, it must be removed from N_MEMORY. We already check N_HIGH_MEMORY a bit above within the CONFIG_HIGHMEM ifdef code. Not to say that status_change_nid is for N_MEMORY, and not for N_HIGH_MEMORY. So I re-wrote some of the comments to what I think is better. [osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-5-osalvador@techadventures.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-6-osalvador@techadventures.net Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalv